Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarface
Less on construction, and more about the riverfront This is not for certain but people have brought up the Peticodiac river, and the fact it isn't taking back it's original shape because while the flood gates where closed the tide was bringing in sand, and rocks, and now there talking about potentially dredging the river back into it's original width, and depth or close to it. I know for a fact the money to do it isn't there as of yet, and wonder how the city or cities, and towns could get the money in to do so...
|
I can confidently predict this won't happen.
The main reason why the river has not returned (fully) to it's original width is that the causeway has not been removed. They've opened the floodgates, which has certainly helped, but the cost to remove the causeway is staggering - at least $80M or so.
The reasoning to remove the causeway is now purely cosmetic. The environmental issues have mostly already been addressed by simply opening the gates. The fish habitat has been restored and the tidal flushing action to the (former) head pond has been reestablished.
The federal & provincial governments aren't going to sink $80-100M into this project when there are more pressing issues at hand. This isn't even including the costs of dredging and silt removal which would be similarly huge. Nope, not ever going to happen.
If you've driven over the causeway recently, I'm sure you've noticed that the former head pond is well on it's way to becoming a brackish salt water marsh. Pretty soon the Petitcodiac to the west of the causeway will look like the Petitcodiac to the east. With another few years of siltation and marshification of the head pond, it will be too late to do anything anyway.