HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1861  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2009, 7:06 PM
WeST's Avatar
WeST WeST is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Murray
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanboy View Post
Or perhaps land for a community permaculture garden. Unless you don't think food is a good investment.
No food is a waste of time, I was thinking that land could be more useful for something like this:



Actually do think food is a good idea and a permaculture garden would be great as long as it is run by a private organization. I don't want the city running gardens and getting involved in that business. Further, I do question whether the idea of trying to make the Wasatch Front totally self-sustaining is wise. We have scarce water resources so producing the food in regions that get plenty of water, such as the Central Valley in California seems to be a better use of resources.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1862  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2009, 7:08 PM
urbanboy urbanboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,120


We have enough water, we just waste so much of it on grassy lawns.


I think the layers of a farm scraper give the food and watering process an advantage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1863  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2009, 7:21 PM
WeST's Avatar
WeST WeST is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Murray
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanboy View Post


We have enough water, we just waste so much of it on grassy lawns.


I think the layers of a farm scraper give the food and watering process an advantage.

Well this is a chart from 2000 that breaks down water usage in Utah. I am not convinced you are right about "grassy lawns" being the biggest problem. I believe public supply is the "grassy lawns" issue


Source: Utah Foundation- http://www.utahfoundation.org/reports/?page_id=331
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1864  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2009, 2:51 AM
WeST's Avatar
WeST WeST is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Murray
Posts: 340
Delta suspending Salt Lake City-to-Tokyo flights


http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=7515452

This hurts. Hopefully this isn't a nice way of canceling it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1865  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2009, 3:37 AM
wrendog's Avatar
wrendog wrendog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 4,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeST View Post
We have scarce water resources so producing the food in regions that get plenty of water, such as the Central Valley in California seems to be a better use of resources.
Since when did the Central Valley get plenty of water? It's a desert. Canals, irrigation, you name it. We get more water here than they do in the Central Valley. The soil is more fertile, so that's why the grow so much. If you are solely referring to the Sacramento Valley, they get about 20 inches a year whereas SL valley gets around 18. The southern Central valley gets very little rain. I lived in Bakersfield for 2 years. It was dusty, dry and miserable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1866  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2009, 1:55 PM
cololi cololi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrendog View Post
I lived in Bakersfield for 2 years. It was dusty, dry and miserable.
That may be the understatement of the year. Bakersfield sucks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1867  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2009, 9:59 PM
goldcntry's Avatar
goldcntry goldcntry is offline
West bench livin'
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Daybreak (So. Jordan), UT
Posts: 791
Absolutely... The Central Valley at the time of John Sutter and the Gold Rush was dry desert and/or grass lands with swampy rivers that met into one big swampy delta. Irrigation ditches, levees (sp), upland resevoirs all turned the accumulated sierra silt into the bread basket the San Jouquin Valley is today... but turn off the water... empty the resevoirs to save a two-inch fish from extinction (delta smelt) and the valley dries up like Kanab after a rainstorm. I remember building 'snowmen' out of tumbleweeds when we lived in Manteca when I was a kid before all the developments made Manteca a bed-bug community (a.k.a. suburban sprawl run amok)...

__________________
Giant Meteor 2024
Just end it all already.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1868  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2009, 3:19 AM
WeST's Avatar
WeST WeST is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Murray
Posts: 340
Compromise in works on potential TRAX site on Indian village

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/70532...-on-Indian-village.html?linkTrack=rss-30

Gov. Gary Herbert was meeting today with officials from the Utah Transit Authority, and the environmental and Native American communities to discuss a sensitive piece of land in Draper that has been eyed as a future FrontRunner South Commuter Rail station.

The property, at roughly 13500 South near the Jordan River, is the site of a 3,000-year-old Native American village that may have served as a winter camping quarters for several generations of hunter-gatherer groups.

Today, the land is one of a few undeveloped swaths along the Jordan River, and environmentalists want it to remain that way since migratory birds en route to the Great Salt Lake frequent the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1869  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2009, 3:25 AM
urbanboy urbanboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,120


I think this is great news! Good work Governor Herbert!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1870  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2009, 6:20 PM
urbanboy urbanboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,120
U Car Share offers Utahns a new way to get around town

http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=7584771
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1871  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2009, 6:33 PM
WeST's Avatar
WeST WeST is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Murray
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanboy View Post
U Car Share offers Utahns a new way to get around town

http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=7584771
I am a big fan of this program. I think that this is a significant step toward making areas of the valley mass transit friendly. I hope they dramatically expand the scope of this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1872  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2009, 7:02 PM
i-215's Avatar
i-215 i-215 is offline
Exit 298
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Inland Empire (CA)
Posts: 3,483


I hope it works. I wonder if U-Haul will find their cars all trashed out 6 months from now.

I mean, just look at their trucks.
__________________
I've stopped caring. Good luck, America
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1873  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2009, 10:16 PM
WeST's Avatar
WeST WeST is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Murray
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by i-215 View Post


I hope it works. I wonder if U-Haul will find their cars all trashed out 6 months from now.

I mean, just look at their trucks.
I thought the same thing. If they do it right then it should not receive anymore wear and tear than a rental car would. The biggest thing that you can do is require members to pass a credit check. There are a lot of slobs and knuckleheads that would be weeded out through that check. If anyone is able to, then those cars will get hammered pretty fast.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1874  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2009, 10:42 PM
Future Mayor's Avatar
Future Mayor Future Mayor is offline
Vote for me in 2019!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,803
You have to have a U Car membership card, which is what you swipe to get into the car. This will allow them to track who had it when. I love this idea, there are a lot of things that SLC and the Wasatch Front that many larger cities and metro area would love to have, such as this, light rail and commuter rail. I love it here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1875  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2009, 11:03 PM
jtrent77 jtrent77 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 571
U Car Share

I'm surprised that ZipCar (www.zipcar.com) didn't get in there first, but I guess right now they are just in the much bigger cities. They have been in D.C. for quite a while now. Many areas actually have designated parking spots for the zipcars (this is for the unused car to be parked, not for a zipcar to park in when they take it to the grocery store for example) so that they are easily accessible by everyone.

Obviously the program is just starting in Utah and thus is going to be quite limited for at least a while, but to become more successful I would imagine that they are going to have to have zipcars available in areas that may not be next door to a mass transit station but are in a densely populated area...sugarhouse might be a good option. It would also be wise of them to start the program with cars at BYU since that campus is must more of a people living close by without necessarily have cars.

Finally, I hope the program does work in Utah, but it is easier in areas when you only occassionally need a car--maybe once a week or so; start getting much higher than that and the economics start going down a bit (and yes i realize it includes gas and insurance).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1876  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2009, 5:58 PM
esirhgih's Avatar
esirhgih esirhgih is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salt Lake
Posts: 188
UTA Change day is next week.
A link to the changes is here:
http://www.rideuta.com/ridingUTA/routeChanges/default.aspx

Notably, there is new regular TRAX service (every 30 min.) from Sandy to University:



Also, the travel time on FrontRunner has been reduced by 6 minutes.

This was kind of interesting, they've also added 3 new routes called "Lifts", which will deviate from their regular routes by up to 3/4 of a mile if you make arrangements ahead of time and pay an extra dollar. I suppose this is a good alternative given that there are in areas with little transit use. It will make it easier for people to get to the bus without adding routes that wouldn't be used except by a single person. It will be interesting to see how they play out over time.

http://www.rideuta.com/utaInfo/bannerDet...ageBannerID=135&bannerMode=Random+Images
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1877  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2009, 1:41 AM
cololi cololi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 690

notably, no Sandy trains go to Central Station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1878  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2009, 3:26 PM
WeST's Avatar
WeST WeST is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Murray
Posts: 340
Does anyone know the build out time frame for the Intermodal Hub? It seems to be about a third the size of what it eventually will be. What else are they planning on adding? I know Greyhound, TRAX and commuter rail are there, but what else? Is it just added capacity as things get busier?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1879  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2009, 10:31 PM
ski_steve ski_steve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 467
S. Salt Lake joins Utah capital's bid for streetcar cash

South Salt Lake has agreed to pony up $2.5 million if the federal government pitches in $35 million to build the Sugar House streetcar.

Last week, Salt Lake City also approved a $2.5 million match -- the other half of a required local pledge -- to snatch a "TIGER" grant, part of federal stimulus funds.

The money would cover the bulk of the cost of the $46 million, two-mile rail line, connecting a TRAX station at 2100 South and 250 West to the Sugar House business district.

Grant recipients are expected to be announced in January. If Salt Lake City and South Salt Lake score the funds, the streetcar could be completed in early 2012.

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_13215884?source=rss
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1880  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2009, 11:08 PM
WeST's Avatar
WeST WeST is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Murray
Posts: 340
Utah worries new bill will short-shrift roads

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_12931963

"Utah transportation officials fear a proposed six-year federal highway-spending bill will siphon money from new roads in growing states like Utah and reward transit systems instead.

They also worry the proposed Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act of 2009 puts more authority in federal hands."

"I'm also in favor of transit," said Commissioner Meghan Holbrook, who represents Salt Lake County, "but in reality we have to be very much in favor of roads."

The last transportation reauthorization, six years ago, steered about 82 percent of federal dollars to highways and 18 percent to mass transit. The new bill would make the split about 78-22, although both would get tens of billions more than last time. Another $50 billion would go to several planned intercity high-speed rail lines, using a new federal "infrastructure bank."

"The Utah Transportation Commission voted last week to write a letter opposing that direction to the bill's sponsor, Rep. James Oberstar, D-Minn., chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee."




I don't remember this story being posted before.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:28 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.