HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2013, 11:41 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,207
Quote:
Originally Posted by ih8pickingusernames View Post
I have seen that project, but it isn't confirmed yet.
Do you think supertall just fall outta the sky?

The fact we have 7 supertalls in some form of development should be enough to keep you satisfied until the city gives approval to one of them, and hopefully the one with a developer willing to follow through.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2013, 10:19 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,773
Nice work Winny.. keep it up.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2013, 11:33 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
Why is surpassing FCP so important?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 2:13 AM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Why is surpassing FCP so important?
I think because there are so many other cities out there, not just in canada, that are getting a new tallest, or even several of them, but Toronto has been stuck with it's tallest for 38 years now... There is also somewhat of a prestige factor involved in having a supertall in your city, and thats what Toronto will get if FCP is surpassed. (Technically a taller tower can be built but yet still not be a supertall I suppose, 299 metres, but that seems rather unlikely to me)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 4:00 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by koops65 View Post
I think because there are so many other cities out there, not just in canada, that are getting a new tallest, or even several of them, but Toronto has been stuck with it's tallest for 38 years now... There is also somewhat of a prestige factor involved in having a supertall in your city, and thats what Toronto will get if FCP is surpassed. (Technically a taller tower can be built but yet still not be a supertall I suppose, 299 metres, but that seems rather unlikely to me)

That's what I thought. I just don't get it. Competing with Asia height wise is out of the question and the list of metropolises with supertalls is not exactly impressive. Every couple of week someone posts almost the exact same thing with no explanation as to why and with an air of hubris in light of the condo boom's accomplishment. We will have statistically distanced ourselves from the rest of the Canada/US pack and will be looking ahead to Chicago whether FCP gets surpassed or not and, despite the recent release of supertall visions, it doesn't look like we will surpass FCP anytime soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 4:26 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by koops65 View Post
I think because there are so many other cities out there, not just in canada, that are getting a new tallest, or even several of them, but Toronto has been stuck with it's tallest for 38 years now... There is also somewhat of a prestige factor involved in having a supertall in your city, and thats what Toronto will get if FCP is surpassed. (Technically a taller tower can be built but yet still not be a supertall I suppose, 299 metres, but that seems rather unlikely to me)
I'm not sure that there's any prestige left in having a 1000' skyscraper in your city. Maybe back in the 70's that was an impressive status symbol, but not today.

A supertall should be in the top 20, which would mean a tower of at least 1261', at least for now. There are something like 30 towers under construction that are taller than 1261'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 4:55 AM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,528
Right now there are 70 built supertalls, but only 30 cities currently have a supertall. Dubai, New York, Hong Kong, Shanghai and Chicago comprise the lions share of supertalls. There are also 80 under construction, in 23 other cities other than the previous 30, for a total of 150 supertalls, in 53 cities.
Thats a pretty exclusive list, compared to all the cities, and all the thousands (3630 built and U/C 150M+) of skyscrapers, in the entire world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 8:09 PM
ih8pickingusernames ih8pickingusernames is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by koops65 View Post
I think because there are so many other cities out there, not just in canada, that are getting a new tallest, or even several of them, but Toronto has been stuck with it's tallest for 38 years now... There is also somewhat of a prestige factor involved in having a supertall in your city, and thats what Toronto will get if FCP is surpassed. (Technically a taller tower can be built but yet still not be a supertall I suppose, 299 metres, but that seems rather unlikely to me)
Exactly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 5:18 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Why is surpassing FCP so important?
Because it's time . . . Long overdue in fact (IMO), and it's exciting.
Actually I think Koops summed it up perfectly (see post 1763).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 5:38 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,065
Does it even make economic sense to build a supertall in Toronto? At some point the cost of construction would undermine the economic advantage you would get from a piece of property. Maybe that's why Toronto hasn't seen anything higher than FCP, since it was built decades ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 2:16 AM
DrNest's Avatar
DrNest DrNest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,119
Koops, those are my thoughts exactly. Even the 299m tower!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 2:43 AM
Gresto's Avatar
Gresto Gresto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,024
I love FCP, but I think maybe it is time its title as Toronto's tallest is usurped. It's not going anywhere. It'll still be there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 4:25 AM
roccerfeller's Avatar
roccerfeller roccerfeller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 2,930
Really nice to see Edmonton and Winnipeg stepping it up, hopefully Québec City does too, and that new tallest in Hamilton will look fine if it gets done

I love what's going on in other cities like Toronto and Vancouver, but its the smaller cities whose skylines are more noticeably impacted by say doubling their numbers or getting a new standout. Good on the country, and good to see everyone is moving forward. This decade is certainly turning out to be a good one for high rises!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2013, 11:16 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,207
10 years from now, 2 of the 7 might have made it or will be on their way to making it into reality.

Funny enough, the one with the shortest timeframe would be pinnacle, if the city gives them the greenlight.

The other 5 are smash and build projects which will impact significantly on their timelines.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2013, 9:36 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,438
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2013, 2:19 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,829
That's what suburbs should look like.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2013, 2:21 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Pass me the Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 50,882
Wow, what a change for good ol' Whalley. I worked in Whalley for a few years in the mid nineties.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2013, 7:37 AM
thmx thmx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,381
Just using paint, I filled in most of the major projects in downtown Hamilton that will have a big impact on the skyline.
All of the buildings, except two, have either been approved or are under construction. The two buildings that have not
yet been approved, should be, when the full plan is revealed within the next 2 months.





*The location for the 44 floor tower has not been released yet, but it is rumored to be built on the location of what is currently Sir John A.
MacDonald Secondary School, so that is where I put it.


Photos Taken By: Jaybird | Posted On: skyscrapercity.com | Edited By Me
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2013, 3:03 PM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeIsThomas View Post
Oh...my god, Hamilton!

I knew this city was starting to get busy with core construction, but this picture really brings that into perspective. This is exciting!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2013, 3:06 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is online now
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,899
I'm so glad for Hamilton. In certain ways, I see a kindred spirit between hamilton and Montreal; both neglected cities of sorts, brushed aside for some time, and now both resurrecting and beginning to rise again!

Vive Hamilton!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:20 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.