HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #19721  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2013, 5:59 AM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ Can't blame the NIMBY's. That looks like shit
Careful what you ask for:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19722  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2013, 12:18 PM
J_M_Tungsten's Avatar
J_M_Tungsten J_M_Tungsten is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,379
When will it end!? This beige fad is so bad for Chicago. Truly awful.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19723  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2013, 1:50 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,557
^^ Tell me that's not a real, current proposal........please. Looks almost Dick Mannish, or perhaps Mark McKinneyish.....or their hideous designphobic scandalous love child....at any rate a nightmare.
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19724  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2013, 4:18 PM
Mikemak27's Avatar
Mikemak27 Mikemak27 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
Careful what you ask for:
Please tell me that isn't the rendering for the small / mid rise apartment proposal in the river north neighborhood along Dearborn. Yuck!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19725  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2013, 5:55 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,292
^ That is soooooooooooo River North!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19726  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2013, 6:14 PM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,939
Yeah, that's not wonderful. That rendering, along with the rendering for the previous iteration, are from a weird perspective, though (maybe not even a real one?). I'd still like to see an elevation for this before I lament the presence of this. At least the first four floors are more contextual...

......
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19727  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2013, 7:15 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayward View Post
That is soooooooooooo River North!
It hurts. It hurts so bad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19728  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2013, 8:01 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
I like the garage! C'mon, I've heard you praise some buildings for being delightfully tacky. This building is like Hooters.
Needs more orange. I live near the River North Hooters, and two Germans I have been hosting over the weekend went there last night "just to say they'd been." No accounting for taste ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
Careful what you ask for:
Is that a real variant?

For those who couldn't figure it out, that's the location of the proposal for 707 N Wells, but a lot of surrounding buildings are missing for some reason.

I suppose it is more "contextual" but only if the context is that Flair Tower thing on Erie ...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19729  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 3:06 AM
Ch.G, Ch.G's Avatar
Ch.G, Ch.G Ch.G, Ch.G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
I like the garage! C'mon, I've heard you praise some buildings for being delightfully tacky. This building is like Hooters.
Ed Debevics is delightfully tacky. Hooters is awful. But point taken. Sort of. I mean, I enjoy that garage, too, but precisely because it's so bad/not-good. And I don't think kitsch is evidence of an architect's talents.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19730  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 6:27 AM
Koodoo25's Avatar
Koodoo25 Koodoo25 is offline
Illustrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New York / Chicago
Posts: 161
Movie Set

It's over now, but this weekend there was a movie (Jupiter Ascending) that was being filmed on Canal, close to the construction site for 444 West Lake.



There were also several other locations all over the city, mainly along the river and around the Gold Coast where they filmed this weekend.
__________________
My Diagram
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19731  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 10:22 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koodoo25 View Post
It's over now, but this weekend there was a movie (Jupiter Ascending) that was being filmed on Canal, close to the construction site for 444 West Lake.



There were also several other locations all over the city, mainly along the river and around the Gold Coast where they filmed this weekend.
They were rigging lights on the Lake st bridge yesterday afternoon.
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19732  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 2:14 PM
george's Avatar
george george is offline
dream fast
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: east village, chicago
Posts: 3,291
7-21

Wrigley Plaza rehab




Existing glazed terra-cotta


Recreated glazed terra-cotta

__________________
To have ambition was my ambition - Gang of Four
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19733  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 2:35 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,896
5 three-story, 6 residential unit buildings (30 total units) got approved for work in "South Old Irving Park" on Milwaukee, not terribly far from Kilbourn Park. This is nice because the site is currently a small open field - More infill. Architect is Bill G. Kokalias.

Buildings at 3408, 3414, 3420, 3426, 3434 N Milwaukee Ave

Last edited by marothisu; Jul 24, 2013 at 3:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19734  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 2:41 PM
MultiModal MultiModal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 157
When will the Wrigley Plaza get retail?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19735  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 2:54 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias View Post
Needs more orange. I live near the River North Hooters, and two Germans I have been hosting over the weekend went there last night "just to say they'd been." No accounting for taste ...



Is that a real variant?

For those who couldn't figure it out, that's the location of the proposal for 707 N Wells, but a lot of surrounding buildings are missing for some reason.

I suppose it is more "contextual" but only if the context is that Flair Tower thing on Erie ...

Let's just really hope that this wasn't an unsophisticated developer/architect team's response to unsophisticated River North NIMBYs. For me, this is absolutely the most frustrating type of awful design that I see in this city. Either when you have a development/design team that simply doesn't know any better, or just caves to any uninformed, unknowing neighborhood 'feedback', and produces a design to be more 'contextual', inoffensive etc when in fact it is not at all, and usually ends up being ridiculously bad postmodern or neotraditional garbage. The obviously better contextualism would be to keep the design modern, but respectful, taking some scaling, massing cues, etc. Just the slightest bit of design sophistication is needed. By appearances, nobody seems to have it in the case of 707 Wells. The first version (if this was infact the chronological order) was right to be modern, but it was a clumsy, disrespectful attempt. So then there's this preposterous over(mis)reaction by pulling a 180 and making it some beige painted concrete pomo schlock in an attempt to be more contextual, when in fact it is anything but!
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19736  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 3:14 PM
J_M_Tungsten's Avatar
J_M_Tungsten J_M_Tungsten is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryc View Post
They were rigging lights on the Lake st bridge yesterday afternoon.
They are filming in a house near Dearborn and Schiller in the Gold Coast as well for this movie. I was running when I came across the quiet set and a bunch of people trying to get a glimpse of Channing Tatum. I kept running.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19737  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 5:26 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Retail-apartment tower planned at busy Lakeview intersection



HELLLLLS yeah, I've been waiting YEARS for something here to happen. That Dunkin donuts parking lot is such a pathetic use of that space. Even if the NIMBY's whittle this down to half its size, it will be a huge (and much needed) boost for that intersection.
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19738  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 5:55 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Retail-apartment tower planned at busy Lakeview intersection



HELLLLLS yeah, I've been waiting YEARS for something here to happen. That Dunkin donuts parking lot is such a pathetic use of that space. Even if the NIMBY's whittle this down to half its size, it will be a huge (and much needed) boost for that intersection.
Besides getting the height reduced I wouldn't expect significant neighborhood interference. The DD it's and parking lot are magnets for problems late at night...many people around here would be very pleased to see it go away.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19739  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 6:12 PM
gallo's Avatar
gallo gallo is offline
North Beach Style
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 241
As a neighborhood resident, the Belmont and Clark project would be fantastic, though I'll hate to see the Taboo building on Belmont get demoed. The next step would be redeveloping the huge wasted parking area/drive through bank zone at Belmont and Halsted. It will be interesting to see how the height-fight plays out as there is a 15 story senior building 1/2 block away down Clark.
__________________
I've seen friends bow to needles
I've seen needles bow to records
I've seen boughs break
I've seen God bow and make the clouds shake
I've seen the proud break
I've seen alot for a blind soldier
Who tattooed the cityscape upon skin just to blend in...
-aesop rock
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19740  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 6:22 PM
OhioGuy OhioGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 7,685
Quote:
The developers plan to tear down the existing structures to make way for an eight- to 12-story building that would include two levels of retail, two floors of parking and several stories of apartments, Mr. Lake said. The pair hopes to secure a grocer as an anchor tenant for the estimated $50 million project, Mr. Blitz said.
I wish they could at least incorporate the facade of 850-854 Belmont into the design rather than tear everything down. Is the exterior terra-cotta? Regardless of what it is, I like the detail... more interesting than most new construction ever produces. But otherwise I'm thrilled to hear this corner will finally be redeveloped into something more appropriate for a location just two minutes from the L.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:16 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.