HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2013, 2:30 AM
Katrillion's Avatar
Katrillion Katrillion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 131
Red face

If he's going to demolish them, Blanchard should just do something like this
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2013, 2:47 AM
Dwils01's Avatar
Dwils01 Dwils01 is offline
Urban Fanactic
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 3,274
I don't think that fake historic building look a likes will make that site any better. We want the buildings to stay as they are.
Hamilton had so many great historic buildings and I would still like to keep the ones we have now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2013, 2:59 AM
Katrillion's Avatar
Katrillion Katrillion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 131
They're probably going to be demolished very soon, I'd rather have those fake look-a-likes rather than some random modern (probably stucco) building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2013, 3:39 AM
thmx thmx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,381
I am co-admin at facebook.com/VintageHamilton and we have started a petition. The petition serves as notice to Hamilton City Council that an emergency Council meeting should be held to require that any redevelopment of 24 and 28 King Street East, Hamilton Ontario should include the facades of both original buildings into the design of any new structures.

Click Here To Sign The Petition
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2013, 1:00 PM
movingtohamilton movingtohamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 994
^ If you have a twitter account, tweet this. I did.
__________________
Keep your hands and feet inside the virtual machine at all times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2013, 3:07 PM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
Good call on the petition. Cheers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2013, 10:57 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,859
I would like there to be an investigative article from the Spec about the buildings, their condition now versus when Blanchard bought them.

For example, David Premi's offices were in the buildings and I seem to remember there being Spec articles about how great it was being on the Gore. So suddenly Premi's offices are what, falling down? And if so, maybe that was Blanchard's responsibility to spend money to keep it in good condition. Other landlords in the city do that, including spending money on the roof.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2013, 11:46 PM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
^I'd love that, though the results would be fairly predictable.

These buildings can be saved, just not for what Blanchard's willing to pay. Personally, I think he's a fraud and a relic.

Betcha they don't do much demolition in Dresden, right? The thought of it probably makes people sick.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2013, 5:04 PM
Jon Dalton's Avatar
Jon Dalton Jon Dalton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,778
I'm sure David Blanchard can afford it. This is a massive project iin the hundreds of thousands of square feet and tens of millions of dollars. A million or two to prop up the facades is not a show stopper. I think they just don't give a shit.
__________________
360º of Hamilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2013, 4:02 PM
thmx thmx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,381
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2013, 3:06 AM
CaptainKirk CaptainKirk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
The demolition of two 19th-century buildings beside Gore Park will begin within two weeks as part of a controversial deal between the city and a developer to restore three properties and destroy two others.

Developer David Blanchard, of Wilson Blanchard, says the demolition of 24 and 28 King St. E. will take at least three weeks to complete. During the work, he expects the sidewalk will be closed but the street will remain open.

"We are keeping up three buildings and taking down two," said Blanchard, whose company has received a demolition permit from the city. "We are going ahead with everything we agreed to with the city."
http://www.thespec.com/news-story/38...ark-buildings/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2013, 3:18 AM
coalminecanary coalminecanary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,421
Demo crews arrive Monday.
__________________
no clever signoff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 5:54 AM
lucasmascotto's Avatar
lucasmascotto lucasmascotto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 356
Last-ditch bid to preserve venerable King Street buildings
Hamilton Spectator

The Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO) has sent a letter to city council urging a heritage designation for a row of King Street East buildings slated for demolition within weeks.

ACO president Richard Longley urged in his letter, sent Thursday, that the three pre-Confederation buildings at 18-22 King St. E. and the two late-Victorian buildings at 24 and 28 King St. E. be preserved rather than demolished.

"This is with a view to saving all of these buildings, that they might contribute once again to the life of Gore Park that is the city's heart," he wrote.

Property management company Wilson Blanchard, which owns the buildings, has a permit from the city for the demolition, which is scheduled to happen within two weeks.

Longley acknowledged a compromise made in January between the city and Wilson Blanchard that would see the facades of 18-22 preserved if a structural engineer deems them worth saving.

"Our deal with the city is to keep 18-22 and we're going to rip down 24 and 28," said developer David Blanchard.

Longley added that the buildings at 24 and 28, dating from the 1870s "are scheduled to be demolished completely (and) have been placed on Heritage Canada's 2013 list of top 10 most endangered places. "

Blanchard suggested the costs of maintaining the buildings make heritage designation unrealistic: "They're not worth putting money into. There is no sense in leaving them there and letting them rot like the Lister block did for 20 years," he said.

Ward 2 Jason Farr commented on the ACO letter and said the matter is out of council hands. He referred to the agreement made between the city and Wilson Blanchard: "For me, personally, I'm going to maintain the Jan. 23 compromise. I can tell you personally as the ward councillor, as someone who works with the heritage committee and with staff, I'm not going to seek an overturning of a unanimous council decision."

Possibilities for preserving the facades of 18-22 will be decided when Blanchard receives the structural engineer's assessment this week or next.

"Once we find out if they can be retained, we can find out what we can do to fix them and repair them. That's the economics, we don't know that yet," he said.

Longley said preserving only the facades would be disappointing but understandable. But he said the ACO would not understand "the complete demolition of buildings that have contributed so much and for so long and might continue to do so, well into the future, to Hamilton's history and culture."

If the buildings are demolished, Blanchard said new developments on that block would include retail spaces, condominiums and offices.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 4:50 PM
Jon Dalton's Avatar
Jon Dalton Jon Dalton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,778
Interesting how Council believes they have reached a compromise to save 18 - 22 King E., but Wilson Blanchard says they will yet decide if it's worth it.

Quote:
I'm going to maintain the Jan. 23 compromise. I can tell you personally as the ward councillor, as someone who works with the heritage committee and with staff, I'm not going to seek an overturning of a unanimous council decision."
But Wilson Blanchard can overturn a unanimous council decision - very quickly, with a bulldozer and a wrecking ball, permit in hand.
__________________
360º of Hamilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 5:13 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
Godwin's By-law

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Dalton View Post
Interesting how Council believes they have reached a compromise to save 18 - 22 King E., but Wilson Blanchard says they will yet decide if it's worth it.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 7:15 PM
bigguy1231 bigguy1231 is offline
Concerned Citizen
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Dalton View Post
Interesting how Council believes they have reached a compromise to save 18 - 22 King E., but Wilson Blanchard says they will yet decide if it's worth it.



But Wilson Blanchard can overturn a unanimous council decision - very quickly, with a bulldozer and a wrecking ball, permit in hand.
Most councillors see those buildings as an eyesore. They only made the deal to shut the few who really care about these buildings up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 7:51 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,302
Farr's Motion - Gore District Future Development – Heritage Buildings

http://www.hamilton.ca/NR/rdonlyres/...velopment_.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 7:55 PM
movingtohamilton movingtohamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigguy1231 View Post
Most councillors see those buildings as an eyesore. They only made the deal to shut the few who really care about these buildings up.
I tweeted this to councilors. Let's see what they say!
__________________
Keep your hands and feet inside the virtual machine at all times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 8:34 PM
Jon Dalton's Avatar
Jon Dalton Jon Dalton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,778
Quote:
Originally Posted by movingtohamilton View Post
I tweeted this to councilors. Let's see what they say!
I'm sure if that was actually their opinion, they wouldn't tweet it.
__________________
360º of Hamilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 8:38 PM
movingtohamilton movingtohamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 994
I'm sure they won't, but I want to see if they RT with any sort of flim-flammery reply!
__________________
Keep your hands and feet inside the virtual machine at all times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:55 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.