HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1701  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2026, 9:05 PM
build_tall_chicago build_tall_chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Chicago
Posts: 17
Is it considered on topic to complain about the $425M TIF money omitting the red line stop and instead adding a 1200 space parking complex funded through the TIF which apparently will just hold money to pay for it's own maintenance and considering that, not make city any money overall? Also the whole Riverline development here just on the north as well AND the Metra yards across the river bought by Ishbia, is there plans to connect this swath of land to public transportation? The Ishbia part is across the river and is far far out so maybe not considering that
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1702  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2026, 1:38 AM
Bonsai Tree's Avatar
Bonsai Tree Bonsai Tree is offline
Small but Mighty
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
?? I can't tell if you're joking or not..
I am most certainly not joking. That is not a taxpayer expense. Related should be paying for that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1703  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2026, 12:45 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by build_tall_chicago View Post
Is it considered on topic to complain about the $425M TIF money omitting the red line stop and instead adding a 1200 space parking complex funded through the TIF which apparently will just hold money to pay for it's own maintenance and considering that, not make city any money overall? Also the whole Riverline development here just on the north as well AND the Metra yards across the river bought by Ishbia, is there plans to connect this swath of land to public transportation? The Ishbia part is across the river and is far far out so maybe not considering that
I think he's still going to try to get a new park on to the 78 first and the Amtrak yard is the backup. The Fire needs to get their field built first and the Bears saga needs to end probably before they seriously engage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1704  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2026, 11:11 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonsai Tree View Post
I am most certainly not joking. That is not a taxpayer expense. Related should be paying for that.
It’s not even the “taxpayer money” thing that bothers me per se. The original 78 plan to generate TIF revenues on site is fine, and was essentially a backdoor property tax break.

Instead, the city is just blatantly taking money from West Loop’s TIF and spending it here. That will make it harder to finance some *actually important* projects that benefit the entire city and region, like the long-term Union Station rehab and the bus terminal. Insanely misplaced priorities.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:43 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.