Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123
I don't mean to be disrespectful but I think this is basically backwards even though it matches conventional wisdom. People think that because it's a small city it should reach for a modest toolkit (no tunnels, no new rail, etc.), but that implicitly it makes sense to wildly overbuild and overinvest in transit in very low density areas. I believe that commuter rail in Fall River is more of a stretch than an underground streetcar in the inner city. A nice modern streetcar service downtown would likely recover a lot more cost than 15 minute bus service in a lot of the suburban areas.
Eventually the city will need some kind of answer for transportation in high density inner city areas. I don't think people generally appreciate the densities that are being zoned for and hit. It is a bit like Toronto, but at a smaller scale and minus the existing transit infrastructure. In 2021, part of downtown hit intra-muros Paris density levels. These higher density areas do not have enough extent for a big system but they likely will in the coming years and the municipality is deliberately concentrating a lot of development.
|
The problem is that too many times to suggest to build it bigger than it needs
right now, is to waste money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doady
So many buses bunched together on a peninsula, and on bridges crossing the bay too, I think it will need a rail solution sooner rather than later, kinda like Muni Metro and BART.
London is another city that should invest in rail transit soon, being in the snow belt, and inability of articulated buses to operate in heavy snow, which Ottawa learned the hard way.
|
It has needed one for decades, but because it is small, it is ignored.
What is the population of the smallest city with rail transit?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00
A town of 2.5k needs vans. Not trains. We saw the same in Ottawa with the MOOSE clowns arguing that instead of a high frequency metro (Trillium Line) serving hundreds of thousands who live and work along that corridor, the priority should be regional rail service to places like Arnprior, which generates maybe a few hundred commuters to Ottawa per day and a fraction of that to the core. If you insist on living 50 km from work that's your problem. Not the transit service's.
|
Distance should not matter to the transit agencies. If we had good intercity transportation services, and good inner city transit, the distance would not matter. We have bad of both across Canada.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00
Suggesting EXO or GO type service for Halifax is pretty laughable. You could fit the entire population of some of these Halifax exurbs in a single GO Train.
And if you have to use smaller trains like Ottawa on Trillium, you need to temporally separate freight and passenger rail. And even those trains are probably overkill for Halifax exurban.
Focus on transit for the core. It'll free up roadsoace for the exurban residents. They are cool with spending hours in their cars. They know what they signed up for.
|
You can run a GO train, but shorter. There is no need for the 12 bilevel cars per train, but maybe 4 cars is more what will work.