HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #17261  
Old Posted May 1, 2023, 11:36 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
Population shifts can happen remarkably fast. Anyone who would have said in 2018 that within 5 years terminally static Atlantic Canada would become the fastest growing part of the country would have been committed.
I think that's really what the point was in the first place, it's certainly exactly what I was saying. You're picking a moment in time and saying that BC is done for and it's too late to turn the ship around, but just a couple years ago the exact opposite was true.

Picking one year and making bold claims off the current trends just doesn't work.

Who know what is happening in three years, maybe Calgary is more expensive than Vancouver, maybe westcoast kelp is found to be the superfuel of the future and everyone can't stop moving to Vancouver, maybe it gets so expensive in Vancouver that everyone leaves and goes back to London Ontario...
     
     
  #17262  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 1:56 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton_LRT
What I speak of is the 2015 proposal for surface LRT that the city cancelled. If instead, they simply did express buses with no upgrades, or even minimal upgrades it could have been run in a way for the council to show that it was not needed, or for the ridership to tell council it is needed. So, instead of the LRT phased system, a full express bus/BRT "light" BLAST network could have been implemented. Instead, nothing was done.
The city didn't cancel it. The Ontario government did.

Presuming senior governments don't do that again, the city will have both an LRT line and an express system with a rationalized network of local routes to feed them both.
     
     
  #17263  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 3:14 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
The city didn't cancel it. The Ontario government did.

Presuming senior governments don't do that again, the city will have both an LRT line and an express system with a rationalized network of local routes to feed them both.
My mistake. For some reason I thought the city was against it.
Still stand on the idea that even with it cancelled, the city should have tried to bring in express buses to show the need.
     
     
  #17264  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 4:18 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
My mistake. For some reason I thought the city was against it.
Still stand on the idea that even with it cancelled, the city should have tried to bring in express buses to show the need.
There were some councillors who were against. And a former mayor, though the cancellation happened after his term was done. There are still residents opposed and the occasional cry from their ilk to cancel it, but the dissenting voices seem to have a lower volume now. Many people are wondering what's going on though as it's been taking a while to relaunch procurement -- supposedly there will be an update presented to city council soon, with many changes to the original plans.

I wish they had introduced express services on more of the routes too. Years ago. The LRT was cancelled in December 2019, and then we all know what happened 3 months later and the effect it had on transit demand; perhaps service changes were being discussed until the world stopped, who knows. I doubt it though, Hamilton city council doesn't move that fast.
     
     
  #17265  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 5:12 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
I think that's really what the point was in the first place, it's certainly exactly what I was saying. You're picking a moment in time and saying that BC is done for and it's too late to turn the ship around, but just a couple years ago the exact opposite was true.

Picking one year and making bold claims off the current trends just doesn't work.
When I stated that "it maybe too late to turn the ship around", I should have been more specific. I was talking about BC, Vancouver in particular, being able to bring back some sanity to it's horrific cost of housing.

BC has a lot to offer and great economic potential but that will, as with all places, be dependent upon getting qualified workers and affordable land to help a business expand. Many young Canadians would love to come to BC but financially it simply isn't an option and conversely many young BCers would like to stay but know that fare greener pastures lie over the Rockies.

This is not some "anti-BC" thing but simply reality but you don't have to take my word for it, just go ask California.
     
     
  #17266  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 5:23 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,878
On a more positive note, I see Victoria has gotten some money to build a BRT to it's eastern suburbs. I'm curious if this is just express buses or a bus-only lane BRT. Anyone have any info?
     
     
  #17267  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 5:48 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
On a more positive note, I see Victoria has gotten some money to build a BRT to it's eastern suburbs. I'm curious if this is just express buses or a bus-only lane BRT. Anyone have any info
They're calling it Blink RapidBus but it's just an rebranding of one of their regular routes with a few stops removed and higher frequencies, 7-8min peak, 15min off peak. It has a paint separated bus-only lane for part of the route, how much of the route I don't know.

They're planning for rebranding the routes to UVIC and Swartz Bay next.
     
     
  #17268  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 11:01 AM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilgore Trout View Post
Yeah that's basically it. Plenty of capital expenditure but no political will to address the systemic inability of transit agencies to provide adequate service.

In 2013, Montreal and Toronto both had better transit frequencies than in 2013. That's wild.
This isn't that damning an argument. Have transit ridership levels returned to 100% of pre-pandemic levels? Even if they have, how long has it been? There is an ebb and flow to this stuff. For a long time during and after the pandemic transit vehicles ran mostly empty at considerable cost and people were OK with that.

BTW the REM de l'Est is going to get built by this government and I believe it's now likely it will be over a longer distance.

And of course there is the huge tramway project in Québec City.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #17269  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 12:53 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilgore Trout View Post
The CAQ is a nationalist party, not a party driven by any sort of coherent ideology,.
Not entirely untrue, but it's still ridiculous how people label them with all sorts of American or Prairie Conservative tropes, just because they don't like them.

I love how it often goes:

"Oh, Quebec's right-wing CAQ government will absolutely hate this!"

"Actually, they're totally in favour of this and are moving in that direction already."

""
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #17270  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 4:15 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
They're calling it Blink RapidBus but it's just an rebranding of one of their regular routes with a few stops removed and higher frequencies, 7-8min peak, 15min off peak. It has a paint separated bus-only lane for part of the route, how much of the route I don't know.

They're planning for rebranding the routes to UVIC and Swartz Bay next.
It sounds like they are setting themselves up to be able to go to the various levels of government to show the need for LRT or better. The question is whether funds can be allocated outside of the GVA for doing that in the future.
     
     
  #17271  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 5:49 PM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
They're calling it Blink RapidBus but it's just an rebranding of one of their regular routes with a few stops removed and higher frequencies, 7-8min peak, 15min off peak. It has a paint separated bus-only lane for part of the route, how much of the route I don't know.

They're planning for rebranding the routes to UVIC and Swartz Bay next.
Well that's disappointing. Seems like this is nothing more than a political announcement than anything else. It's a shame because Victoria has high levels of transit ridership and the road system is horrific with no freeways even in the suburbs.
     
     
  #17272  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 9:55 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
Well that's disappointing. Seems like this is nothing more than a political announcement than anything else. It's a shame because Victoria has high levels of transit ridership and the road system is horrific with no freeways even in the suburbs.
It kind of does have a freeway. TCH 1 is freeway from Tillicum Rd to the Malahat.
     
     
  #17273  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 11:29 PM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 2,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
It kind of does have a freeway. TCH 1 is freeway from Tillicum Rd to the Malahat.
Yes, and 17 north of Gateway Village - close to where 1 becomes a freeway - is a divided highway with no intersections for six kilometres.
     
     
  #17274  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 11:34 PM
Kilgore Trout's Avatar
Kilgore Trout Kilgore Trout is offline
菠蘿油
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: hong kong / montreal
Posts: 6,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
This isn't that damning an argument. Have transit ridership levels returned to 100% of pre-pandemic levels? Even if they have, how long has it been? There is an ebb and flow to this stuff. For a long time during and after the pandemic transit vehicles ran mostly empty at considerable cost and people were OK with that.
Ridership will never recover if service is constantly being cut. There won't be some magic moment when people suddenly decide to take the bus again after shunning it because a route that used to come every 10 minutes now comes every 30, and fares went up just to really rub some salt in the would. There's a reason transit advocates are warning of a death spiral.

You just need to look south of the border to see where we're headed. There are lots of shiny new transit lines in the US, but hardly anyone uses them because service is so awful. And the legacy transit is crumbling into dust.
__________________
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
     
     
  #17275  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 11:58 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,108
That's so weird. The service is pretty much back to pre-pandemic levels here. There are a few routes that were discontinued a couple months ago, but under performing routes tend to be cut from time to time anyway. One was a route I took but I don't think I ever saw it with more than 2/3 seats full while most routes are tight standing room only in rush hour. It was a route that fully overlapped with at least one other service its whole length so meh.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
     
     
  #17276  
Old Posted May 3, 2023, 12:19 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvisforme View Post
Yes, and 17 north of Gateway Village - close to where 1 becomes a freeway - is a divided highway with no intersections for six kilometres.
Victoria is interesting, it is a mini metro with a mini little freeway "system."

The #1 out to Langford now is nearly sufficient for the corridor it serves, just the final intersection at West Shore Parkway needs to be upgraded to an interchange to call it "complete" for me.

The 17 is a classic "BC special" of free flow sections with interchanges mixed with nearly freeway scale sections that just need intersections upgraded to interchanges and a couple small sections of crappy highway with houses having direct driveway access to the road.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #17277  
Old Posted May 3, 2023, 2:15 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,628
I'm not holding my breath on timing, but when Kelowna eventually gets serious about putting an LRT line down Harvey Drive/Highway 97 and simply duplicating and replacing the existing BRT-light service currently in place, that will be a very successful system. Especially with UBC Okanagan as a major trip generator at its eastern terminus and four urban growth nodes, including downtown, in the centre. The downsides of building your whole city around one road are manifest, but the upside is that you've built your whole city around your LRT line should you build it.

Crossing Lake Okanagan and climbing the steep hill into West Kelowna are the obvious conundrums for an LRT line. I don't have a great answer for the latter, other than trusting that a suitable alignment is feasible, possibly with a bored tunnel section up the hill to ease the grade (not dissimilar to the SkyTrain Evergreen Line extension in Metro Vancouver). But for the former, there would be a ton of local support for a second crossing, assuming that the new bridge would include LRT, road lanes, and multi-use trail elements.

The new bridge would not necessarily need to have all that many vehicle lanes, I would suggest only two with space for an emergency shoulder lane. This would allow the existing bridge and the new bridge to function as one-way couplets. The new bridge would provide two westbound lanes, the existing bridge would continue providing two east-bound lanes, and the remaining three narrow lanes would be reconfigured to be two reversible rush-hour lanes to address the daily diurnal congestion that is endemic in the city and out of recognition that it is still a provincial highway carrying non-local traffic through the city.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
     
     
  #17278  
Old Posted May 3, 2023, 2:15 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,951
What a waste of time and resources for the most part. Put in fare gates and call it a day.

---
Transit peace officers have given out many more tickets and warnings for fare evasion in the first few months of 2023 compared to the previous four years, especially on the LRT system. Between January and March of this year, officers handed out 157 tickets and 2,798 warnings, compared to 17 and 92 during the same period in 2019. Steve Bradshaw, president of Amalgamated Transit Union Local 569, told CBC the drastic increase is part of a deliberate effort by the city to address safety and social disorder. Nearly 60% of tickets went to people who are homeless or who provided no fixed address. Coun. Ashley Salvador said fining homeless people for fare evasion is “absolutely concerning” and intends to question administration about the issue in mid-May. Erick Ambtman, executive director of EndPovertyEdmonton and chair of the Edmonton Police Commission, said people who don’t appear in court to pay a ticket can be subject to a warrant, which can lead to an arrest the next time they interact with police. “It ties up that officer’s time. It ties up the justice system’s time,” said Ambtman.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/...D%5D&mc_cid=0096601f46&mc_eid=b81cde227f
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #17279  
Old Posted May 3, 2023, 3:00 PM
Luisito's Avatar
Luisito Luisito is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post

BTW the REM de l'Est is going to get built by this government and I believe it's now likely it will be over a longer distance.

And of course there is the huge tramway project in Québec City.
This is good news for Montreal. I hope the new route still provides transit coverage for the people In MTL north.

After the REM is done it would be great to see Montreal improve its its commuter rail.
     
     
  #17280  
Old Posted May 3, 2023, 3:33 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is online now
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,905
What Montreal REALLY needs to do now is to maintain and dramatically improve its current transit service. Especially the buses. I used to hop on the 80, a bus that used to reliably show up every 4-6 minutes. I have stopped taking the bus altogether a few years ago when I ended up waiting 10-15 minutes on a regular basis. Sometimes the bus wouldnt show up at all. I recall waiting for up to 20-30 minutes in the early mornings of deep cold February and freezing my ass off for that bus. I used to get to work late regularly and getting shit for it because my bus just didnt show up.

Its unacceptable. They need to fix this first.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.