HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1941  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 7:38 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Reported Today: RFP for traffic study on the Portage and Main intersection as well as bids from local companies to remove the barriers around the windy corner.

Get it done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1942  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 7:41 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyro View Post
Reported Today: RFP for traffic study on the Portage and Main intersection as well as bids from local companies to remove the barriers around the windy corner.

Get it done.
Yup because that's the most pressing issue for the majority of the citizens in Winnipeg. Special interests pushing for the opening while in realty no one cares.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1943  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 7:56 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,326
RFP came out a week or two ago. Some posts a couple pages back on the various scenarios for traffic light cycles. Or it might be in the Winnipeg Construction thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1944  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 8:00 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
^ thx bj, just heard about it today, the construction thread has become a little mindnumbing of late missed the post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1945  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 8:14 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Yup because that's the most pressing issue for the majority of the citizens in Winnipeg. Special interests pushing for the opening while in realty no one cares.
yeah, I don't think most Peggers give a damn.

But personally, I'm friggin tired of that windswept dead zone we call P&Main..
It's an eyesore..I equate it to how I feel about the Pegs numerous downtown surface parking lots..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1946  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2016, 9:28 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyro View Post
^ thx bj, just heard about it today, the construction thread has become a little mindnumbing of late missed the post
The Portage and Main re-opening/ remain closed to surface ped. traffic debate warranted it's own thread, just saying.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1947  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2016, 10:25 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1948  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2016, 11:00 PM
biguc's Avatar
biguc biguc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pinkoland
Posts: 11,751
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Yup because that's the most pressing issue for the majority of the citizens in Winnipeg. Special interests pushing for the opening while in realty no one cares.
Just like Mexicans asking for better water treatment are a special interest group because everyone is used to drinking rancid tap water anyway.
__________________
no
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1949  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2016, 2:02 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,747
Waverley underpass is not a priority for the majority of winnipeggers either...and it's being pushed by a special interest group. Suburban drivers.

Yet here we are.

Actually deciding on portage and main is a priority. The decision either way has a hard legal deadline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1950  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2016, 6:24 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by biguc View Post
Just like Mexicans asking for better water treatment are a special interest group because everyone is used to drinking rancid tap water anyway.
Exactly! Yeah look at Flint, Michigan where the residents were drinking filthy lake water, the state disconnected the pipe and started giving the pristine river water, but were they happy with that, oh no....... Proving you can't please everybody all the time!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1951  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2016, 5:34 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
So much for openness and transparency with a new mayor and council as we're finding out with the Waverley underpass proposal a private citizens (Klassen) critique of the project forced the administration to admit that, contrary to what had been told to councillors previously, there had not been a standard cost/benefit analysis done on the project. Furthermore how this project catapulted up on the list of the city's priority's is troubling. Or in other words, what south Winnipeg wants, south Winnipeg gets!

Katz= Bowman (more of the same)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1952  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2016, 5:54 PM
Bluenote Bluenote is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Winnipeg / St Vital
Posts: 1,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
So much for openness and transparency with a new mayor and council as we're finding out with the Waverley underpass proposal a private citizens (Klassen) critique of the project forced the administration to admit that, contrary to what had been told to councillors previously, there had not been a standard cost/benefit analysis done on the project. Furthermore how this project catapulted up on the list of the city's priority's is troubling. Or in other words, what south Winnipeg wants, south Winnipeg gets!

Katz= Bowman (more of the same)
Heaven forbid the largest tax source of the city has any pull lol
Heaven forbid the largest growing part of the city has any priority.

You should be glad this isn't the USA as we south enders would be building all our office building and business in our own neighbourhoods and let the downtown core crumble even more. ( of course I wouldn't want this. But I see it in many large American cities )
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1953  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2016, 9:16 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluenote View Post
Heaven forbid the largest tax source of the city has any pull lol
Heaven forbid the largest growing part of the city has any priority.

You should be glad this isn't the USA as we south enders would be building all our office building and business in our own neighbourhoods and let the downtown core crumble even more. ( of course I wouldn't want this. But I see it in many large American cities )
South end of Winnipeg:

Kenaston underpass $60M

Kenaston flyover $60.7M

BRT downtown to South Winnipeg phase two $408M

BRT phase one $140M

proposed Waverley Underpass $155 M

Roughly $1 Billion so yeah South Winnipeg isn't doing too bad!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1954  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2016, 3:30 PM
Bluenote Bluenote is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Winnipeg / St Vital
Posts: 1,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
South end of Winnipeg:

Kenaston underpass $60M

Kenaston flyover $60.7M

BRT downtown to South Winnipeg phase two $408M

BRT phase one $140M

proposed Waverley Underpass $155 M

Roughly $1 Billion so yeah South Winnipeg isn't doing too bad!
And you can subtract $589 million off that as no underpass built and no phase two built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1955  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2016, 5:30 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluenote View Post
And you can subtract $589 million off that as no underpass built and no phase two built.
But the point is south Winnipeg is going to see that investment in tax dollars soon, something lost on you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1956  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2016, 7:54 PM
mattpa's Avatar
mattpa mattpa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Steinbach
Posts: 145
i didnt know people in south winipeg bussed to osborne to take RT its more of a benifit for people in the north taking them to uni
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1957  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2016, 10:09 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattpa View Post
i didnt know people in south winipeg bussed to osborne to take RT its more of a benifit for people in the north taking them to uni
beat me to it. the biggest benefactors of SWRT will be north enders going to U of M
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1958  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2016, 11:07 PM
Bluenote Bluenote is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Winnipeg / St Vital
Posts: 1,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
But the point is south Winnipeg is going to see that investment in tax dollars soon, something lost on you.
It's been how many years now since phase two was supposed to be built ? Only way it will is of the Feds dump cash into it. Otherwise it will just be another election prop.

And people in the south really don't stop at Jubillee to jump on the RT line. It's mainly university people from the other parts pf the city that use it. Let's not forget where it is destined to end. Oh that's right the University. Connecting it to the UofW. And I guess for the rest of the city to go watch the bombers lose.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1959  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2016, 4:50 AM
GarryEllice's Avatar
GarryEllice GarryEllice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattpa View Post
i didnt know people in south winipeg bussed to osborne to take RT its more of a benifit for people in the north taking them to uni
Why do people think the RT is only for the university? It serves both the university and the SW suburbs. There are significant numbers of passengers in both directions. In the morning there is a large flow of people commuting south to the university on the 160/161, *and* a large flow of people commuting north to downtown on the 137/162/163/181/183. The university is only one branch of the RT service.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1960  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2016, 4:47 PM
TimeFadesAway TimeFadesAway is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluenote View Post
You should be glad this isn't the USA as we south enders would be building all our office building and business in our own neighbourhoods and let the downtown core crumble even more. ( of course I wouldn't want this. But I see it in many large American cities )
Actually, in many US cities, the costs of road improvements that a development would spur (eg, new freeway exits) are charged to the developer, who then passes it on the the homeowners in the form of an increased initial housing cost. Therefore, the Waverley underpass and Kenaston flyover would have been paid for not out of city coffers but out of the pockets of the developer and ultimately the homeowner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:41 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.