HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


320 Granville in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Vancouver Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 12:21 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
Lol cray cray

Does anyone know what was there before the hideous parking garage ?
Well in 1959 it was a bunch of retail. Fur shop, newspapers, sandwiches, barbers, cleaners and a coffee shop...



http://searcharchives.vancouver.ca/g...ordova-sts;rad

Better shot of the corner with the train station in the background:



http://searcharchives.vancouver.ca/g...pr-station;rad

The parking garage was supposedly built in 1960.

EDIT: Confirmed.

Quote:
The owner of the site, at 320 Granville, is tearing down a 50-year-old parking garage that is becoming less profitable every year.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/repor...rticle4242547/

And if you look at the first photo you can still see the Almer Hotel (610 West Cordova). The photo of it isn't online but from the description:

Quote:
Photograph shows the Almer Hotel on West Cordova Street and the St. Francis Hotel to its left. Cars are parked on the street in front of the hotels.
http://searcharchives.vancouver.ca/s...lmer-hotel;rad
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2014, 12:46 AM
itinerant's Avatar
itinerant itinerant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 230
Tom Hawthorn's Blog has some interesting background on the businesses that used to be on that corner.

http://tomhawthorn.blogspot.ca/2012/...n-and-now.html


City of Vancouver Archives CVA 1184-3272
Wilson's Newspapers at the corner of Granville Street and Cordova
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2014, 5:55 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Heard thru a reliable source that the sale of this property was just completed. It doesn't sound like it'll be redeveloped soon though as the new owners will be upgrading the parking equipment at the cost of several hundreds of thousands, which leads me to believe they intend to at least recoup that investment before demoing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2014, 6:03 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Well it's going to council to be referred to a public hearing, who knows this one might only be a couple years away after all.

http://former.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/...cuments/p1.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2014, 7:01 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Thank you for the update.

Of all the publicly known office tower proposals out there (i.e., 753 Seymour, 601 West Hastings, 1090 West Pender, 320 Granville), I think this one will have the most meaningful immediate impact on the urban fabric.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2014, 7:08 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
I'm looking forward to this one a lot as well. That's one corner that certainly needs improvement.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2014, 7:18 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Yes. Of the four sites, 320 Granville needs improvement the most. Furthermore, it is the site which will be improved the most by its proposed redevelopment, if they get the public realm component right.

EDIT: For the sake of the Queen Elizabeth viewcone, staff is recommending a 7.2 metre reduction in height. I wonder whether such a reduction will have a deleterious effect on the urbanity of the building's public realm component, unless it makes sense the developer will simply eliminate two income-generating office floors and nothing else.

Last edited by Prometheus; Jun 20, 2014 at 9:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2014, 9:53 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,864
OMG, can't they ease up on those freaking viewcones, just a bit (by 20m or so)? They're snarling up up just about everything ...
we could all go on about this, but something's gotta give. This is too much.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2014, 11:09 PM
Infrequent Poster Infrequent Poster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
OMG, can't they ease up on those freaking viewcones, just a bit (by 20m or so)? They're snarling up up just about everything ...
we could all go on about this, but something's gotta give. This is too much.
I wonder if they were to backfill the spot in the park where the sacred viewcone originates from could this be the answer to taller buildings? Say they raised the elevation by ....2-5 metres, over that distance I wonder if you could add another 10 to 20 metres on to a buildings height downtown. I'm only half serious here but, if this was a possible solution I could begin bringing loads of fill in my truck tommorow, no charge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2014, 11:46 PM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infrequent Poster View Post
I wonder if they were to backfill the spot in the park where the sacred viewcone originates from could this be the answer to taller buildings? Say they raised the elevation by ....2-5 metres, over that distance I wonder if you could add another 10 to 20 metres on to a buildings height downtown. I'm only half serious here but, if this was a possible solution I could begin bringing loads of fill in my truck tommorow, no charge.
Maybe if you plant some trees they'll block out a viewcone or two in a few decades
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2014, 12:18 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infrequent Poster View Post
I wonder if they were to backfill the spot in the park where the sacred viewcone originates from could this be the answer to taller buildings? Say they raised the elevation by ....2-5 metres, over that distance I wonder if you could add another 10 to 20 metres on to a buildings height downtown. I'm only half serious here but, if this was a possible solution I could begin bringing loads of fill in my truck tommorow, no charge.
Not possible, because for every metre you hope to gain on a downtown building, you have to backfill much more than that to see the same amount of mountain.




Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 6:34 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
This went to council last nigh here are the details

Summary and Recommendation
http://former.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/...ea2summary.pdf

Staff presentation
http://former.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/...esentation.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 6:54 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,864
Seems like an ok enough project; but they are sure slaves to that tabletop skyline effect that will further be emphasized.
(Who knows? Years down the road, the "tabletop" might be considered aesthetically unique in North America)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 7:09 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
Seems like an ok enough project; but they are sure slaves to that tabletop skyline effect that will further be emphasized.
(Who knows? Years down the road, the "tabletop" might be considered aesthetically unique in North America)
Tabletop skyline? What? This building soars 1.12 meters above the view cone.

We will no longer be able to see the north shore mountains ever again
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 7:19 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
This is the one spot where I'm ok with a stubby building since it would be nice for tourists to not be walking in darkness. But of course it's probably still tall enough to block the sunlight across to Waterfront station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 7:30 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,893
Well, as a company that's a pretty awesome location for people to be commuting to.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2014, 8:26 PM
PROSTSHOCKER's Avatar
PROSTSHOCKER PROSTSHOCKER is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 186
I wish the corners were rounded. Because of the columns of the waterfront station across and the ornate design of the Sinclair centre adjacent to it as well as the presense of modern, minimalistic buildings. This building could have tethered the general aesthetic of the area together with a softer exterior with those lines being more rounded and curved. Also, you know, the ocean. Waves etc

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2014, 9:01 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,212
Cool "rendering"!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2014, 10:26 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post
Tabletop skyline? What? This building soars 1.12 meters above the view cone.

We will no longer be able to see the north shore mountains ever again
hehe; now, now .....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2015, 3:24 AM
aSeattleite93 aSeattleite93 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Everett, WA, USA
Posts: 6
I had to find a link to Skyscraperpage on this building on Google images because I've just learned about it. It looks great, not sure why people are calling this buildings bland. And this viewcone thing.....unheard of in America lol (maybe)
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:09 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.