Quote:
Originally Posted by caligrad
Regulation is the issue. Especially here in the LA area. Must have XYZ and if it doesnt, its a non starter. IMO. Does it meet Earthquake and fire standards? Yes? BUILD IT. All of the other requirements the city demands just becomes wasteful at some point.
|
You say this, but then look at the comments on nearly any new development article. "It's so ugly, how could the city allow this to get built?" "Needs to have more affordable units." "Parking!!!" People generally want the government to intervene to make the city more walkable and attractive, incentivize more affordable housing, make sure development won't destroy their neighborhood character or take away parking (two NIMBY greatest hits).
I agree that we generally over regulate development, and I'd argue the regulation isn't very effective. Developers have to pay massive fees to fund affordable housing and new parks, but I sure haven't seen much in the way of new parks, and we all know the affordable housing situation. Our design regulations can be extremely detailed, yet we still get utter shit built all over the city. I don't think we should just do away with development regulations, but I agree they should be reigned in.