HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1921  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 4:07 AM
Only The Lonely..'s Avatar
Only The Lonely.. Only The Lonely.. is offline
Portage & Main 50 below
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winnipegger View Post

But I would like to ask why many members on this forum think that a large public sector is detrimental to the cities overall image and ultimately prosperity?
The problem is that 50 cents of every provincial dollar comes from another province.


Making the local government the mainstay of economic life in this city, and thinking that good things are bound to come as a result, isn't all that much different than hedging your savings on a Ponzi scheme.

The local economy will keep booming so long as the public works projects flow, which require ever greater and greater amounts scarce tax dollars to sustain.

When those tax dollars run out we're in a lot of trouble.

While there's a strong case for the use of Keynesian economics during economically tough times, our government was spending heavy and without restraint during the relatively good economic years of the last decade all the while making no real effort to encourage significant private investment.

The Payroll tax and Corporate Income tax still remain on the books, the province closed the only two sources of venture capital (Ensis and Crocus), and has backtracked markedly on things like the provincial video game incubator which would do a lot to nurture small homegrown tech savvy operations that could one day grow to be something more.
__________________
WINNIPEG: Home of Canada's first skyscraper!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1922  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 4:24 AM
Bdog's Avatar
Bdog Bdog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Only The Lonely.. View Post
The problem is that 50 cents of every provincial dollar comes from another province.


Making the local government the mainstay of economic life in this city, and thinking that good things are bound to come as a result, isn't all that much different than hedging your savings on a Ponzi scheme.

The local economy will keep booming so long as the public works projects flow, which require ever greater and greater amounts scarce tax dollars to sustain.

When those tax dollars run out we're in a lot of trouble.

While there's a strong case for the use of Keynesian economics during economically tough times, our government was spending heavy and without restraint during the relatively good economic years of the last decade all the while making no real effort to encourage significant private investment.

The Payroll tax and Corporate Income tax still remain on the books, the province closed the only two sources of venture capital (Ensis and Crocus), and has backtracked markedly on things like the provincial video game incubator which would do a lot to nurture small homegrown tech savvy operations that could one day grow to be something more.
What specific policies would Hugh Mcfadyen implement to make Winnipeg a more attractive place for the private sector? What particular programs would he cut to finance a payroll tax cut? A quick glance on the conservatives website shows that their platform is based on INCREASING investments to a variety of sectors (whether roads, families, edu, health, seniors, etc). In terms of government spending, I have a hard time understanding how the conservatives would be any better...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1923  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 4:56 AM
Winnipegger Winnipegger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Only The Lonely.. View Post
The problem is that 50 cents of every provincial dollar comes from another province.


Making the local government the mainstay of economic life in this city, and thinking that good things are bound to come as a result, isn't all that much different than hedging your savings on a Ponzi scheme.

The local economy will keep booming so long as the public works projects flow, which require ever greater and greater amounts scarce tax dollars to sustain.

When those tax dollars run out we're in a lot of trouble.

While there's a strong case for the use of Keynesian economics during economically tough times, our government was spending heavy and without restraint during the relatively good economic years of the last decade all the while making no real effort to encourage significant private investment.

The Payroll tax and Corporate Income tax still remain on the books, the province closed the only two sources of venture capital (Ensis and Crocus), and has backtracked markedly on things like the provincial video game incubator which would do a lot to nurture small homegrown tech savvy operations that could one day grow to be something more.
Again, it is NOT 50 cents for every dollar. It's 32 and a half cents, which is significantly a lot less, so don't exaggerate such crucial statistics. Take a look at the 2010/2011 budget. Perhaps you are not giving this province enough credit since your preconception about federal transfers seems overly exaggerated the amount our province receives.

I would also like to add that there are many industries here that do not depend on federal stimulus to keep themselves going. Now I have absolutely no problem with Government stimulus, and in fact quite agree with many Keynesian principles, but like I said, this province does better for itself than you think. The tax dollars won't run out, but as the transfers shrink in size, the province will accommodate. Would you personally like to pay higher taxes such that your roads and public transportation system are in better condition while the provincial and city government grants tax cuts to corporations so you have a nice new shiny skyscraper to brag about in the Canadian Skyline thread? I would, but I don't think many people would agree. People prefer lower taxes over a gleaming skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1924  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 5:34 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Only The Lonely.. View Post
The problem is that 50 cents of every provincial dollar comes from another province.
What? No. The budget is over $13B, and federal transfers make up just over $3.5B. Levels are similar to those in Quebec and the maritimes per capita. Equalization peaked in 2008 - 2009, and has been falling. It was only growing before because the program was growing at phenomenal rates because of pre recession growth in the oil provinces and Ontario. They were raising the average faster than we could grow, and our growth was at a very healthy rate (coming between 2.5% and 4% depending on the year).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1925  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 3:50 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winnipegger View Post
The tax dollars won't run out, but as the transfers shrink in size, the province will accommodate.
How exactly?

There are two choices really.

1. Increase levels of personal taxation, which will drive our youth and best people away as has been happening recently. So much so that programs had to be introduced to encourage graduates to stay (which will in the end be ineffective).

2. Raid Hydro for more money, increasing their already $7+ billion debt.

Don't go on about how all this spending has improved health care here either. Our ratio of cost versus outcomes is among the worst of all the provinces. Any spending increases of late have gone either to boosting union wages (nurses) to unprecedented levels or to further bloating the regional health authorities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1926  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 8:56 PM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Or...the province could continue with its healthy growth (and it's expected to). Transfers only shrink because a province is doing better (now that the system isn't the way it was where a few provinces kept the average rising faster than anyone could ever overcome.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1927  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 11:51 PM
Only The Lonely..'s Avatar
Only The Lonely.. Only The Lonely.. is offline
Portage & Main 50 below
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt18325 View Post
Or...the province could continue with its healthy growth (and it's expected to). Transfers only shrink because a province is doing better (now that the system isn't the way it was where a few provinces kept the average rising faster than anyone could ever overcome.
But the province doesn't have healthy growth, it has to continually raid Manitoba Hydro in order to balance the books.

The SpenDP has even done away with balanced budget legislation in favour of a new three year rolling target.


If transfer payments dropped by even 10% we would be fucked.
__________________
WINNIPEG: Home of Canada's first skyscraper!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1928  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2011, 12:42 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Only The Lonely.. View Post
But the province doesn't have healthy growth, it has to continually raid Manitoba Hydro in order to balance the books.
Yes, in fact the province does. You stating things doesn't make them fact. The reality is, the year before the recession, Manitoba was the fastest growing province in Canada. In 2009, we were stagnant while everyone else shrunk, and in 2010, we grew just below average. This year, we will grow at or just above the Canadian average.

Quote:
The SpenDP has even done away with balanced budget legislation in favour of a new three year rolling target.
Just like every other province in the country. Try again though, I'm sure you'll hit eventually. The reality is that the NDP has lowered taxes in the province and continues to do so. Budgets were balanced until the recession, and Hydro is a provincial possession with which the province can do what it wants.

Quote:
If transfer payments dropped by even 10% we would be fucked.
Again, just like every other province. Manitoba would be hurt by losing $350M in transfers, but so would Alberta. We'd have to cut (in fact the provincial government cut from the non key areas - ares other than health, education, and infrastructure - this very year) just like anyone else.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1929  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2011, 1:51 AM
North of 49's Avatar
North of 49 North of 49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Swaggerville
Posts: 267
I drove through down town Winnipeg today and was remembering my drive through Chi-town and Toronto last year. And yes we do have a lot of surface parking lots.

I'm surprised the development opportunities have not yet been fully realized in this town. Just seems sporadic at best with the downtown development.

Maybe I'm just impatient with the pace of development.
__________________
"And any man, who knows a thing, knows
he knows not a damn, damn thing at all..."
K'naan Take a minute
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1930  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2011, 3:00 AM
RTD RTD is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 867
On a more positive note, as opposed to the "doom and gloom" drivel:

Two movies mean ‘hundreds of jobs’
By WINNIPEG SUN
Wednesday, January 25, 2011

Two major movie productions set to start up in Winnipeg on Valentine’s Day mean plenty of work for those in the film industry here.

Ginny Collins, communications and marketing director with Manitoba Film and Music, said Tuesday the cameras will get rolling on the seventh instalment in the Beethoven family movie franchise and Wrong Turn 4, a horror flick.

Wrong Turn 4 is a 20th Century Fox production while Beethoven, featuring a friendly St. Bernard, is a Universal project.

“This means a really good start for 2011,” Collins said. “We’re really excited about these two big films shooting here in Manitoba.”

The pictures will both feature winter or holiday themes, so Winnipeg was the perfect setting this time of year, Collins said.

Both films will work with local company Original Pictures. Casting has not been confirmed for either project.

Collins said the two films will likely mean hundreds jobs for local talent and crew.

“It means really good things for the province and the economy,” he said.

Collins said talks are in the works for other film productions throughout the year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1931  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2011, 8:18 PM
j.online j.online is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NBO
Posts: 368
Another great article TV. (except... Sex and the City?... really???)

Let's build a city we can love
Urban design must develop a connection with people

The stars of the romantic comedy Sex and the City spent six seasons searching for love. Relationships came and went, Big, Aidan and the Russian, but the love affair that remained constant was the one they had with their city. Their emotional connection to the vibrancy, character and style of New York was the show's consistent thread.

Marking the end of the 2010 Cultural Capital celebrations, the Winnipeg Arts Council invited former Vancouver senior community planner Larry Beasley to the My City is Still Breathing Symposium to discuss how this type of urban love affair can be a defining factor in the image, physical expression and economy of a city.

Beasley described that since the Second World War, urban planning in cities like Winnipeg has been primarily an exercise in vehicle management, trading the human experience for the conveniences of modern life.

While urban design has focused on the engineering of movement, it has ignored the issues of beauty, social engagement and livability that inspire emotional connections to the city. Who could be in love with the oceans of asphalt and the concrete canyons of Pembina Highway?

Beasley believes that with today's fluid movement of people and capital, an urban competition to attract growth and investment is developing. The winners of this competition will not be the cities that manage their traffic most efficiently, but those that inspire an emotional urban relationship with its citizens and visitors.

The great cities of the future will be the ones that successfully reintroduce the human spirit into their urban environment. Cities that invest in creative architecture, public art, green space and the urban streetscape while promoting vibrancy through density and mixed-use development will be the ones that rekindle an urban love affair with its people. The modern transient economy will no longer settle for inhumane solutions to urban design.

Beasley maintains when people fall in love with their city, a snowball effect occurs.

The typical public malaise for issues of design quality fade away as people take greater pride and interest in their built environment. Neighbourhood design guidelines and review committees form as citizens re-engage in the dialogue of making their city a better place.

No longer is development accepted blindly, but scrutinized for its architectural quality and neighbourhood appropriateness. Architects and developers are forced to consider issues beyond their individual buildings and find solutions that respond appropriately to the public needs of the community.

Ask any Winnipegger which street they love most. The answer will probably not be Regent or Kenaston but more likely Broadway, Corydon or Wellington Crescent.

These streets possess the character and identity that evokes a personal connection to place. This emotional response can be a design objective for all areas of development, from new suburbs to the restoration of core-area neighbourhoods.

Our young people do not flock to cities like Vancouver looking for bigger roads and better parking. They are searching for a city to be in love with. Jogging along the sea wall, shopping on Robson or taking the Sky Train to work, are the types of experiences they are seeking and we must provide in order to compete.

Over the years, Winnipeg has been a difficult place to love.

Our civic leadership has generally been reactive to short-term gain, instead of working toward a cohesive vision for our city.

Our architecture has often met only the lowest standards of quality in materiality, composition and contextual relationship. We have long been content with development for development's sake and have often ignored issues of beauty, style and personal engagement in the design of our communities.

Allowing cherished historic buildings to be demolished, the proliferation of windswept parking lots and the complete banishment of people from the corner of Portage and Main are all examples of this lack of consideration for the human experience in our urban planning. It is difficult to fall in love with those concrete barriers.

The results of incorporating elegance and beauty into what could have been a pragmatic piece of infrastructure can be seen with Esplanade Riel. When under construction, it was widely criticized as a needless extravagance, but the emotional connection we have to it today has established it as a beloved civic icon.

Larry Beasley has challenged us to follow the lead of projects like this, to look beyond zoning and transportation patterns and to view our urban design through the lens of human experience. By constructing places from the downtown core to the farthest suburbs that are beautiful, joyful and capable of inspiring an emotional response, we will reignite our civic passion for this city.

By promoting inspirational architecture, vibrant public spaces that foster social engagement, as well as efficient transportation systems, we will begin to see a social, economic and physical transformation of our city while revealing the true power of an urban love affair.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1932  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2011, 9:00 PM
bryanscott's Avatar
bryanscott bryanscott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 285
Agreed. Excellent article—thank you.
__________________
Bryan Scott
http://winnipeglovehate.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1933  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2011, 10:14 PM
bicycles bicycles is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 220
great article and a pretty interesting tie in today: over $300 million budgeted for Disraeli freeway and CPT extension...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1934  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2011, 11:30 PM
bomberguy's Avatar
bomberguy bomberguy is offline
GQMF
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 656
TV for mayor!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1935  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2011, 5:52 AM
ihatesquirrels ihatesquirrels is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 323
Browsing the Manitoba Historical Society's site I came across two old city maps that might be worth a look if you happen to be into that sort of thing.

from 1908: http://www.mhs.mb.ca/data/census/191...nnipeg1908.jpg

From 1920: http://www.mhs.mb.ca/data/census/191...nnipeg1920.jpg

Check out square H19 (bottom left) on the 1920 map... I wonder if that intersection caused any controversy 91 years ago?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1936  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2011, 6:04 AM
Bdog's Avatar
Bdog Bdog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,228
^ Great stuff squirrels... It's interesting to see how street names have changed over the past century...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1937  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2011, 6:05 AM
JustinL's Avatar
JustinL JustinL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Winnipeg / Stuttgart
Posts: 186
@ihatesquirrels

Thanks for that, that's really cool. Its neat to see - the house I grew up in was just inside the city limits in 1908.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1938  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2011, 6:09 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,705
Quote:
Originally Posted by j.online View Post
Another great article TV. (except... Sex and the City?... really???)
.
ha ha...thanks guys.

you have to engage every demographic....its all about the ratings.

i actually got more response to this article than any other since the pedestrian mall one....there is a real pent up desire to make winnipeg a better city...it was encouraging....i was getting phone calls and e-mails all day long.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1939  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2011, 4:45 PM
hexrae's Avatar
hexrae hexrae is offline
Armchair urbanist
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 922
Quote:
First Nations, feds tussle over Kapyong land
Former barracks site vacant since 2004
By: Bruce Owen
Posted: 02/23/2011 1:00 AM

A three-judge panel reserved its decision Tuesday in a case that's delayed the redevelopment of the former Kapyong Barracks site in south Winnipeg.

The three judges of the Federal Court of Appeal spent the day hearing lawyers argue over whether Ottawa should sell the 64-hectare site to two First Nations as part of their treaty land entitlements.
It's still my hope that both sides can co-operate and come to a mutually beneficial solution. From the tone of this article though, it appears that the 'barriers' that separate us will keep that from happening. Shame.
__________________
[Insert profound statement here]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1940  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2011, 4:50 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,705
http://www.calgaryherald.com/enterta...139/story.html

came across this article about a former ssp poster....
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:42 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.