HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


    The St. Regis Chicago in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2017, 5:59 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Yesterday the Tribune reported:

About 1/3 under contract
6 of 21 uber luxury units are under contract, including an $8.6 million penthouse
Many of the buyers are believed to be foreign, as predicted
Construction financing is expected to close in 45 to 60 days

Keep a close eye on this, guys. If Vista is a success we may see a lot more Chinese money "parked" locally, and perhaps many more high profile condo proposals
1/3 under contract is pretty decent for still being 3 years away from delivery. The sales center has been open for less than a year.

The facade looks promising as well.. all things are looking up for this project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2017, 8:08 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Yesterday the Tribune reported:

About 1/3 under contract
6 of 21 uber luxury units are under contract, including an $8.6 million penthouse
Many of the buyers are believed to be foreign, as predicted
Construction financing is expected to close in 45 to 60 days

Keep a close eye on this, guys. If Vista is a success we may see a lot more Chinese money "parked" locally, and perhaps many more high profile condo proposals

There's no hard info that I've seen whatsoever thus far on the depth of the foreign buyer market here. You misread that article. There was one sentiment-driven wishy-washy statement from a local broker that seemed to suggest (in all probability misleadingly) that there's been a half-decent amount of foreign interest/purchase activity. Potentially on the contrary, a statement from Sean Linnane of Magellan in the Trib article (http://www.chicagotribune.com/busine...302-story.html) is very suggestive that the market for units in the tower is actually primarily local (which makes more sense to me):

"We're surprised by the depth of the Chicago market. Most buyers are Chicago buyers — a lot buying second homes; often with a place in the suburbs."

In other words, no huge change from the luxury downtown Chicago new construction condo market in the boom of the naughts.

Do not be surprised if there is not in fact a deep market that develops for Chinese (I don't mean the ethnicity, I mean capital originating from mainland China) purchases of uber-luxury Chicago residential condos, new construction or otherwise. First of all, do not overlook the important widespread expectation that Chinese authorities will further clamp down on outbound capital this year. That could have a huge impact on residential investment in markets (NY, SF, LA, Vancouver, Toronto, etc) that actually do enjoy strong capital inflows into for-sale residential markets from China. Secondly, a relative lack of supply constraints more than compensates for some improvement in Chicago's global visibility and the 'safe harbor' status of investing in 1) the US in general, and 2) Chicago's less cyclically-amplified market....

Finally, it would be a very admirable feat if Magellan is in fact able to land its debt financing for this project in the next couple months. That's awesome that they are that close, and I'm pulling for them. That stated, I'm not impressed with the unit sales velocity here of late. It seems that it may have taken at least 7-8 months to move from 25% of units under contract to 33% of units under contract. While not necessarily problematic, that's less than swift, for certain....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2017, 9:01 PM
IrishIllini IrishIllini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
There's no hard info that I've seen whatsoever thus far on the depth of the foreign buyer market here. You misread that article. There was one sentiment-driven wishy-washy statement from a local broker that seemed to suggest (in all probability misleadingly) that there's been a half-decent amount of foreign interest/purchase activity. Potentially on the contrary, a statement from Sean Linnane of Magellan in the Trib article (http://www.chicagotribune.com/busine...302-story.html) is very suggestive that the market for units in the tower is actually primarily local (which makes more sense to me):

"We're surprised by the depth of the Chicago market. Most buyers are Chicago buyers — a lot buying second homes; often with a place in the suburbs."

In other words, no huge change from the luxury downtown Chicago new construction condo market in the boom of the naughts.

Do not be surprised if there is not in fact a deep market that develops for Chinese (I don't mean the ethnicity, I mean capital originating from mainland China) purchases of uber-luxury Chicago residential condos, new construction or otherwise. First of all, do not overlook the important widespread expectation that Chinese authorities will further clamp down on outbound capital this year. That could have a huge impact on residential investment in markets (NY, SF, LA, Vancouver, Toronto, etc) that actually do enjoy strong capital inflows into for-sale residential markets from China. Secondly, a relative lack of supply constraints more than compensates for some improvement in Chicago's global visibility and the 'safe harbor' status of investing in 1) the US in general, and 2) Chicago's less cyclically-amplified market....

Finally, it would be a very admirable feat if Magellan is in fact able to land its debt financing for this project in the next couple months. That's awesome that they are that close, and I'm pulling for them. That stated, I'm not impressed with the unit sales velocity here of late. It seems that it may have taken at least 7-8 months to move from 25% of units under contract to 33% of units under contract. While not necessarily problematic, that's less than swift, for certain....
Well the building isn't expected to open until 2020, so I'd say 1/3 of the units being sold when it's three years from delivery isn't too shabby. It'll be interesting to see how things play out in China, but it's my understanding that Chinese immigration to Chicago is on the upswing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2017, 9:06 PM
Notyrview Notyrview is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,648
I'm really stoked about that sample cladding. I think the building might have a cool lego quality to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2017, 2:57 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by IrishIllini View Post
Well the building isn't expected to open until 2020, so I'd say 1/3 of the units being sold when it's three years from delivery isn't too shabby. It'll be interesting to see how things play out in China, but it's my understanding that Chinese immigration to Chicago is on the upswing.

Chinese immigration to Chicago is indeed increasing.....I see it all the time in the near south and southwest neighborhoods.....however, this has little to do with the hoped-for (in some quarters) connection between China and multimillion dollar downtown condos - that's more about offshore investment from high net worth individuals.....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2017, 12:44 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
There's no hard info that I've seen whatsoever thus far on the depth of the foreign buyer market here. You misread that article. There was one sentiment-driven wishy-washy statement from a local broker that seemed to suggest (in all probability misleadingly) that there's been a half-decent amount of foreign interest/purchase activity. Potentially on the contrary, a statement from Sean Linnane of Magellan in the Trib article (http://www.chicagotribune.com/busine...302-story.html) is very suggestive that the market for units in the tower is actually primarily local (which makes more sense to me):

"We're surprised by the depth of the Chicago market. Most buyers are Chicago buyers — a lot buying second homes; often with a place in the suburbs."

In other words, no huge change from the luxury downtown Chicago new construction condo market in the boom of the naughts.

Do not be surprised if there is not in fact a deep market that develops for Chinese (I don't mean the ethnicity, I mean capital originating from mainland China) purchases of uber-luxury Chicago residential condos, new construction or otherwise. First of all, do not overlook the important widespread expectation that Chinese authorities will further clamp down on outbound capital this year. That could have a huge impact on residential investment in markets (NY, SF, LA, Vancouver, Toronto, etc) that actually do enjoy strong capital inflows into for-sale residential markets from China. Secondly, a relative lack of supply constraints more than compensates for some improvement in Chicago's global visibility and the 'safe harbor' status of investing in 1) the US in general, and 2) Chicago's less cyclically-amplified market....

Finally, it would be a very admirable feat if Magellan is in fact able to land its debt financing for this project in the next couple months. That's awesome that they are that close, and I'm pulling for them. That stated, I'm not impressed with the unit sales velocity here of late. It seems that it may have taken at least 7-8 months to move from 25% of units under contract to 33% of units under contract. While not necessarily problematic, that's less than swift, for certain....
If you do the math it is 1 sale per week for about 8 months. If you look at the price points (which are the top of the Chicago market) and we accept that this is happening without oceans of foreign money, I would call the sales fairly respectable (not amazing). I revise my own earlier thoughts on this topic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2017, 2:07 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
March 6, 2017









Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2017, 2:41 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,570
^ Awesome update....thanks.


I know it's been said before, but it needs to be said again and again: this is one helluva impressive operation by Mchugh......the incredibly favorable winter weather continues, but even so, I'm not sure if I've ever been this impressed by a single act of construction management as I have by the first 15-20% of this project's lifespan.......


Smooth and ahead of schedule are humble understatements....

....knock on concrete.....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2017, 6:26 AM
CastleScott CastleScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sacramento Ca/formerly CastleRock Co
Posts: 1,055
This project is really moving along and I wonder if the mild winter also really helped-impressive!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2017, 6:37 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,792
Is there another skyscraper in the world with two roads going through it?
The closest I could think of is the Helmsley building in New York though Park Ave is technically one road.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2017, 6:47 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlw777 View Post
Is there another skyscraper in the world with two roads going through it?
The closest I could think of is the Helmsley building in New York though Park Ave is technically one road.
Lol the Old Post Office?
__________________
Washed Out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2017, 7:02 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandonJXN View Post
Lol the Old Post Office?
Nah I think of Congress pkwy as one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2017, 12:44 PM
Kenmore Kenmore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Uptown
Posts: 652
I'm significantly more bearish on the long term health of the Chicago condo market than most on this board, really just hoping we get this one in before the bottom falls out (again) because it's going to be a stunner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2017, 9:37 PM
excel excel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,484
Amazing how fast this is being built. Thanks for the updates.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2017, 1:31 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by excel View Post
Amazing how fast this is being built. Thanks for the updates.
No kidding - pretty good. There is a building being constructed near my office at Hudson Yards in Manhattan which has only jumped 1-2 floors in the last 3 months - complete opposite of this
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2017, 3:30 AM
officeworker officeworker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 39
Saturday 3/11

















Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2017, 1:58 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,970
March 7




It appears the climbing form is supported from inside mounts.










__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2017, 12:36 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657




Taken from 79th floor at Aqua on 3/11.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2017, 3:34 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,285
They must have like 50+ guys working on this during one shift. This thing is moving given the complexity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2017, 5:02 AM
intrepidDesign's Avatar
intrepidDesign intrepidDesign is offline
Windy City Dan
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 506
Engineering question: What are they going to use to span between the two cores? Is it going to be some heavy steel truss like we saw at 150? Or is it going to me more of a series of reinforced concrete sections like what went over the tracks at the confluence. I would imagine a park is one thing, but a mid rise is another, so I'm guessing steel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:32 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.