HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2014, 8:40 PM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Kildonan
Posts: 2,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by original View Post
"Catch up" is exactly what this is. Why do we have such bad infrastructure here? Can anyone give me a simple explanation? I know we had some flooding issues that apparently sucked up a large chunk of infrastructure money, but seriously... our roads are a joke.

I got the privilege to drive along Anthony Henday Drive in Edmonton last week. That is one hell of a drive. Then I came back home and realized how bad things really are. The more time I spend away in other cities, the more I realize how terrible our infrastructure really is.
Next time you should take a drive in Montreal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2014, 8:58 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by original View Post
Why do we have such bad infrastructure here? Can anyone give me a simple explanation?
Yes, absolutely. For the past 15 years this government has been singularly focused on growing the civil service. Infrastructure has been the absolute lowest priority as infrastructure spending does nothing for the MGEU.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2014, 9:04 PM
original original is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheswick View Post
Next time you should take a drive in Montreal.
What does that mean? I've never been to Montreal.
From Google Maps I see they at least have grade separation on most major roadways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2014, 9:09 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by original View Post
What does that mean? I've never been to Montreal.
From Google Maps I see they at least have grade separation on most major roadways.
Roads, bridges in Montreal are in rough shape there too. But to compare Winnipeg's infrastructure deficit with Montreal's is ludicrous. They at least have the roads of a real city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2014, 9:09 PM
leftimage leftimage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: MTL
Posts: 786
Quote:
Originally Posted by original View Post
What does that mean? I've never been to Montreal.
From Google Maps I see they at least have grade separation on most major roadways.
I think what he means is our roadways are shit. Although there's no debating the complexity of Montreal's road network, most people will agree it doesn't make for a pleasant drive when you consider the state of disrepair & the neverending road closures,detours, etc.

But tbh it has gotten much better in recent years, so If Winnie's roads are as bad you claim, they may very well be worse than Montreal's at this point.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2014, 9:12 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
Remember the tunnel portal that collapsed in Montreal a couple years ago. More of that could happen at any second. But they do have, well, tunnels and freeways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2014, 9:32 PM
steveosnyder steveosnyder is offline
North End Troublemaker
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: YWG
Posts: 1,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
Roads, bridges in Montreal are in rough shape there too. But to compare Winnipeg's infrastructure deficit with Montreal's is ludicrous. They at least have the roads of a real city.
Rawr -- "Real" roads...



https://www.flickr.com/photos/steve-brandon/3092346832/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2014, 9:32 PM
Only The Lonely..'s Avatar
Only The Lonely.. Only The Lonely.. is offline
Portage & Main 50 below
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheswick View Post
Next time you should take a drive in Montreal.
Montreal is definitely crumbling.

I was there in March, and can safely say that some of those freeway flyovers didn't inspire a lot of confidence when driving under them.
__________________
WINNIPEG: Home of Canada's first skyscraper!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 1:51 AM
Reignman Reignman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
I'm going to make an assumption they will be interchanges. Otherwise, what's the point really?
I would think a simple flyover for inbound city traffic via the bypasses should suffice..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 2:06 AM
The Jabroni's Avatar
The Jabroni The Jabroni is offline
Go kicky fast, okay!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Donut Dominion
Posts: 3,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Only The Lonely.. View Post
Montreal is definitely crumbling.

I was there in March, and can safely say that some of those freeway flyovers didn't inspire a lot of confidence when driving under them.
That bridge collapse from a few years ago, ain't comforting to think about either, and I'm heading over there next month... by car.
__________________
Back then, I used to be indecisive.

Now, I'm not so sure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 3:14 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
Yes, absolutely. For the past 15 years this government has been singularly focused on growing the civil service. Infrastructure has been the absolute lowest priority as infrastructure spending does nothing for the MGEU.
They've increased infrastructure spending by over 200% above what it was. They may have taken a while to start (8 years), but since then they've spent a lot of money on infrastructure, and have actually started addressing the issues. Sure, it's time for a change, but credit where credit is due.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 3:17 AM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
Pure pandering is what you are referring to. What has been built lately? The Centreport road to nowhere? What else?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 3:20 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
They've brought provincial highways back from the point of where they were almost undriveable. They now often have paved shoulders and smooth surfaces where before that wasn't the case. The big projects are taking more time than I'd like for sure, but the money has been flowing, increasing from just $150M in 2005 to near $600M now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 3:33 AM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
Repaving roads - what every other government does without announcement, without fanfare.

Pffft.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 3:45 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Every government does that with fanfare. It isn't just about replacement, it's about a mass investment to bring our roads up to par. Now that the ground work is done, it seems they're moving on to the bigger stuff. Better late than never I suppose.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 2:08 PM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Kildonan
Posts: 2,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by original View Post
What does that mean? I've never been to Montreal.
From Google Maps I see they at least have grade separation on most major roadways.
I thought you were more referring to the state of repair of the infrastructure as opposed to the type of it. Certainly Montreal has superior "types" of roads, but it also 3.8MM people living in a smaller area than the size of Winnipeg so it's density is greater than 5 times that of Winnipeg.

I was referring to the upkeep of the infrastructure there. The aforementioned bridge troubles. There have been several huge sink holes on ste catherines downtown, one swallowing a backhoe when they were starting to repair it. The city is finally going to properly repair the street now. I think 24 structures in the city was deemed to be in critical need of repair. Trust me, Montreal infrastruture if in worse condition than Winnipeg

And if you think Winnipeg projects get delayed. Take a look at this beauty. A ramp by the airport that has remained half finished for years. Literally a bridge to nowhere.
"Only in Quebec: Four-year project six years behind schedule"
http://montreal.ctvnews.ca/only-in-q...dule-1.1403091

My point is so many people complain about Winnipeg and it's infrastructure, as if it's a Winnipeg only issue, like Winnipeg is the only city with potholes. These issues happen all over the place and Winnipeg is not the worst of the lot. I think the biggest issue with Winnipeg is its far too spread out. Too much road per person to maintain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 2:24 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reignman View Post
I would think a simple flyover for inbound city traffic via the bypasses should suffice..
Can we include a couple of toll booths for that inbound city traffic? It would include a once a month exemption for any out of province plates.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 1:31 AM
yellowghost yellowghost is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
Can we include a couple of toll booths for that inbound city traffic? It would include a once a month exemption for any out of province plates.
Big supporter of toll freeways but only if the fares don't negate the savings of using it. Say..if it was a two dollar fare one way. If one lives in the suburbs but works on the opposite end of town, you should easily get the money back in the form of gas savings. But more importantly would be the savings in leisure time, which I consider priceless. Now if you live in transcona and work in saint boniface, you wouldnt save as much time or money.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 3:09 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
Yes, absolutely. For the past 15 years this government has been singularly focused on growing the civil service. Infrastructure has been the absolute lowest priority as infrastructure spending does nothing for the MGEU.
Ask anyone who works at the MB govt.'s crown corp.'s how many positions they've added to bloat the payrolls!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 3:53 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt18325 View Post
Every government does that with fanfare. It isn't just about replacement, it's about a mass investment to bring our roads up to par. Now that the ground work is done, it seems they're moving on to the bigger stuff. Better late than never I suppose.
SpeNDP have been in power since 1999 but it takes until 2014 until they finally realize a need to spend on infrastructure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:57 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.