Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright
Wayyyy to early to say something like this. This picture doesn't even show any facade that's not being shadowed.
The details are just as intense as the other buildings in this complex which turned out above average. Also, the glass is definitely looking more clear-green in that photo than reflective blue that everyone constantly frets about...
|
So I agree with you that it's too early. However, after taking a close look earlier in the week, I would say that thus far I'm underwhelmed vs my prior expectations, which were definitely high (and still all for the project as a whole). My preference is for something closer to a 300 N LaSalle facade in terms of articulation, transparency v reflectivity, lightness, color. At least at this stage, what we're getting appears to my eyes anyway to be somewhat closer to some of the darker, bluer, more reflective facades of more recent towers. We shall see.
A question I have for some of the real experts on this stuff here: Could 300 N LaSalle be built as-is today in terms of its curtain wall? There's a new energy code since then, no? Would it comply? This may be a lot of the issue - working around the new code to attempt to produce something as aesthetically appealing. If that's the case, hopefully there are workable solutions. I'm really just spitballing, but others will know.