HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2007, 3:20 PM
Sekkle's Avatar
Sekkle Sekkle is offline
zzzzzzzz
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland area
Posts: 2,276
^ The hotel off the 202 at 44th is a Marriot, but I agree that neither that nor this Sheraton is all that impressive. I'm kind of curious to see how well the Sheraton caters to pedestrians. I thought I saw some old renderings where it looked like there was a big drive-up lobby, which isn't the best fit for a downtown... These renderings don't seem to show that. Time will tell I guess. I just hope it interacts well with the sidewalk and that the parking structure isn't in a prominent place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2007, 4:06 PM
kevininlb kevininlb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimInCal View Post
Kevin, you must be the one. It just isn't anything special...like it coulda, shoulda been. I'm not hating it like I used to. Let's see how it fits into the area and looks up close and on the skyline. Maybe it won't be as bad as most of us think.
Yes, let's see how it turns out. I don't know how many people on this site remember this, but the haters were tossing big ol' bombs at the new convention center while it was under construction. Now it's widely praised for being a beautiful, functional building (not to mention, one that has brought quite a bit of foot traffic to the surrounding streets). Later.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2007, 3:38 PM
NorthScottsdale NorthScottsdale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 301
i actually really like this building and think that it will look great in the dt phoenix skyline. i woulda liked glass a lot better but this will really help to fill some gaps in the skyline. i also like how it utilized all the empty space on the lot with the convention center and how it wraps around the other tower that is on the corner of the lot. once this is done i think it will be a great addition

It kinda reminds me of the hotels in vegas. tall, wide, and a really thin side profile. bring on a few more like this!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2007, 5:32 PM
DevdogAZ's Avatar
DevdogAZ DevdogAZ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 374
I think it's interesting that they have oriented this building to have north south views rather than east west. I would think that east west would provide better vistas (White Tanks/Superstitions) and it would also be better for sun issues.

I don't hate the design. I don't think it's the best I've seen, but at least the roof is interesting. Hopefully the facing will be interesting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2007, 7:11 PM
KEVINphx's Avatar
KEVINphx KEVINphx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevdogAZ View Post
I think it's interesting that they have oriented this building to have north south views rather than east west. I would think that east west would provide better vistas (White Tanks/Superstitions) and it would also be better for sun issues.

I don't hate the design. I don't think it's the best I've seen, but at least the roof is interesting. Hopefully the facing will be interesting.

um.... what about Camelback and Piestewa/South Mountain?

as far as sun goes, I was under the impression that it rose in the east and set in the west? so making it face those directions makes NO sense as far as efficiency goes?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2007, 7:43 PM
plinko's Avatar
plinko plinko is offline
them bones
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Barbara adjacent
Posts: 7,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevdogAZ View Post
I think it's interesting that they have oriented this building to have north south views rather than east west. I would think that east west would provide better vistas (White Tanks/Superstitions) and it would also be better for sun issues.
No! No! and No! Turning the building 90 degrees would be a disaster from an energy use standpoint. Trust me...this is well thought out and easily proven.

Nonetheless, the worst case in terms of sun is actually on the NW corner of the building (due to late afternoon summer sunshine).
__________________
Even if you are 1 in a million, there are still 8,000 people just like you...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2007, 7:52 PM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,175
Northwest??????

Don't you mean southwest?

I don't think the sun ever shines north to south.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2007, 7:59 PM
plinko's Avatar
plinko plinko is offline
them bones
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Barbara adjacent
Posts: 7,400
If you're driving west on a late summer afternoon, notice that the sun will be not directly in the west, but slightly to the north of it. Hottest part of the day during the hottest part of the year. Ever notice that the sun comes up over Four Peaks in the summer? That's NE of Phoenix!

You have to go as far north as the Canadian border before you don't get ANY sun on the north face of your building.

Even the Empire State Building gets sun on its north face in the summer.

Pure science...it's how we crazy architects determine just how deep to make those pretty little overhangs!
__________________
Even if you are 1 in a million, there are still 8,000 people just like you...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2007, 8:21 PM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,175
/\ That's my question... I didn't think the angle of the sun was ever north of the line of latitude that Phoenix sits on. Even then, the worst case in terms of sun would still be in the southwest, simply because the sun shines there more throughout the year. Even if the most intense sunshine "day" of the year is on the northwest, I wouldn't design a building simply to mitigate that one day of most intense sun. I'd design it to mitigate the whole rest of the year of southwest sun.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2007, 3:20 PM
nbrindley's Avatar
nbrindley nbrindley is offline
-_-
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: PHX->IC,IA->ATL
Posts: 254
The sun doesn't follow a straight line throughout the day, but follows an arc because the earth is a sphere and the sun is stationary relative to the earth throughout the day. At noon, the sun is at it's most southerly position in the sky. This effect was very dramatic when, as a kid, I spent my summers in Alaska with my grandparents. They lived south of Anchorage, so no 24 hours of sun, but if you followed the position of the sun throughout the day, you would notice that by sunset, the sun had practically made a 90 degree turn relative to it's motion at noon. As it approaches the horizon, it is moving faster towards the north than it is to the west, and it would set almost directly NW of my grandparents house.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2007, 3:34 PM
Sekkle's Avatar
Sekkle Sekkle is offline
zzzzzzzz
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland area
Posts: 2,276
Quote:
The sun doesn't follow a straight line throughout the day, but follows an arc because the earth is a sphere and the sun is stationary relative to the earth throughout the day.
I'm pretty sure the Earth is flat (or possibly cube-shaped), not spherical in nature.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2007, 2:38 AM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,095
Another tower that is going to fill in the skyline great! I hope we get more in this core area. *cough*Central Park East*cough*

Of course there are also the mid-rise ASU dorms that will go up too, that will help fill things in as well.








Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2007, 3:27 AM
Sekkle's Avatar
Sekkle Sekkle is offline
zzzzzzzz
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland area
Posts: 2,276
^ Great angles, HX. Thanks for the photos!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2007, 8:54 AM
NorthScottsdale NorthScottsdale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 301
great pictures thanks! 44 monroe better hurry up, the sheraton is going to pass it up in no time at all. this thing is rising fast!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2007, 4:42 PM
Azndragon837 Azndragon837 is offline
Desert Urbanite
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 1,433
I noticed that the Sheraton is already up to the 10th level. The floors drop in height beginning with the 5th, if you can see from the pictures provided above. It's still not taller than the Republic building...which makes me skeptical on how tall the building will appear to be.

-Andrew
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2007, 4:49 PM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,095
I only count 9 completed floors, not 10. When the 10th is complete, it will be pretty close to the same as the AZ Republic. Besides, we already know its going to be 360', same as the Bank of America building, except much skinnier.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2007, 9:03 PM
JimInCal's Avatar
JimInCal JimInCal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 597
I was in town for a few days and took a bunch of photos, including some of the Sheraton. I will post them tonight. I wanted to give everyone a little update ASAP though as they have started to attach the cladding to the north and east sides. I took a couple of telephoto shots to get as much detail as possible. The panels are a buff color (let's face it ... a close cousin of beige), just like what you see in the hi-def rendering. They seem to have a slight, sandy texture to them and are of varying rectangular shapes and sizes, pieced together puzzle-like. The color reminds me of French vanilla ice cream.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2007, 9:23 PM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,095
I've been meaning to get downtown for another photo update but I keep waiting for 44 Monroe to get a little more substantial in height.

What date did you take the photos of everything? Now I'll have to wait until more is done! :p
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2007, 10:41 PM
JimInCal's Avatar
JimInCal JimInCal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 597
HX, I was there three days ago, Sunday 2-18. It was later that afternoon and the sun was on the opposite side so the panels were not in bright light. I think they are sufficient to get an idea though. I also took a few of 44 Monroe, but from other places and distances than previous posts to mix it up a little. Hopefully, I can get to posting my pics for the individual project threads tonight. I plan on doing a larger photo thread when time permits this week. I have updates for Summit, 44 Monroe and The Sheraton.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2007, 11:00 PM
JimInCal's Avatar
JimInCal JimInCal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 597
The dreaded double post!

Last edited by JimInCal; Feb 22, 2007 at 4:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.