HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2018, 4:30 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by eskimo33 View Post
Hooray, the development agreement is signed!
https://www.statesman.com/sports/201...in-mls-stadium
I'm assuming this means we'll have an announcement before the end of the year on the Columbus sale and the Austin team being official.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2018, 5:28 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,289
Interesting they are still entertaining the idea of starting the team in 2020 at a temporary location.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2018, 7:11 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
Interesting they are still entertaining the idea of starting the team in 2020 at a temporary location.
Realistically they'll have to play part of 2021 somewhere else anyway in all liklihood.

I'm hopeful we get kickin in 2020. Either play at UT or Round Rock and call it a day. I think it'll be nice to get a good fanbase built up and soft launch the team with lower expectations than a full new stadium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2018, 12:37 AM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,780
God, I hope PSV does something like this with the stadium's lighting!

https://www.mlssoccer.com/post/2018/...pril-13-opener
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2018, 1:19 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILUVSAT View Post
God, I hope PSV does something like this with the stadium's lighting!

https://www.mlssoccer.com/post/2018/...pril-13-opener
That is awesome!

I suspect our stadium will have similar capability in terms of state of the art electronics, but the overall effect will probably not be as dramatic. The translucent walls of Allianz allow the light to escape in all directions, which is probably less desired here due to our dark sky policies. I think our stadium will be focusing more on interior fan experience and less on impacts around the stadium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 6:39 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,289
Site Plan submitted to the city:



I didn't realize that strip on the southwest was railroad ROW. Bummer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 7:14 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,319
Do we have any information about a rail stop and/or a pedestrian crossing to get to Delta Drive? That would *really* open up connectivity especially to the breweries.

In a perfect world someone would have bought that print show at the end of McKalla place and we could extend McKalla Place under the red line and connect it to Delta Dr.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 7:41 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
Site Plan submitted to the city:



I didn't realize that strip on the southwest was railroad ROW. Bummer.
Are you finding this on the permit search or somewhere else? I can't seem to bring anything up for 10414 McKalla

Edit: Ah, it's in there as "MC KALLA"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 7:52 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoOgE View Post
Do we have any information about a rail stop and/or a pedestrian crossing to get to Delta Drive? That would *really* open up connectivity especially to the breweries.

In a perfect world someone would have bought that print show at the end of McKalla place and we could extend McKalla Place under the red line and connect it to Delta Dr.
Nope. There isn't any funding for the rail stop.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 8:47 PM
urbancore urbancore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Zilker
Posts: 1,554
you think that the city will get complaints from the tenants about the noise/traffic from the stadium? It could get quite intrusive for a someone who didn't necessarily "chose" to live next to a stadium.

As I understand it, Austin Housing Authority has a waiting list for subsidized housing, and tenants rarely get a choice. The one I lived next to on Bluebonnet -Goodrich Place, typically had elderly (ambulances were very common), and/or infirmed....one guy was disabled (and spent all day in front of the Shell station on Lamar bumming drinks off customers) Harmless sweet guy, but just saying, this may not be the best spot for subsidized housing.

If the entire building uses the % of per-capita income approach like they do with the "density bonus", that could work. Those projects rely on the tenants to chose to live there.

On the other hand, I think it would be good if they built more "family" style units. I think the kids could/would be inspired, and the teens would have a great place to work part time...come to think of it, I think that is a great idea.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 9:05 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,600
One of the ABJ reporters tweeted that the stadium lease allows the affordable housing to be built at an alternative site if Precourt opts to pursue it elsewhere.

I wouldn't bet on that Phase 2 happening at this point . . .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 9:09 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
One of the ABJ reporters tweeted that the stadium lease allows the affordable housing to be built at an alternative site if Precourt opts to pursue it elsewhere.

I wouldn't bet on that Phase 2 happening at this point . . .
With council approval.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 9:44 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
With council approval.
If PSV came up with an acceptable trade, I bet they'd do it. DCBrickley's right -- it's a crappy place to put subsidized housing -- or really any housing at all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 10:22 PM
urbancore urbancore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Zilker
Posts: 1,554
it looks like the buildings are approx 10' apart on one side. No way you don't have serious noise problem with tenants being that close. Imagine an announcer's voice, concerts, loud crowds...come on man. This is crazy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 11:14 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dcbrickley View Post
it looks like the buildings are approx 10' apart on one side. No way you don't have serious noise problem with tenants being that close. Imagine an announcer's voice, concerts, loud crowds...come on man. This is crazy.
1. I'd imagine the parking garage for that housing would be on the north side, nearest the stadium.

2. The design of the stadium and the overhanging shade structures are expected to help significantly with noise containment.


Come on, this is Austin, where ACL Fest is in open air and the noise literally carries for miles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2019, 11:21 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,289
Signature calling for votes on sports stadiums submitted to city clerk.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2019, 5:27 AM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
Signature calling for votes on sports stadiums submitted to city clerk.
I read about that....so what does that mean for the whole project? Is this a real threat? These people are truly such idiots.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2019, 6:33 AM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahealy View Post
I read about that....so what does that mean for the whole project? Is this a real threat? These people are truly such idiots.
I mean the lease is signed?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2019, 6:58 AM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoOgE View Post
I mean the lease is signed?
True AND council voted. They don't have much legal backing here....I also can't even really play devil's advocate because IndyAustin is suuuper shady. Sad!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2019, 2:35 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,600
ABJ coverage says:

Quote:
Austin's Major League Soccer stadium deal may be inked but it's still in the crosshairs of opponents.

A group called Friends of McKalla Place said Thursday it had gathered 29,000 signatures calling for voter approval of sports stadiums and entertainment facilities on city-owned land.

The neighborhood group, which calls itself an "informal, grassroots organization," said it submitted those signatures to the Austin City Clerk and wants an ordinance before voters in May.

The city has already entered a lease and development agreement with Precourt Sports Ventures for an MLS stadium at McKalla Place, a 24-acre North Austin tract just south of The Domain. But the deal remains a source of controversy for stadium opponents who are upset the land will be exempt from property taxes.

Craig Nazor, a supporter of Friends of McKalla Place and member of the environmentalist Sierra Club, said local governments should receive tax revenue from the development of McKalla Place.

"Most importantly, it denies the people their voice in how our public land is used," Nazor said of the stadium deal.

The stadium agreement signed in December does allow PSV to exit the deal if an initiative or referendum "adversely affects" its ability to run the stadium.

The membership of Friends of McKalla is murky. Nazor was the only person identified in the Thursday announcement, which quoted multiple unnamed "representatives." Political action committees IndyAustin and Fair Play Austin helped collect the signatures.

IndyAustin was also a vehement opponent of CodeNext and gathered enough petitions to put a question on November's ballot asking whether voter approval should be required for comprehensive land-use revisions. Proposition J was defeated at the polls by a 52-48 margin.
https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...a-deal-up.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.