HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Projects & Construction Updates


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1621  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2009, 1:20 AM
ldoto's Avatar
ldoto ldoto is online now
Londoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London,Ont
Posts: 1,341
Rebirth of Pioneer Village a useful blueprint

Update!!!

There was a time – and not too long ago – Sheila Johnson questioned whether the Fanshawe Pioneer Village would survive long enough to reach this spring’s 50th anniversary season.

The village, however, has not only survived, but Mrs. Johnson, the village’s executive director, says the ongoing turnaround could well serve as a blueprint for other financially struggling institutions.

“I clearly remember the words of Controller (Gord) Hume who said we were a hair’s breadth away from closing. In 2005 it was do or die and we knew it. Controller Hume has been a champion for us and at that time that was a pretty accurate statement,” Mrs. Johnson says.

“It took three years to implement our new master plan, but it has made a huge difference. Today we are all very upbeat, very positive. We are looking forward to the 50th season with excitement.”

Mrs. Johnson says there were two major components to the village’s turnaround – a revitalizing of the village’s infrastructure and then a renewed commitment to customer service.

Revitalizing the village’s many buildings, Mrs. Johnson says, was seen as an immediate necessity.

“The site was in bad shape,” she admits. “For more than a decade there was no money for maintenance, the site was not well maintained. It was visibly derelict throughout. It was missing a proper visitors entrance and a visitors’ centre where we could keep heritage elements properly and do year-round programming. That’s what the capital campaign has been about.

“We’re doing really well. It’s a $3 million capital campaign and we have raised (as of the most recent update) $2,076,220. And that’s all private sources, individuals, businesses, corporations, associations. We wanted to see the community demonstrate they’re interested in our survival before we asked for public money. And they have certainly shown that support.”

The village immediately began work on revitalizing the site’s 30 buildings, investing $1 million on everything from new paint to chimney repairs and the construction of ramps and proper steps.

“The site has gone from derelict, visibly rundown, to now very well maintained,” Mrs. Johnson says. “In three years we have definitely exceeded our targets. There is still work to do in the village. I would say we’re about 60 per cent completed, probably with another two years to go. We can’t do it all at once, shut down the whole village. So we have been working on two-to-three projects a year.”

The largest remaining capital project – and there are no plans for any new buildings inside the village – is the construction of a proper visitors’ centre where the staff could not only store artefacts, but also to have space large enough to create year-round programming. While the funding has not yet been secured to build the centre, Mrs. Johnson says it will get built.

Continued After Advertisement Below

Advertisement

“The Spriet Centre (so named after a $300,000 contribution by the Spriet family) would cost about $1.3 million,” Mrs. Johnson says. “It would be 8,000 sq. ft. and have three functions; artefact storage (there are about 24,000 items stored in basements and storage closets through the village), it would replace the portables we have been using as offices since 1991, and it would include about 2,000 sq. ft. of public space for exhibitions, to run education programs and to be available for community rental. We would become a year-round facility.”

The second component of the turnaround was to put the focus back on the village’s customers.

“We had to move to a more customer focused program. We had to create new revenue sources, make a new marketing plan, refocus on re-branding the village, focus on history and on fun,” Mrs. Johnson says. “We did customer surveys day-to-day. They showed our customers were multi-generational family groups. The typical group of visitors was a family and another adult. And our surveys said 55 per cent of those visitors came from London and Middlesex County. Forty-five per cent of visitors came from outside that area, from other parts of Ontario, other regions of Canada and even outside the country.”

While the surveys established where the village’s customers were coming from, it also established what they were looking for.

“Five solid years of survey analysis showed us this is what people like, this is what they don’t like. We were learning their needs, what were their higher-level wants. They wanted an enjoyable experience, but it had to have a high quality educational component,” Mrs. Johnson says. “We’re really good at that. If you think back to Grade 10 history, you could have had a history teacher who was dry and boring and just read things out of books or you could have had a teacher who made history relevant, who illustrated it, demonstrated. We believe the best way to teach history is for people to experience it. So we focused on a more interactive experience. There right inside talking to the printers who are making cards, the people who are doing their day-to-day work. They are seeing re-enactments. That animation of the past is what we are all about.”

Those two things are the basis of a turnaround Mrs. Johnson says has put the village into a strong financial position with a bright future ahead of it.

“We are in a very stable position. We asked our customers what they wanted and they told us they want the village run in a responsible, business-like manner. So we run it like a business, very efficient, very effective. We’re very trim, count every dime, check on every minute,” Mrs. Johnson says. “We are going to continue to refine our programs. We need to keep our programs high quality, but keep updating them and developing new ones. People want new and fresh and that’s what we focus on delivering.”

That focus could, Mrs. Johnson says, serve to help other organizations now dealing with their own troubling financial situations.

“We have actually done presentations on the lessons we’ve learned through this process. What we tell people is you have to have a solid business plan. It has to be developed with the entire organization involved. From the board to senior managers, staff, everyone has to be onboard. And you have to think long term. Our plan is 10 years,” Mrs. Johnson says. “You have to run your museum, your charity organization, whatever it is, you have to run it in an efficient, business-like manner. The same rules and practices apply. And whatever you do, it has to be customer focused.”

The customer focus is what Mrs. Johnson says made all the difference in the village’s survival and would do so for any other organization facing a crisis.

“You are not going to be anywhere without your customers. You have to know what their needs are. Your programs have to be relevant and you have to create programs your customers want,” Mrs. Johnson says. “You have to stick with your plan too. It doesn’t help to be counter to whatever your plan is. It might be a short-term plan to get you somewhere, but you have to be true to it. True to what your customers want.”

And in the case of the pioneer village, Mrs. Johnson says that plan helped save what has proven to be a well-loved community institution.

“Even in our darkest hour, I knew this place was worth saving. This is a gem in London. It’s an enjoyable experience for sure, it’s important to this community, but also to southwestern Ontario,” Mrs. Johnson says. “I think there was a universal belief in this organization. Our success comes directly as a result of the City of London stepping up with operating dollars, but we had no part in that. It was when they community saw what was happening. How dire things were, that’s when they stepped up. I would call it a roar of support and council recognized that. This year we are celebrating our 50th season and we couldn’t have done that without the community support we have received.”



WANT MORE INFO?


¦ Fanshawe Pioneer Village, 1424 Clarke Rd., inside Fanshawe Conservation Area, opens for its 50th season May 16.

¦ For more information about the village, phone 519-457-1296, email [email protected] or online www.fanshawepioneervillage.ca.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1622  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2009, 7:59 PM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,141
I feel bad for the employees there. One friend of mine works at the London store. My neighbour used to work there as well.

I never liked the store itself though. They wouldn't let you in if you weren't a "member". I think it's a dumb business model and notwithstanding the employees out of work, I'm glad to see it gone. It would be nice to actually see what the store is all about without being harassed about needing a membership card to get in. I'm sure the attitude there has hurt Costco too, because after my experience with Sam's Club I never even bothered trying Costco thinking it was all the same. Sam's Club was pretty unwelcoming, and I'm sure that hurt their sales.

I hope Lowe's moves in there. I'm against big-box retailing, but now that the building is there it should be put to good use.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1623  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2009, 2:01 AM
GreatTallNorth2 GreatTallNorth2 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by manny_santos View Post
They wouldn't let you in if you weren't a "member". I think it's a dumb business model and notwithstanding the employees out of work, I'm glad to see it gone. It would be nice to actually see what the store is all about without being harassed about needing a membership card to get in. I'm sure the attitude there has hurt Costco too, because after my experience with Sam's Club I never even bothered trying Costco thinking it was all the same.
The problem was nothing to do with the business model. Costco does very well.

Sam's Club failed in London because they built on the outskirts of the city and did not anticipate Costco opening a second location in London. Costco's location was much better in a more developed part of the city. Also, Sam's Club failed because it is not much different than Costco, except with with Walmarts tacky uniforms. London is simply not big enough to support 3 club stores.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1624  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2009, 3:37 AM
ldoto's Avatar
ldoto ldoto is online now
Londoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London,Ont
Posts: 1,341
London Transit faces hard choices

Mon, March 2, 2009

Can't meet rising demand for its services


London Transit has raised fares and is getting more money from city hall but still can’t meet rising demand for service, the transit boss says.

Even after an 8 % fare hike and a 5.6 % rise in the city’s transit allocation, the transit service doesn’t have the resources to keep up, says general manager Larry Ducharme.

The extra money from fares and the city means 6,000 more hours of service this year, Ducharme told the transit commission’s board last week. “But we could easily add 20,000 hours of service.”

LTC authorities were breathing easier after city council approved a 2009 property tax increase of 2.6 % last week. Council had set a cap of 3.5 % for transit but approved the transit commission’s request for the 5.6 % increase.

That was mighty welcome, said Ducharme, but it still leaves London Transit in the “uncomfortable” position of make tough choices soon.




It’ll be forced to choose between boosting service on existing routes or expanding into such unserviced areas as Lambeth, Riverbend, Summerside, Sunningdale and West Beaverbrook, Ducharme said later.

“I would dearly love to give Londoners the service they demand and want, but I can’t because of the limitations on our resource,” he said.

LTC ridership, on both buses and paratransit, has risen about 65% in 10 years, he said.

The commission’s ability to plan for the demand is hampered by uncertain long-term funding, a smaller contribution from the city than other municipalities provide and higher rider fares than in similar markets, he said.

The city gives London Transit 37 % of its budget, compared with the “fifty cent dollars” that “80 per cent of other Ontario cities” provide, said Jack Davis, commission chair.

Fares paid by transit riders provide 58 % of the LTC’s operating costs, compared with 45 to 48 per cent in such areas as Hamilton, Ottawa and York, said Ducharme.

“Our customers contribute more to our service than elsewhere and, after the recent increase in fares, we can’t ask them to do much more or we’ll be losing riders.”

With the economy tanking and city watching its budget closely, it may get harder to get council to make a larger transit commitment, said Ducharme. Under a strategic plan, the LTC wants the city to up its ante by 7.1 % next year, 9.9 % in 2011 and 8.2 % in 2012.

Percentage increases like that make city councillors nervous in tough times, conceded David Winninger and Harold Ushers, both councillors and commissioners.

“I think the majority of council is in support of the requirements of public transit,” said Usher. “Our big problem is to persuade the public that the expenditure is needed and warranted.”

The commission needs to do a better job selling its budget needs to the public, he said.

Another cost pressure may soon come from the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act if proposed regulations are adopted. The regulations would require installation of vocal and visual equipment to announce stops for the blind and deaf as well as special grab bars and seating, upgrades to bus stops and shelters and fare parity, among other things.

The LTC could face an initial cost of $1.5 million for upgrades and yearly compliance costs adding three % to its budget, Ducharme told commissioners.

The commission has told the province it favours a fully accessible service, but wants a phase-in of at least six years to reduce the impact of the cost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1625  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2009, 3:41 AM
ldoto's Avatar
ldoto ldoto is online now
Londoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London,Ont
Posts: 1,341
SWO wants $1B in provincial aid

SWO wants $1B in provincial aid

Mon, March 2, 2009

By NORMAN DE BONO , SUN MEDIA


The London region needs a $1-billion cash injection to help grow and diversity its battered economy, area municipalities told the provincial government today

Officials from the Southwest Economic Alliance (SWEA), an umbrella group for an area of 2.5 million people, pressed the region’s case in a high-level meeting with senior economic ministers and members of Premier Dalton McGuinty’s office.

They made their pitch, including funding to match $1 billion the federal government has pledged for an economic development fund for southern Ontario, ahead of the Liberal government’s March 26 budget, which is expected to put Ontario deep into red ink.

SWEA wants funding for efforts to help the region transition to a “knowledge-based” economy, such as for technology, advanced manufacturing and health sciences jobs.

That shopping list likely tops $1 billion, Stratford Mayor Dan Mathieson, the SWEA chairperson, said later




. “We told them we need investment in the area and funds have to be speeded up,” he said. Mathieson said the group “received a strong signal” the province recognizes the challenges the region is facing.

“They know we need help in this budget to help deliver renewed optimism for manufacturing and the economy across the southwest,” he said. “They want to work with us.”

Southwestern Ontario has lost thousands of jobs, especially in manufacturing, in the economic meltdown, including another 172 yesterday at Tilbury vehicle airbag maker Autoliv. It has 16 unionized workers left at the plant that once employed more than 600.

SWEA wants help in the spring provincial budget to:

— Invest in transportation and communications infrastructure and make border crossings more efficient.

— Fund programs set out in the Ontario Green Act and alternative energy generation; —Expand strategic investments in manufacturing to help improve innovation and productivity. — Greater support for agriculture to help create a more robust agri-food manufacturing and processing sector.

— Enhance ties between government, businesses and universities funding applied research, skills training and commercialization.

— Establish a Southwestern Ontario government caucus partnership with SWEA to ensure the region’s issues get immediate attention at Queen’s Park.

Southwestern Ontario politicians already have an economic caucus, and it met just more than a week ago, said Attorney General Chris Bentley of London, who helped to arrange the SWEA meeting.

“We have a very powerful region and we can attract more jobs as a region than as separate entities,” the London West MPP said of the meeting.

“It allows us to draw on strategic alliances. There is a lot going on in the region.” While it’s too early to say what will come out of the budget for Southwestern Ontario, SWEA has to focus on its business agenda, he added.

“The value of SWEA is not meeting with government — it is presenting our economic strengths as a region to business, to get jobs here.

“That is the real potential magic for SWEA,” Bentley said.

Mathieson and other SWEA officials met with Finance Minister Dwight Duncan, International Trade Minister Sandra Pupatello, Innovation and Research Minister John Wilkinson, Economic Development Minister Michael Bryant and senior McGuinty staff.

In its January budget the federal government created the Southern Ontario development agency, to invest $1 billion over five years to help small business and industry in a host of programs and services.

“We want (the province) to keep in mind what the federal government has contributed,” said Mathieson.

The province has madesome progress on the issues, Mathieson added, pointing to the new Ontario Green Energy Act, designed to create 50,000 jobs; the Ministry of Research and Innovation and by making economic development and trade separate ministries.

Last week, the province also announced nearly $8 million to fund more than 400 new PhD and master’s student openings at the University of Western Ontario.

SWEA will hold a meeting in London today at the London Convention Centre, from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

The alliance was formed in 2007 to promote regional economic co-operation. It represents 2.5 million people in 15 counties and regions, including London.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1626  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2009, 3:46 AM
sparky212's Avatar
sparky212 sparky212 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London Ont.
Posts: 506
so any news on the fantasy 30 storier
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1627  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2009, 5:05 AM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by ldoto View Post
London Transit has raised fares and is getting more money from city hall but still can’t meet rising demand for service, the transit boss says.

Another cost pressure may soon come from the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act if proposed regulations are adopted. The regulations would require installation of vocal and visual equipment to announce stops for the blind and deaf as well as special grab bars and seating, upgrades to bus stops and shelters and fare parity, among other things.
Can't London Transit get money from the provincial and federal governments for upgrades? Isn't that how Waterloo Region is going to fund its regional transit projects?

And didn't London Transit already install vocal and visual equipment to announce stops? Will they have to do it all over again?

If anything, I think London Transit should raise the bus pass rate for Western not by the currently proposed 8%, but by 12 or 13%. Considering how many of the transit users are post-secondary students, they should be paying for the system they are putting demands on. I'm a Western student and I'm willing to pay more for the pass, not full price but something higher than the current $120 for eight months or whatever it is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1628  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2009, 1:41 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Touching grass everyday.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 51,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatTallNorth2 View Post
The problem was nothing to do with the business model. Costco does very well.

Sam's Club failed in London because they built on the outskirts of the city and did not anticipate Costco opening a second location in London. Costco's location was much better in a more developed part of the city. Also, Sam's Club failed because it is not much different than Costco, except with with Walmarts tacky uniforms. London is simply not big enough to support 3 club stores.

Sams Club is rather like Costco, but too walmarty. I shop at Costco very often (my membership fee is essentially free. As an executive member, I get a 2% voucher of my yearly purchases, which more than pays for membership). I've visited Sam's Club, but:
1. I would rather not see Walmart get any more of my money.
2. Sam's Club does not meet the same level of professionalism (e.g., tacky walfart uniforms, apathetic staff).
3. Sam's Club Prices are good, but the quality is hit or miss (whereas at Costco, the Quality is usually excellent, and the prices about as good as you will find on quality merchandise).
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1629  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2009, 8:17 PM
QuantumLeap QuantumLeap is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparky212 View Post
so any news on the fantasy 30 storier
Talbot Square I and II? Two London Place? The Library Tower?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1630  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2009, 3:22 AM
sparky212's Avatar
sparky212 sparky212 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London Ont.
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumLeap View Post
Talbot Square I and II? Two London Place? The Library Tower?
soho goodwill tower
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1631  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2009, 3:47 AM
london2020 london2020 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 50
Does anyone know exactly when Sam's Club will close and if they will open it to the public at all in order to liquidate?

Edit: found my answer:

Beginning on March 9, 2009 7 a.m., for a limited time, the Clubs will be opened to the general public. All merchandise will be available while supplies last only.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1632  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2009, 4:32 AM
ldoto's Avatar
ldoto ldoto is online now
Londoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London,Ont
Posts: 1,341
Development Planned for SOHO Neighbourhood


Quote:
Originally Posted by sparky212
soho goodwill tower


GOODWILL INDUSTRIES in partnership with SOHO London is inviting members of the public to a special meeting on Wednesday, October 29.
The meeting will outline Goodwill Industries' plans for a multi-use development on 2.8 acres at Horton and Wellington streets, SOHO's main intersection.

The public meeting will be held at Wellington Street United Church at 7 p.m. Although details are sketchy, the development is described as a "multi-purpose, diverse community and corporate centre."

Advance word is that Goodwill is proposing to build a 30-storey highrise complex which will include retails shops at ground level, several floors of office space and then apartments or condominiums.

The complex is expected to include some accessible housing to meet the mandate of Goodwill Industries.

This development will likely mean that several of the retail establishments along Wellington and Horton will have to relocate.

Anyone with questions is invited to contact Julie Watson at 519-850-9675, ext. 250 or by email at [email protected].

It is expected that the meeting will draw a large crowd since this is the first major development to be proposed for the neighborhood.

SOHO residents are already questioning how the planned upscale development will fit in with the nearby Center of Hope emergency housing complex, operated by the Salvation Army, and the geared-to-income highrise apartment building on Simcoe Street which is operated by the London Housing Authority.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1633  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2009, 1:39 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Touching grass everyday.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 51,176
More bad news for London. The daily dose.

London Free Press (March 4/09):
Quote:
Morning show cut, 48 jobs eliminated

Wed, March 4, 2009

By KATHY RUMLESKI, FREE PRESS REPORTER

Local TV has moved into unchartered territory with the loss of almost 50 employees in Southwestern Ontario amid growing fears London's A station may close.

"We're facing a future where, very shortly, cities the size of London and Hamilton may not have local television service. This hasn't happened since local TV began in the '50s," said A London employee Scott Burton, the unit vice-chair of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers union.

Forty-eight people in the London area or about 35 per cent of staff were issued layoff notices yesterday.

Eligible union employees have until Friday to use their bumping rights under the collective agreement.

The broader picture saw parent CTV slash 118 jobs at its A television operations across the country yesterday, including outlets in Barrie and Ottawa.

The 48 local losses include previously announced cuts in Windsor and Wingham, where stations will close Aug. 31.

Some employees who help run those newscasts work in London and face layoffs.

One casualty yesterday was A Morning based at Covent Garden Market.

The breakfast show aired for the last time yesterday and within an hour employees learned they no longer had jobs.

That includes hosts Jeremy-John Dunton and Cheryl Weedmark, along with producers, directors, camera operators and writers.

"We knew things weren't going well . . . but we didn't expect this at all," said Dunton.

"The morning show ratings are good. We expanded the show (from two to three hours) last fall."

Morning show employees are done immediately, while some staff will remain on until Friday. More are losing their jobs in August.

The 6 p.m., 11 p.m. and weekend newscasts in London are safe for now, but the bleeding may not be over.

Station manager Don Mumford expressed fear of more cuts and even acknowledged the station could close.

"I look at a station in Hamilton or a station in Victoria and if stations in those markets can close down, no one can say London is immune."

In Hamilton, CHCH, owned by struggling media giant Canwest Global, is on the block. The Victoria TV station is part of the A channel network.

Mumford said yesterday's news "takes your breath away, especially for a legacy station such as CFPL-TV."

In London, the morning show hours of 6 to 9 a.m. will be replaced with the rebroadcasting of the half-hour 11 p.m. newscast from the night before, called A News Encore.

Mumford said the rebroadcast fulfils the station's mandate for local programming spelled out in its broadcast licence agreement with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), although Burton expressed disappointment the repeated programming is accepted.

Some employees hope the community will rally around them and the station.

"We're hoping people will fight for their local television station. Local television does matter. Pretty soon it may be extinct if something doesn't get done about it," said sportscaster Brent Lale, who is out of work Aug. 31.

Both Mumford and Burton laid blame at the feet of the CRTC that has refused to let conventional TV stations charge subscription fees and forced them to rely only on advertising revenue.

"We have been lobbying vigorously to the CRTC to change the model," Mumford said.

He also expressed concern about the loss of checks and balances in the community as other news outlets shrink as well.

"Fundamentally it's a much bigger issue. There's a problem in our democracy."

CEP Local 87-M president Brad Honywill said the toll on local television is devastating.

"The community is losing part of its identity," he said.

"The CRTC and the Canadian government have to make some changes to support community stations, and we'll be doing everything we can to assist that effort."

The union also lashed out at CTV, saying it broke a promise not to erode local programming.

CTVglobemedia purchased CHUM Ltd., including the A-Channel group of stations, in 2007.

Last summer, A-Channel was rebranded A.

Long known as CFPL-TV, the station began business in 1953 as Canada's second privately owned TV station. It was also called Channel 10.

Kathy Rumleski is a Free Press reporter.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1634  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2009, 7:53 PM
QuantumLeap QuantumLeap is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 206
I don't really think this has much to do with London. There is a recession on, after all, and then there is the general shrinking of the traditional media sector - newspapers, magazines and TV are all feeling the pinch (independently of the recession). Given the closing of the stations in Wingham and Windsor, A London may actually grow in its field of operation as a SW Ontario-wide station once things settle down, provided it doesn't close in the mean time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1635  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 2:16 AM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Touching grass everyday.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 51,176
Well, it is A-Channel's London station, and London's morning show, which is taped at the Covent Market...I do believe it has plenty to do with London, neh?
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1636  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 4:33 AM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
Well, it is A-Channel's London station, and London's morning show, which is taped at the Covent Market...I do believe it has plenty to do with London, neh?
Yeah, and where's the cutbacks in Toronto? What's that? Global extending their late news to a full hour?

London not having a local television station would be unthinkable. One could argue Rogers Cable 13 could fill the role, but they are only available on cable and only in the immediate London area. I don't even know if they're in St. Thomas or Strathroy. Satellite and over-the-air viewers would lose out.

I hope the CBC is prepared to step in and do something to ensure continued local service in this region, should CFPL end up folding.

Last edited by manny_santos; Mar 5, 2009 at 1:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1637  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 1:55 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Touching grass everyday.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 51,176
I have appeared on A-Morning a couple of times (interviewed...I am in academia). Oh well, there is still the LFP.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1638  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 2:48 PM
GreatTallNorth2 GreatTallNorth2 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,747
I am not sure how a place like Erie, Pennsylvania can have six TV stations and London can barely hold on to one station. It's metro population is 295,000 and London's metro is close to 500,000. Almost all those stations would have news teams and offices, etc. What gives?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1639  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 5:10 PM
ForestryW's Avatar
ForestryW ForestryW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 307
A-Channel broadcasts publicly (i.e.: you don't need cable), but that will soon change.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1640  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 11:30 PM
sparky212's Avatar
sparky212 sparky212 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London Ont.
Posts: 506
I was looking at kitcheners dt and they have a hell of a lot of parking lots. I think for its size dt Kitchener has mor lots than London. It's still sad that 2 great cities should have that many lots
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Projects & Construction Updates
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:18 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.