HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


View Poll Results: Which Chicago casino proposal is your favorite?
Ballys at Tribune 30 19.61%
Ballys at McCormick 8 5.23%
Hard Rock at One Central 12 7.84%
Rivers at The 78 82 53.59%
Rivers at McCormick 21 13.73%
Voters: 153. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1721  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2024, 12:46 PM
dreamy-developer's Avatar
dreamy-developer dreamy-developer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 38
A Demolition Notice has been made with a public meeting set for this Friday on June 14th for the official demo of the Chicago Tribune Freedom Center.

Estimated to take about 5 months to complete.

https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/...on_English.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1722  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2024, 1:28 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,411
While the temporary casino continues to slowly grow, it's still way under performing and even Johnson has doubts now. Get ready for a vacant lot on the former Tribune site..... Unless something changes soon.

https://chicago.suntimes.com/city-ha...rs-stadium-cta

By the numbers:

https://www.chicagobusiness.com/gamb...evenue-numbers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1723  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2024, 2:41 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,524
5 whole months to clear that site? I guess the machinery inside might have some resale value but the building itself is a just a steel shed with a brick veneer. The new city regulations probably mean they have to take it down one stick at a time though.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1724  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2024, 4:35 PM
gandalf612 gandalf612 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Andersonville, Chicago
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
5 whole months to clear that site? I guess the machinery inside might have some resale value but the building itself is a just a steel shed with a brick veneer. The new city regulations probably mean they have to take it down one stick at a time though.
Good! It's on the river which is recovering beautifully. They shouldn't be allowed to put that at risk with a rushed botched demo job.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1725  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2024, 7:37 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 998
the temporary casino at Medina Temple will become the only permanent casino in the city. RW is not going to happen. the market is just too saturated at this point and with sports books coming to the various stadiums and online options there is just not enough market demand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1726  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2024, 7:52 PM
ithakas's Avatar
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 992
Quote:
Originally Posted by west-town-brad View Post
the temporary casino at Medina Temple will become the only permanent casino in the city. RW is not going to happen. the market is just too saturated at this point and with sports books coming to the various stadiums and online options there is just not enough market demand.
I think this is a fine outcome, to be honest. Hopefully they can invest in making Medinah feel more permanent – no folding tables at entryways, dining areas that don't feel like mall food courts, etc. I wish there was a more design-savvy operator who was capable of creating a Monte-Carlo kind of vibe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1727  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2024, 8:28 PM
Handro Handro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,271
Honestly I was hoping Medina would become the permanent casino. Great location, small footprint, and potential to be a really cool urban casino that a wider swath of visitors might be interested to visit. Make it nicer, add some hospitality spaces (both upscale and down) and it could become an actual attraction for tourists and business travelers. A giant Bally's complex has a much narrower draw, IMO. We have enough lame river casinos in Chicagoland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1728  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2024, 5:06 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 998
^

another positive of the medina temple location is that all of that now-undesired-vacant Bloomingdales retail space is absorbed by the casino operation

since the whole block is a collection of historic buildings, this location could grow over time into an interesting historic urban casino as others have mentioned above
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1729  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2024, 2:21 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,524
The problem with Medinah is that there's no obvious room for expansion. It's a historic landmarked building and all the surrounding blocks are fully built-out with successful restaurants, parking garages, hotels and condos.

The other problem is that Medinah isn't exactly printing money. The revenue is getting better but it's still way short of projections, so I doubt Bally's even wants to expand in that location where they can't have on-site parking, hotel, dining or entertainment.

The landmark building is actually kind of a drag for them, I think Landmarks review will not let them do more elaborate interior design that would compete with the original architecture. I've heard anecdotally from a lot of people that it just feels crappy and barebones right now. Which is kind of a shame, I think a Steve Wynn style interior would be a great fit there...
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1730  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2024, 3:43 PM
iguy iguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 48
Curious if any of the other finalists would consider bidding again if it were opened back up; the lackluster performance of Medinah thus far might dissuade that, but perhaps the pitch could be made that a smaller River North location is not representative of the profitability of a project at the scale of what has been envisioned for River West?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1731  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2024, 4:09 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,283
The temp casino buildout feels cheap and low rent. Walked through it last time in town and I would not want to spend any time there. Feels like a perfect storm of not wanting to spend too much on it because its temp but coming up way short of the pro forma could scuttle the prospects of the larger facility.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1732  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2024, 11:52 AM
JK47 JK47 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 368
https://www.marketscreener.com/quote...Proj-47371020/

Looks like the project is back on. Financing, including $940 in construction financing and additional funding totally $2.07 billion, has been secured and a revised single phase proposal has been submitted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1733  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2024, 12:41 PM
glowrock's Avatar
glowrock glowrock is offline
Becoming Chicago-fied!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago (West Avondale)
Posts: 19,696
Quote:
Originally Posted by JK47 View Post
https://www.marketscreener.com/quote...Proj-47371020/

Looks like the project is back on. Financing, including $940 in construction financing and additional funding totally $2.07 billion, has been secured and a revised single phase proposal has been submitted.
This is great news. Didn't see this one happening at all given the litany of bad news concerning this project as of late!
__________________
"Deeply corrupt but still semi-functional - it's the Chicago way." -- Barrelfish
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1734  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2024, 2:04 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,475
The new architect is HKS, it's certainly an upgrade from the old design


https://www.chicagotribune.com/2024/...-hotel-design/

Edit: Bally's website has several more renderings, this is a much wider tower than the first rendering would make you believe




https://casinos.ballys.com/chicago/renderings.htm

Last edited by Randomguy34; Jul 12, 2024 at 8:27 PM. Reason: fixing image links
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1735  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2024, 2:19 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,524
Hmm, not bad. It still looks like pretty safe convention center architecture but it's better than the weird Snohetta-lite thing they were proposing before, and it doesn't have that weird 2-story hotel turd on the top. There's a lot of glass, which always helps.

I can't really tell from the renderings but it looks like they have moved the porte-cochere. That suburban-style dropoff plaza was the worst thing about the earlier designs, especially right on Chicago Ave. I'm not sure if it's pushed further south (close to the hotel) or if they tucked it under the building, which would be the ideal.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1736  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2024, 2:41 PM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is online now
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 830
The hotel will have better views of the city in that location. I liked the plaza tucked in between the buildings better, but maybe having it right next to the feeder ramp will mean they're more likely to fully utilize the space underneath it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1737  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2024, 3:38 PM
lakeshoredrive lakeshoredrive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 415
Looks like it’s around 400 ft tall?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1738  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2024, 5:09 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,451
It seems the tower may be a bit shorter than the original, but overall from the zoomed-out renders it looks x5 better!

Completely unexpected and exciting development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1739  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2024, 5:25 PM
iguy iguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 48
Hats off to whoever made this happen. Firstly in that we're still getting this at all, and secondly in that they actually improved the design.

Perhaps this helps provide some insurance for the other residential towers that have been planned in the northern part of West Loop/River West? Hopefully shores up the momentum for the greater area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1740  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2024, 5:33 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,492
Thank God they got rid of the "Welcome to our casino. For some stupid-ass reason, we decided to build a Motel 6 on the roof of it".

Bullet dodged.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:01 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.