Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee
Yes, I'm dissing the design in the image above. I'm really tiring of the half-assed nod to the historic vernacular. Those facades have no depth, no character, they look exactly like what they are - faux-historical wallpaper pasted onto a monolithic structure behind it. If these lots were developed independently in a fine grained manner, my criticism of the architecture would be slightly less. But there is absolutley no honesty in what you see there. An not only no honesty, no character, a phony facsmile if i've ever seen one. There's an ethos I wish all practicing architects would live by... If you want to do neo- this or that and design an actual revival structure, you need to have the budget to do that. If you don't have the budget to do that, do something different.
|
How are they not honest? The materials are what they are and do what they do, they keep out the weather and arranged in a logical manner with headers spanning openings, metal clad bays and some sort of cornice that caps the wall assembly. This isnt trying to be an Italinate or Queen Ann revival, it's just trying to be good infill, which I think it achieves and is sorely needed in this part of town. Would I like to see more depth? Yes, but it's not feasible. The only thing that would be more "honest" than this would be to skin the framing in liner panel and oh joy, a giant paneled warehouse is what we'd all get to look at. And even then, to it right, may not even be a savings in panel.