HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


View Poll Results: Which Chicago casino proposal is your favorite?
Ballys at Tribune 32 19.88%
Ballys at McCormick 9 5.59%
Hard Rock at One Central 13 8.07%
Rivers at The 78 86 53.42%
Rivers at McCormick 21 13.04%
Voters: 161. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1901  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2025, 2:00 PM
dewbs dewbs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 157
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1902  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2025, 3:52 PM
BrickellBased BrickellBased is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 603
Oh now they are cooking

Steel will go up super fast. This should be fun.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dewbs View Post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1903  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2025, 5:27 PM
lakeshoredrive lakeshoredrive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 522
Nice to see a big development actually happening. I really do hope this will spur further development around the area. I know there are some proposals, but who know if they will end up happening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1904  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2025, 9:36 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,338
Maybe its the viewpoint but the riverwalk area at least north end does not look that wide.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1905  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2025, 11:15 PM
BrickellBased BrickellBased is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
Maybe its the viewpoint but the riverwalk area at least north end does not look that wide.
https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city...D1426-RevisedSitePlanApproval-Casino.pdf

Page 39: TLDR the setback from the casino to the water will be 30' and the pedestrian path will be 16' minimum. There are sections A-E where design varies.

I think it's actually the same as the distance as near the hotel on the south end (Section D I believe in the PDF), it's just a bit of a perspective issue. The Tribune lot is enormous and so is the casino and from this angle it looks small. Also the construction fencing obscures it further up.

There will also be floating planters and terraced overlook on section A extending out into the river a bit.

16' is pretty generous and some sections of the south riverwalk downtown I think are 8' which is one of my only real gripes about the current riverwalk.

I think they allotted way too much space for boat docking which is used like 2% of total time people are spending down there year round. I wish some sections came out further and had no boat docs. There are so many 90 degree angle bottlenecks there

Last edited by BrickellBased; Oct 4, 2025 at 11:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1906  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2025, 11:40 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakeshoredrive View Post
Nice to see a big development actually happening. I really do hope this will spur further development around the area. I know there are some proposals, but who know if they will end up happening.
The one nearby project that I'd like to see happen, which seems more like a concrete plan compared to the conceptual placeholders rendering text to the casino, is the "NOMA" Salvation Army redevelopment. It called for an adaptive reuse of the SA building into a boutique hotel plus some ground-up towers, one exceeded 600 feet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1907  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2025, 6:19 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,778
10.05.25




__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1908  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2025, 10:44 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,778
10.10.25
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1909  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2025, 1:27 PM
dewbs dewbs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 157
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1910  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2025, 2:11 PM
dewbs dewbs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 157
Filling in along the river, both to the north and connecting to the tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1911  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2025, 4:53 PM
cloudbod cloudbod is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Chicago
Posts: 220
I was really surprised by the scale of this thing when I swung by on Tuesday-- these first few levels are gonna be absolutely cavernous. Are these triple- or quadruple-height ceilings??



Look how tiny the workers are by comparison!



Also, watching four cranes operate simultaneously is pretty hypnotic:

__________________
Chi freelance designer / game dev / alley rat
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1912  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2025, 11:49 PM
BrickellBased BrickellBased is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by cloudbod View Post
I was really surprised by the scale of this thing when I swung by on Tuesday-- these first few levels are gonna be absolutely cavernous. Are these triple- or quadruple-height ceilings??



Look how tiny the workers are by comparison!



Also, watching four cranes operate simultaneously is pretty hypnotic:
Not sure those are the final heights. Looks like they are bisecting some of the floors starting on the north side of the building. Not sure what the renderings show though as the final.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1913  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2025, 12:02 AM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,733
A few weeks ago, I griped about how this would never be completed by next fall/winter, per the owner’s schedule. I take back that comment lol.
I’m impressed at how quickly this is flying.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1914  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2025, 12:10 AM
BrickellBased BrickellBased is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
A few weeks ago, I griped about how this would never be completed by next fall/winter, per the owner’s schedule. I take back that comment lol.
I’m impressed at how quickly this is flying.
Often $1.7B projects like this take 5+ years to complete. Getting this done in ~18 months is a big shot of development downtown in a very short time window.

Also with the 78 Chicago Fire Stadium, Spire site finally redeveloped, and Google rennovation, downtown is quietly rocking in what seems like a down cycle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1915  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2025, 3:24 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrickellBased View Post
Often $1.7B projects like this take 5+ years to complete. Getting this done in ~18 months is a big shot of development downtown in a very short time window.

Also with the 78 Chicago Fire Stadium, Spire site finally redeveloped, and Google rennovation, downtown is quietly rocking in what seems like a down cycle.
That's the power of having not one, large general contractor, but a consortium of 5-6 large GCs, working in unison.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1916  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2025, 12:55 AM
Cress3803 Cress3803 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2024
Posts: 68
what was the final height on the tower?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1917  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2025, 2:23 AM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cress3803 View Post
what was the final height on the tower?
I have it marked at 447 feet - 34 stories, but feel free to correct me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1918  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2025, 4:43 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by cloudbod View Post
I was really surprised by the scale of this thing when I swung by on Tuesday-- these first few levels are gonna be absolutely cavernous. Are these triple- or quadruple-height ceilings??
Not unusual for a large hotel.

Also that middle section between the tower and the casino is where the theater will go, so you've got different floor heights in the theater to line up with. The lower levels of the tower may serve as lobby and prefunction spaces for the theater, or ballrooms and meeting spaces. That means jumbo-sized HVAC systems, supplemental structure for movable partitions, complex AV systems, etc.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...

Last edited by ardecila; Oct 20, 2025 at 4:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1919  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2025, 8:52 PM
dewbs dewbs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 157
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1920  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2025, 12:28 AM
lakeshoredrive lakeshoredrive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 522
Wow! The casino portion should be topped out soon enough, even if it's not monumental.

Last edited by sentinel; Nov 2, 2025 at 1:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:01 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.