Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy
It could be argued that the "giant skyscraper" is New York City's history, more than any other, but let's carry on about this hotel...
https://secretnyc.co/hotel-pennsylvania-nyc-demolition/
New York City’s Century-Old Hotel Pennsylvania Is Currently Being Demolished
To make way for a 1,200-foot skyscraper & development
|
"NYC is sadly losing another piece of history…to make way for another giant skyscraper." Yes as it has done for generations. Also a building just being part of NYC's history is no reason to care about it. You could appeal to the architectural merits of the hotel or even architectural
significance but just
being part of the history doesn't really mean anything.
"The developer most recently planned to build a 1,200-foot skyscraper there, following Governor Cuomo’s — and now Governor Hochul’s — massive Penn Station revitalization project." Just being pedantic but this was never to follow the Penn reno, nor is it connected to that except that it's in the area and Vornado is the developer.
"adding 10 supertall towers" That would great but it's not happening. Maybe 1 or 2 supertalls but most of it looks to be shorter than even Hudson Yards.
"yeah, I am not a fan of the Empire State Building (I prefer the Woolworth). Towers are okay if there a few great ones sprinkled around, but when they take over the city it's a problem." 1) Being a fan of one building doesn't mean you can't be a fan of another building. 2) How delusional. How many times must it be repeated what city this is. Towers took over the city a century ago, they are still being built and they will continue to.