HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1621  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 8:52 AM
Kingofthehill's Avatar
Kingofthehill Kingofthehill is offline
International
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,046
great updates!
     
     
  #1622  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 9:35 AM
bobdreamz's Avatar
bobdreamz bobdreamz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miami
Posts: 8,241

https://c1.staticflickr.com/8/7406/27911830176_f00ca04a63_b.jpg

^ Just curious but is this a all wood building? Condo / Hotel / Office ? Is this the construction norm in LA?
__________________
Miami : 70 Skyscrapers over 500+ Ft.|150+ Meters | 10 Under Construction.
     
     
  #1623  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 10:52 AM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419


What are these? And have they recently painted the Bunker Hill Towers? It looks like they've added corner balconies. Interesting.
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #1624  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 12:09 PM
ByTheBay ByTheBay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 102
What was the occasion for the fireworks off of US Bank tower? Is it the opening of their observation deck? They should start doing that for New Years!
     
     
  #1625  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 2:33 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,287
bobdreamz, that's Topaz, a 6-story apartment building in the Historic Core neighborhood of downtown. For buildings shorter than 75 feet, concrete + wood framing (Type III Construction) is common in LA. Typically the first 1-2 stories are steel-reinforced concrete, topped by 4-5 stories of wood-frame construction. Taller than 75 feet, building code requires concrete and/or steel construction.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #1626  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 3:16 PM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,705
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandonJXN View Post
What are these? And have they recently painted the Bunker Hill Towers? It looks like they've added corner balconies. Interesting.
I'm not a fan of the multi color paint job of that low rise office bldg on Fig st which was built back in the early 1980s.

In comparison, I've always liked the original lighter, two tone color finish of the bunker hill towers apt bldgs, which has since been painted over.

In turn, the low rise condo bldg built directly to the west of the original tallest 32 story BH apt tower....which was converted to condos quite awhile back.....was painted a dark green several yrs ago, I wince every time I see that.

the renovation of the 2 shorter bh tower apt bldgs that are almost 50 yrs old has been underway for over a yr. Your comment about them made me finally take the time to look more thoroughly at an article I recall glancing over when I first came across it last yr. I'm not too sure about the new darker exterior color or the need to insert fussy looking corner balconies....which most tenants in apt bldgs don't ever really use or need.


Quote:

image courtesy of Essex, la downtownnews.com

Peeking into a unit at the Bunker Hill Towers is an exercise in familiarity, assuming you’ve toured one of Downtown Los Angeles’ many new apartment buildings. The hardwood floors glisten, the kitchens tout speckled Caesarstone countertops, sleek dark cabinetry and stainless-steel appliances, and the bathrooms gleam with modern fixtures and finishes.

In short, the units look like any of the new Downtown apartments that charge in the range of $4 a square foot. The major difference is that the complex at 234 S. Figueroa St. is more than 40 years old.

Palo Alto-based Essex Property Trust purchased the Bunker Hill Towers, composed of two 19-story buildings, in 1998. Now it is spending $76 million on the biggest renovation in the property’s history. The upgrade of the 1969 complex is expected to finish in late 2017, when nearly all of the 456 apartments will have been reworked.

The budget breaks down to about $170,000 per apartment, with about a month and a half spent on each unit, said Adam Berry, Essex’s senior vice president of asset management. While the price tag is high, the renovation will allow the building to compete with some of the upscale rental complexes in Downtown.

The renovation actually began in late 2013. The lengthy timeline is partly because Essex is waiting for units to vacate before beginning improvements, Berry said. Most of the apartments — 398 residences — are rent-controlled, and the company is offering to temporarily relocate tenants to other apartments while the work takes place.

The project will include infrastructure upgrades, among them a new HVAC (heating/ventilating/air conditioning) system and new plumbing lines so that each apartment can have its own washer and dryer. All the windows will be replaced with more energy-efficient panes. On the exterior of the towers, Essex has proposed installing full-size balconies on corner units (city approval is still required); center units would get smaller “Juliet” balconies with sliding glass doors.
     
     
  #1627  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 4:51 PM
ChelseaFC's Avatar
ChelseaFC ChelseaFC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandonJXN View Post

What are these? And have they recently painted the Bunker Hill Towers? It looks like they've added corner balconies. Interesting.
Consult the Oracle...er, development map.

https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1mTXj5STlZz66Dzs2MS9ZWmlfONI

1. http://www.ladowntownnews.com/news/reboo...805fe36-b955-11e5-95d0-7b96158faeb4.html

2. BUNKER HILL TOWERS UPGRADE: The $76 million renovation of the Bunker Hill Towers from owner Essex Apartment Homes continues, with the goal to upgrade 456 apartments in the 1969 complex by the end of 2017. The exact timing depends on when existing tenants leave or transfer to a temporary unit while improvements are made. The work in the pair of 19-story buildings at 234 S. Figueroa St. includes new HVAC systems and plumbing lines. All the windows are being replaced with more energy-efficient panes, and Essex plans to add full-size balconies on corner units and smaller balconies with sliding glass doors on center apartments. The plan includes the creation of a two-story amenity center, with a gym and pool deck, along Third Street between Flower and Figueroa streets, on a current parking lot. That work is expected to take place in 2017.
     
     
  #1628  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 6:33 PM
mdiederi's Avatar
mdiederi mdiederi is offline
4
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: JT
Posts: 4,901
Berkshire Group is renovating One Santa Fe to better “blend in” with neighborhood

The firm may be responding to scathing architectural criticism of the massive residential complex

June 27, 2016 09:30AM


http://therealdeal.com/la/2016/06/27/berkshire-group-is-redeveloping-the-brand-new-one-santa-fe/

Quote:
One Santa Fe, the contentious 434-unit apartment complex widely considered to be the linchpin of gentrification in the Arts District, will be renovated to better blend in with the neighborhood, its new owner Berkshire Group announced Friday.

. . . “DTLA, and in particular the Arts District, is one of the most exciting submarkets in the country,” Berkshire SVP of family acquisitions Eric Schrumpf told GlobeSt.com. “We want the property to blend in with and remain true to the original nature of the Arts District.”
     
     
  #1629  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 8:28 PM
caligrad's Avatar
caligrad caligrad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 1,835
^^^ kinda sad that a building already has to go through renovation when its barely a few years (2-3?) years old. One Santa Fe is fine for what it is and where it is. But in all honestly, it should have been broken up into segments instead of being two long monolithic structures.
     
     
  #1630  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 8:48 PM
ocman ocman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Burlingame
Posts: 2,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by caligrad View Post
^^^ kinda sad that a building already has to go through renovation when its barely a few years (2-3?) years old. One Santa Fe is fine for what it is and where it is. But in all honestly, it should have been broken up into segments instead of being two long monolithic structures.
I hope it's just a paint job and landscaping. Red is always harsh. Otherwise, the building is fine and is not given enough credit for being more seamlessly integrated than a lot of the new proposals in that area, even for it's size. It works well conforming to and even insulating the rest of the area from the existing tracks. If the new owners have an issue with it, it's likely because no one wants to live in a complex abutted on train tracks. Or it's an issue of Berkshire just needing to put their stamp on new acquisitions.
     
     
  #1631  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 8:57 PM
ozp ozp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by caligrad View Post
^^^ kinda sad that a building already has to go through renovation when its barely a few years (2-3?) years old. One Santa Fe is fine for what it is and where it is. But in all honestly, it should have been broken up into segments instead of being two long monolithic structures.
My guess, by "renovation" they really mean just repainting the whole thing.
     
     
  #1632  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 9:04 PM
caligrad's Avatar
caligrad caligrad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 1,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocman View Post
I hope it's just a paint job and landscaping. Red is always harsh. Otherwise, the building is fine and is not given enough credit for being more seamlessly integrated than a lot of the new proposals in that area, even for it's size. It works well conforming to and even insulating the rest of the area from the existing tracks. If the new owners have an issue with it, it's likely because no one wants to live in a complex abutted on train tracks. Or it's an issue of Berkshire just needing to put their stamp on new acquisitions.
I agree. I mean, there isn't much that can be done to force it to integrate to the surrounding area. Its a giant, what I like to call Greek Santorini inspired, white building with red thrown in. You cant do much to it unless they plan on completely rebuilding the façade which I hope they don't. Seeing how the surrounding area is still 1-3 story factories, One Santa fe wont truly fit in until its surroundings are filled in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozp View Post
My guess, by "renovation" they really mean just repainting the whole thing.
I hope not. I cant picture it in any other color. If they dull it down with browns,greys and black, it will immediately end up looking like a housing project.
     
     
  #1633  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 9:29 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocman View Post
I hope it's just a paint job and landscaping. Red is always harsh. Otherwise, the building is fine and is not given enough credit for being more seamlessly integrated than a lot of the new proposals in that area, even for it's size. It works well conforming to and even insulating the rest of the area from the existing tracks. If the new owners have an issue with it, it's likely because no one wants to live in a complex abutted on train tracks. Or it's an issue of Berkshire just needing to put their stamp on new acquisitions.
The main thing they can do to improve it is to remodel the parking ramp exposure and the way the building interacts with the streets around it.
     
     
  #1634  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 9:47 PM
NSMP NSMP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 522
I still love one Santa Fe. Think it looks excellent as is.
__________________
https://redlinereader.wordpress.com/ - Covering Transit Issues in Los Angeles
     
     
  #1635  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 9:58 PM
Jun's Avatar
Jun Jun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by NSMP View Post
I still love one Santa Fe. Think it looks excellent as is.
Same. A bit too long perhaps, and maybe I'd hide the spiral parking ramp better
     
     
  #1636  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2016, 11:27 PM
NativeOrange's Avatar
NativeOrange NativeOrange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Westminster/Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jun View Post
Same. A bit too long perhaps, and maybe I'd hide the spiral parking ramp better
Same! I hate how it's placed directly at the end of 3rd street. So instead of looking down the street terminating at a street wall or shops, you just look straight into a parking ramp.
     
     
  #1637  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2016, 12:37 AM
Muji's Avatar
Muji Muji is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,190
I agree about the ramp. It also bothers me that there is a no crossing sign on one side of that intersection. But otherwise I quite like the color scheme myself, and I can't imagine how renovating One Santa Fe to "blend in" could possibly be a good idea.
__________________
My blog of then and now photos of LA: http://urbandiachrony.wordpress.com
     
     
  #1638  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2016, 1:00 AM
scania's Avatar
scania scania is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA (DTLA)/Atlanta, Ga. (Midtown)
Posts: 2,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by citywatch View Post
I'm not a fan of the multi color paint job of that low rise office bldg on Fig st which was built back in the early 1980s.

In comparison, I've always liked the original lighter, two tone color finish of the bunker hill towers apt bldgs, which has since been painted over.

In turn, the low rise condo bldg built directly to the west of the original tallest 32 story BH apt tower....which was converted to condos quite awhile back.....was painted a dark green several yrs ago, I wince every time I see that.

the renovation of the 2 shorter bh tower apt bldgs that are almost 50 yrs old has been underway for over a yr. Your comment about them made me finally take the time to look more thoroughly at an article I recall glancing over when I first came across it last yr. I'm not too sure about the new darker exterior color or the need to insert fussy looking corner balconies....which most tenants in apt bldgs don't ever really use or need.
I totally disagree. Bunker Hill Towers are really starting to look good and up to date. The balconies do a lot for the exterior look. I've heard nothing but compliments on the renovation. As far as balconies, people use balconies in apartments all the time. Whether people or smoking, having drinks, etc. it adds another element to be able to do that outside on a balcony. Also, especially being in the city, people love to go outside on the balcony and take in the views.
__________________
It's a beautiful day!
     
     
  #1639  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2016, 4:47 AM
cesar90 cesar90 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 433

Last edited by cesar90; Jun 29, 2016 at 5:04 AM.
     
     
  #1640  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2016, 2:55 PM
Eightball's Avatar
Eightball Eightball is offline
life is good
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: all over
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muji View Post
I agree about the ramp. It also bothers me that there is a no crossing sign on one side of that intersection. But otherwise I quite like the color scheme myself, and I can't imagine how renovating One Santa Fe to "blend in" could possibly be a good idea.
yup
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:02 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.