HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


View Poll Results: Which transbay tower design scheme do you like best?
#1 Richard Rogers 40 8.05%
#2 Cesar Pelli 99 19.92%
#3 SOM 358 72.03%
Voters: 497. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1801  
Old Posted May 19, 2008, 12:08 AM
nequidnimis nequidnimis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 507
Quote:
Originally Posted by c1tyguy View Post
^ Haha interesting point.. never thought about that. Maybe it will have a self-cleaning mechanism like the Pyramide du Louvre in Paris.
I believe the Pyramide du Louvre is washed by trained mountain climbers. I am not sure OSHA regulations (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) would allow it in the US, although if a building is low enough, not all OSHA regulations may apply.

Last edited by nequidnimis; May 19, 2008 at 3:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1802  
Old Posted May 19, 2008, 1:28 AM
c1tyguy c1tyguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 65
^ Haha. Robots actually clean it.. kind of like those pool cleaners, or the iRobot vacuum. They're on a track or something.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1803  
Old Posted May 19, 2008, 4:08 AM
nequidnimis nequidnimis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 507
You are right. The Robuglass robot is actually a 2003 improvement. I was not aware of it. Here is a link to a picture showing the mountaineers:
http://photos.linternaute.com/photo/...ide-du-louvre/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1804  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2008, 5:50 PM
damitdud damitdud is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by nequidnimis View Post
This design will require some elaborate window washing equipment. Not to mention the problem of washing the glass on the inside. Unless no one at the TJPA intends to wash the glass... or the design is all "straightened" as it proceeds from concept to construction. Also, some of the glass panes are warped surfaces: I doubt glass is available in such shapes.
of course glass is available in warped surfaces. havent you seen a car windshield? otherwise we would all be driving scions, or ghasp! hummers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1805  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2008, 6:20 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
I'm a little confused about this thread and http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...122300&page=11 but I guess this one is just the tower itself and the other one is the Piano project--or maybe not. Anyway, I posted on the other one a reference to the new "urban form" renderings and much, much more available at http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfi...view_INDEX.htm and I also posted a sample of the renderings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1806  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2008, 3:08 AM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,233
Yes, this is the Transbay tower (and the new transit center -- for now) itself. The other thread is the former Piano towers proposal. I think that once the new center begins in ernest (say, the start of construction on the temporary terminal), we should start a new thread for it in General Development. Then this thread should be retitled to reflect the Pelli project. I never thought the shorter towers in this thread title referred to the Piano project. I thought those were references to the other towers on Howard and Fremont but maybe I was mistaken.
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1807  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2008, 4:28 AM
Reminiscence's Avatar
Reminiscence Reminiscence is offline
Green Berniecrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond/Eureka, CA
Posts: 1,689
As I understand it, this thread is for the Transbay Tower (Pelli's tower), the Transbay Terminal and the other two towers that were suppose to exceed 800' on Howard and Fremont as p.g. brought up in the last post. Piano's proposal, which I'd like to think is still on the table, is a separate proposal that I dont think has anything to do with Transbay, but is merely in the designated area for rezoning to increase heights.
__________________
Reject the lesser evil and fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it, because they do!
-- Dr. Jill Stein, 2016 Green Party Presidential Candidate
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1808  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2008, 6:28 PM
SFView SFView is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,071
The ">1000'" in this tread title refers to the Transbay Tower. One of the ">800'" towers has become the Piano site returned to 800' from five towers at 600'-1200'. The other ">800'" tower is the "TJPA" tower site on Howard Street, closer to 2nd Street now at 700'.

This thread originally included discussion of all three locations. Now it has become this:

Source: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object...MNO010BB08.DTL

Should new threads be created to discuss the Transbay Tower, Transbay Transit Center (General Development also?), and TJPA Howard, etc., separately; just as has been created for Piano, 350 Mission, and 181 Fremont? Should this thread remain as general discussion for Transbay as a whole, but not move be moved to General Development?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1809  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2008, 4:07 AM
Reminiscence's Avatar
Reminiscence Reminiscence is offline
Green Berniecrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond/Eureka, CA
Posts: 1,689
Thanks for the info SFView. That cleared up some confusion I had as well. In my opinion, we should keep it as it is now until we start to hear some more serious talks about these projects respectively. Transbay, once work begins on the temporary terminal, should be moved to the "Supertall Construction" forum to reflect the nature of the tower centerpiece. While that thread is there, we might as well post news and pictures regarding the terminals, both temporary and permanent once work begins there also because articles are probably going to refer to both sections in the same article. I guess it would be something like Millenium Tower and 301 Mission (the main tower and its midrise). Both are buildings of the same project and therefore are under the same thread with the tower being the main purpose.
__________________
Reject the lesser evil and fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it, because they do!
-- Dr. Jill Stein, 2016 Green Party Presidential Candidate
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1810  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2008, 3:05 AM
dempsey hillman dempsey hillman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 19
san francisco is an incredible city and I love the idea of a 1400 foot skyscraper complex complet with a trainterminal GO FOR IT!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1811  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2008, 5:32 AM
rajaxsonbayboi's Avatar
rajaxsonbayboi rajaxsonbayboi is offline
Pizza Pizza
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: bay area
Posts: 84
wow i came back a month later and nothing much updated......sigh....any dates coming up that we should be excited for?
__________________
l'architecture est le breuvage magique ce des feuls ma vie.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1812  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2008, 5:40 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088


Quote:
The Transbay Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) usually meets on the second Thursday of every month at 5:30 p.m. at Yerba Buena Center for the Arts, 701 Mission Street, 2nd Floor Conference Room. Click on the link below for this month's agenda.
Current Agenda (doc) - Thursday, June 12, 2008 .
Transbay CAC HousingPresentation (PowerPoint) - from the March 14, 2007 meeting
PowerPoint presentation (PDF): "Transbay Downtown Heights Study" - from May 31, 2006 meeting
Source: http://www.sfgov.org/site/sfra_page.asp?id=5583#CAC

As things move along, you can keep up with dates you should be excited about at http://www.sfgov.org/site/sfra_page.asp?id=5583
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1813  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2008, 8:45 PM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,233
The next visible sign of progress on this that I'm looking forward to is the construction of the temporary terminal. I think that's supposed to start next winter.
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1814  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2008, 9:44 PM
Complex01's Avatar
Complex01 Complex01 is offline
Endless Moments...
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas...
Posts: 2,927
Wow now there is going to be a whole bunch of towers. Very Kewl. It will be fun to watch and see what happens...

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1815  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2008, 8:07 PM
NDPhilly's Avatar
NDPhilly NDPhilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: suburban philly,PA(Glen Mills)
Posts: 171
i would like to see renderings of all three of the designs of the transbay tower
__________________
my mini city - http://glen-mills.myminicity.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1816  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2008, 8:11 PM
Reminiscence's Avatar
Reminiscence Reminiscence is offline
Green Berniecrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond/Eureka, CA
Posts: 1,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDPhilly View Post
i would like to see renderings of all three of the designs of the transbay tower
Even though they've been periodically posted throughout the thread, check out the first page of the rundown thread. They're on there, plus everything else going on right now.

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=24868
__________________
Reject the lesser evil and fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it, because they do!
-- Dr. Jill Stein, 2016 Green Party Presidential Candidate
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1817  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2008, 11:45 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
181 Fremont

I tidbit or two from the SF Biztimes (not online yet):

"proposed at 900 ft but planners would like to see it at 700 ft. Just steps from the Transit Center, the razor-thin tower would be clad in high-performance glass to screen out solar heat gain."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1818  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2008, 6:20 AM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,233
That height makes sense with a 1000' Transbay tower. I like the sound of "razor-thin."
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1819  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2008, 8:50 PM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,233
There are notices around the temporary terminal site that the trees on Main and Folsom will be removed in preparation for construction. It doesn't say exactly when, but given the notices will be posted until August 8, I'm guessing sometime in August. Maybe they'll start on it in the fall rather than winter?
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1820  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2008, 8:37 AM
Reminiscence's Avatar
Reminiscence Reminiscence is offline
Green Berniecrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond/Eureka, CA
Posts: 1,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut gallery View Post
There are notices around the temporary terminal site that the trees on Main and Folsom will be removed in preparation for construction. It doesn't say exactly when, but given the notices will be posted until August 8, I'm guessing sometime in August. Maybe they'll start on it in the fall rather than winter?
If I still remember right, construction is suppose to begin this fall. It would make sense for them to start site prep soon. I dont know if its been posted or if I just blocked it out of memory, but have they released a rendering for what the temporary terminal will look like. I doubt it will look just like what TJPA has on their site, will it?
__________________
Reject the lesser evil and fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it, because they do!
-- Dr. Jill Stein, 2016 Green Party Presidential Candidate
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:22 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.