Quote:
Originally Posted by biggus diggus
Of course it's a matter of perspective. My takeaway is that a vast majority of people commute by car, so the goal is to satisfy the needs of those who commute by bike without impeding the commutes of the majority. I think two parallels bicycle roads that are 3/4 mile apart achieves that.
|
If Washington/Jefferson were at or near capacity, I might agree, but those streets are never congested. There's plenty of excess space there if anyone no longer wants to drive a transformed Van Buren. In terms of cross-town travel, I agree the Fillmore bike boulevard and the Washington/Jefferson pair are sufficient. I'm thinking more in terms of access to local businesses along Van Buren via bike, along with quality of life improvements that would result from a calmer street. Unfortunately, some residents perceived the opposite, claiming that bike lanes would bring more crime. I'm still trying to wrap my head around that one.