HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2023, 8:14 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,595
Sinclair Centre Redevelopment

Assume there's enough information that this project is going to proceed. Found some new images from the architects doing some pre-planning on this project.

That tower schematic has ~31 floors and you assume 5-6 floors from the podium below that? From the solar schematic the tower is based over the Public Building on the corner of Granville/Cordova. Doesn't look like it extends past the footprint of that building except into that atrium space between the buildings next door.









https://www.localpractice.ca/sinclai...-redevelopment

Last edited by jollyburger; Jan 16, 2023 at 11:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2023, 8:33 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,280
Need to see more what they will do with the heritage portions of the centre.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 12:56 AM
theKB theKB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 906
The old escada space that is fairly large and would be well suited to a high end restaurant. Too bad Vancouver has trouble attracting and/or keeping big name restauranteurs/chefs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 1:09 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,837
The idea of a 31 story tower on top of the 5/6 story podium that only takes up about 1/4 of the area's footprint with wind turbines on top makes me happy to see... but I don't want to get my hopes up, as this is could be a rejected / dismissed idea since this is just "pre-planning' renders.

It will make the final reveal of a huge squat square 18 floors tall taking up the entire footprint so not to penetrate the view cones only more disappointing.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 2:14 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,689
That tower floor plate seems small for the numbers we currently have unless they plan to go tall, really tall. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the numbers.

These are the latest numbers AFAIK:
Quote:
Site: approx. 6,200sm
Site Master Planning: approx.. 125-150,000sm gfa
Schematic Design: approx. 75,000sm

Occupancy:
  • Office Space for Government of Canada (Private / Special Purpose, Semi-Private / Public Facing) – approx. 65,000sm
    • Generic Office Space: approx. 40,000sm (approx 10% public facing component)
    • Special Purpose Office Space: approx. 25,000sm
    • Approx 3,000 work points for 6,000 ftes
    • Approx 15 departments (ranging from 2,000-15,000sm each)
  • Ground Floor: Retail – approx. 3,000sm

Parking: approx. 1-2 levels of underground bike parking, car parking and loading (approx.200 cars, 15 van/truck loading spaces, 1000 bikes / end of trip facilities)
Page 64 https://buyandsell.gc.ca/cds/public/...81.EBSU000.PDF

Those renders show a tower around 1400m square; if the existing buildings/podium are 25-30k sqm gross (an approximation) and using 125-150sqm total project gfa gets a tower 70-80 storeys. I must be misunderstanding something.

Last edited by madog222; Jan 17, 2023 at 3:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 2:37 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,689
Even trying to use the office + retail space (68k sqm) and a 1200 sqm floor plate tower makes a 50-60 storeys .

I think I've been reading into this concept render too much .

Last edited by madog222; Jan 17, 2023 at 3:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 6:32 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,187
So. Much. Greenwashing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 6:39 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,837
If the greenwashing bends the city’s hand to accepting a taller tower, I will be all for it.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 7:29 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
That tower floor plate seems small for the numbers we currently have unless they plan to go tall, really tall. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the numbers.
The current buildings currently have around 36K sq metres in floorspace. When I checked on Google Maps the proposed tower seemed to be around 1800-2000sqm.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 7:44 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
The current buildings currently have around 36K sq metres in floorspace. When I checked on Google Maps the proposed tower seemed to be around 1800-2000sqm.
Looking again, my best match to what is shown is 1550sqm. The tower covers/replaces at least half of the Federal Building which gave my 25-30k sqm estimate.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 8:20 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,595
I had the tower going further into the building in the left. I used that notch in the facade facing Hastings as the reference point.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 9:06 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,689
I think that notch includes the west entryway on the Post Office building but you're probably right that it goes a bit further left. Then the numbers start to match 30 stories.

Last edited by madog222; Jan 17, 2023 at 9:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 11:25 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,397
I think madog's got the right of it - the east building's the most expendable, so gutting it while leaving the other three mostly intact gets most of the NIMBYs off their case.

Last edited by Migrant_Coconut; Jan 26, 2023 at 5:02 PM. Reason: Got the directions mixed up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 2:00 PM
gaviscon gaviscon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 245
So..we're expecting the first proposal to be at least 180m, right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 3:08 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,847
I would love to see some comprehensive, detailed renders of the new building to go up at Sinclair Centre.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2023, 3:40 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 5,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
I would love to see some comprehensive, detailed renders of the new building to go up at Sinclair Centre.
There isn't a developer or architect selected yet. The government have hired Colliers to manage a P3 project process to invite bids to design, build and manage the new building for 30 years. That won't be a public process, so it'll probably be some time before we see anything that emerges from that selection. They're not planning on emptying the Sinclair Centre until 2024.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2023, 7:55 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,361
I expect a 30/31 storey tower would hit a view cone, too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2023, 8:05 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I expect a 30/31 storey tower would hit a view cone, too.
If that doesn’t count the existing base it would for sure pierce through it. Even if it did include the base I feel that would still go through a view cone (unless the floors are very squashed.)
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2023, 6:17 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 5,915
I think the design exercise by LocalPractice was examining how a net zero office complex might be achieved. It is undated, as far as I can see, and it's not currently displayed on the company website, so I assume it was once on there, but they removed it but didn't completely delete it from existance.

The 2015 rezoning inquiry for the redevelopment of Sinclain Centre said "The development will adhere to the City’s urban design considerations, including the View Corridors which limit maximum height to no more than 106.7 m (350 ft.) or approximately 29 commercial storeys."

The federal government can ignore local policies, and they can build whatever they want without a Development Permit, but they've indicated up to now that isn't their intention.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2023, 7:03 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
I think the design exercise by LocalPractice was examining how a net zero office complex might be achieved. It is undated, as far as I can see, and it's not currently displayed on the company website, so I assume it was once on there, but they removed it but didn't completely delete it from existance.

The 2015 rezoning inquiry for the redevelopment of Sinclain Centre said "The development will adhere to the City’s urban design considerations, including the View Corridors which limit maximum height to no more than 106.7 m (350 ft.) or approximately 29 commercial storeys."

The federal government can ignore local policies, and they can build whatever they want without a Development Permit, but they've indicated up to now that isn't their intention.
It's old found some archived pages on their website around 2017-2018 with those images. But the 2015 inquiry also mentioned 100,000 sq m while the most recent ones are talking about 125-150,000 at max buildout..
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.