HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2021, 12:14 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Smile NEW YORK | 1 Park Row | 305 FT | 23 FLOORS

I thought that there was a thread for this, but I couldn’t find it.

https://therealdeal.com/2021/06/11/h...ith-120m-loan/


Last edited by chris08876; Jun 12, 2021 at 11:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2021, 1:26 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,218
It's curious why they've been so reluctant to release a full height rendering. Do we even have a projected floor count?
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2021, 2:03 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
It's curious why they've been so reluctant to release a full height rendering. Do we even have a projected floor count?
I agree.

I don’t think that it will be more than 400’ or 500’.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2021, 3:21 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 32,066
There was a rendering for this tower a few months ago. Maybe on NY YIMBY or City Realty?

Believe it's a fairly tall tower, but yeah, I don't think it was taller than 400-500 ft.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2021, 3:38 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,218
Well i haven't seen one and a google image search only shows this same base rendering we've seen for the last four years.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2021, 10:17 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
It will be 23 floors and 305’ tall. Fogsrty Finger is the architect.

http://a810-bisweb.nyc.gov/bisweb/Jo...ssdocnumber=01
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2021, 1:52 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,218

_



So maybe the height between the second and last strut on the side there.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2021, 1:53 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,218
The Park Row Building is 390'
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2021, 2:18 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
I’m glad that the beautiful crown on the old building won’t be obscured.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2021, 7:23 PM
Visionist's Avatar
Visionist Visionist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 250
Half of those lot line windows are for apartment bedrooms aren't they? How's that gonna work?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2021, 7:52 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,218
^The same way it works every time a new building goes up on an adjacent lot, "well shit, looks like you're outta luck." This literally has been happening for 150 years, not sure what the confusion about how this works is about.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2021, 11:05 AM
Visionist's Avatar
Visionist Visionist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 250


https://www.nyc-architecture.com/SCC/SCC012.htm

False alarm all lot line bedrooms also boast lightwell windows. That's not gonna help the units on the lower floors however.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2021, 4:03 PM
Drcastro Drcastro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: SW Mpls
Posts: 422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
^The same way it works every time a new building goes up on an adjacent lot, "well shit, looks like you're outta luck." This literally has been happening for 150 years, not sure what the confusion about how this works is about.
Isn’t part of the confusion because in some cases developers bought the air rights to adjacent buildings so this wouldn’t be a problem? Those huge blank walls are built in the cases where they didn’t, I assume.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2021, 4:33 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,218
^I think that is the case in relatively recent times. In pre-war buildings, if the lot line wall contained lot line windows, there was no guarantee those windows would not be obstructed by a new structure next door, in other words that building had no ownership of the air above the lower neighboring building. In those cases as in this case, the windows are removed and the window openings bricked in.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2021, 2:07 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2021, 2:10 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,653
i like it alot. good infill and nice to get rid of that stubby eyesore old j&r building. its handsome and bigger, yet without being at all bothersome.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2021, 2:15 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
i like it alot. good infill and nice to get rid of that stubby eyesore old j&r building. its handsome and bigger, yet without being at all bothersome.
I agree. The transformation of Park Row has been spectacular.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2021, 2:42 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,218
It's okay. I'm not sure I understand the necessity of the setbacks. The base is definitely a step down from the previous base rendering imo.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin

Last edited by Busy Bee; Jun 18, 2021 at 3:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2021, 3:11 PM
NYer34 NYer34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
I agree. The transformation of Park Row has been spectacular.
I couldn't agree more. It's one of the few "unalloyed" good stories about NY architecture and development over the last 20 years.

So much of NYC development seems to leave the city worse off (e.g., anything happening in the Garment District ... the wiping out of entire blocks of century old buildings in Yorkville ... bland architecture replacing small-lot historic structures in nearly every corner of Midtown ... etc. etc. etc.).

Park Row is just a total win-win-win. Always happy to read updates on this block - unlike the cringe-inducing updates I see in threads about the Garment District, Midtown, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2021, 3:27 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 11,218
Previous base rendering to compare to new:


_

First thing noticed is they have increased the base from 4 floors to 6.

While the massing of the full render looks good aside from the strange setbacks, I think I liked the detailing of the original 2017 base rendering more than the new. Dare I say the new render window treatment has a Chicago School feel to it?
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:46 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.