Quote:
Originally Posted by hollywoodnorth
as per the listing >>
Zoning ING/ING2 (Industrial General/Industrial General Two Zone) and that Zoning info on Mission's Site >> https://map.mission.ca/Mission/image...Zones/INGC.pdf
I am pretty sure the real estate agent knows the right zoning when selling a site worth over 100 million dollars.
|
https://ehq-production-canada.s3.ca-...838a51b5c97209
Quote:
|
The commuter rail area, which is part of the Waterfront, is now a mix of light industrial and commercial uses. Due to its proximity to the West Coast Express station, downtown and the waterfront, this location has the potential to support high-density residential uses that are integrated with commercial and warehousing/wholesale land uses. It is an excellent location for affordable housing, especially for frequent transit users. This is a neighbourhood that will likely experience a gradual transition to more residential uses.
|
There's also a map there, on page 248, that contradicts their claims.
https://www.mission.ca/city-hall/dep...on-waterfront/
Quote:
We’ve established a comprehensive planning area, representing approximately 296 acres of land, that will guide a future for the waterfront that is complete, walkable and connected.
Revitalizing the waterfront has many benefits that move beyond Mission to the rest of the Fraser Valley and Lower Mainland and will increase access to opportunities, support sustainability, and drive investment and bold economic development.
Cities across the country are actively transforming their waterfronts to create vibrant new neighbourhoods with parks and trails, arts and cultural spaces, diverse housing options and innovative business spaces that incorporate important historical and cultural values.
A few examples of these waterfronts are happening in Halifax, Toronto, Winnipeg and Hamilton.
Council approved a bylaw to add the Waterfront Comprehensive Planning Area designation to the Official Community Plan Bylaw on Sept. 21, 2020.
|
They note that industrial land is in short supply, but still propose to go forwards with this, with the hope that they can rezone a different ALR parcel to industrial.
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/miss...-redevelopment
Quote:
A mix of housing options and types — including affordable housing and rentals — for up to 40,000 people could eventually be built in Southwest Mission, along with a mix of commercial and industrial jobs in Mission Waterfront, as well as a wide range of supporting infrastructure, public spaces, community amenities, cultural amenities, and green infrastructure.
It would be a transit-oriented community, oriented around an active transportation strategy, and with distinct precincts.
|
Note that this is a net
loss of industrial land, because the entire area is already zoned industrial. This is most likely a Flavelle Sawmill situation, where they put 1 small industrial building next to a bunch of towers covering 80% of the site so they can
technically meet the 'industrial' requirements.
The Mission OCP
literally states the area is critical to providing jobs for the Mission community and is barge and rail accessible. So they're going to kill the employment center of Mission for money.
These people are thinking along the same lines of the geniuses behind the Surrey Canal and LRT idea.