HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1581  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2025, 7:57 PM
Jstange059's Avatar
Jstange059 Jstange059 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 400
As I understand it, it sounds like they are planning on building the 606 extension across the river as long as the extension across the highway is built. Well, that seems like a good thing to ask about in the upcoming community meeting.

I myself really don't care much about a Southport bridge, but I'm curious about the Wabansia/Clifton bridge that they say is proposed that I really haven't heard any details about, but that is in the south part of the site which really isn't being planned right now. Also curious about a timing for the Kingsbury extension, and whether that would be completed in this first phase or along with the south part of the site.
__________________
@that-person.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1582  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2025, 1:08 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,797
I had to leave the meeting early, but the tallest tower could rise 520’

I left 1/2 through the Q&A, and at that point there was no negative comments towards the project.

They want to go before plan commission in December.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1583  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2025, 4:08 AM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,167
I mean it got a bit more dicey after you left but nothing crazy. Just mainly density complaints and oddly enough parking complaints? Seems counterintuitive if you’re worried about traffic…

Regardless interesting to note that JDL seemed very confident that they can get the first phase going starting next year around this time; financing is secured.
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1584  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2025, 1:05 PM
dreamy-developer's Avatar
dreamy-developer dreamy-developer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchymunch View Post
I mean it got a bit more dicey after you left but nothing crazy. Just mainly density complaints and oddly enough parking complaints? Seems counterintuitive if you’re worried about traffic…

Regardless interesting to note that JDL seemed very confident that they can get the first phase going starting next year around this time; financing is secured.
I myself as a side-note am very interested on where JDLs priorities are. They now have 2-3 projects in Chicago.

- Moody Bible North Union Project in River North
- The two towers at 1200 W Fulton St in Fulton Market
- And now the LY/Foundry Park.

All of these are not small developments either. I know that with the Chestnut building maybe happening in the next year, with the demo of the Franklin midrise done that if those two are built the North Union project would be half way complete, but you still have 4 massive towers that I'd imagine aren't cheap to build in today's economy still.

They must have access to some deep pockets if they are dedicated to juggling all of this and getting them done in the near/far future, or at least have a lot of optimism. I have faith they will get it all done though. Just interesting nevertheless on where they're focused on most, as I personally want them to finish/get North Union completed.
__________________
All I want are bus lanes on Michigan Ave
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1585  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2025, 2:07 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamy-developer View Post
I myself as a side-note am very interested on where JDLs priorities are. They now have 2-3 projects in Chicago.

- Moody Bible North Union Project in River North
- The two towers at 1200 W Fulton St in Fulton Market
- And now the LY/Foundry Park.

All of these are not small developments either. I know that with the Chestnut building maybe happening in the next year, with the demo of the Franklin midrise done that if those two are built the North Union project would be half way complete, but you still have 4 massive towers that I'd imagine aren't cheap to build in today's economy still.

They must have access to some deep pockets if they are dedicated to juggling all of this and getting them done in the near/far future, or at least have a lot of optimism. I have faith they will get it all done though. Just interesting nevertheless on where they're focused on most, as I personally want them to finish/get North Union completed.
Their priority is going to be what the submarkets are doing. If demand dries up around North Union somewhat FP will probably get more attention sooner. Leasing up new units in LP is going to be pretty easy given the huge lack of any new stock in the neighborhood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1586  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2025, 2:29 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
I had to leave the meeting early, but the tallest tower could rise 520’
What was the tallest proposed building under SB's plan? Just shy of 600'?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1587  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2025, 3:34 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,740
^ Yup, 590 feet
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1588  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2025, 6:33 PM
MorganChi's Avatar
MorganChi MorganChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 224
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstange059 View Post
Curious what you don't like about it?
It would’ve been nice if the tallest building was 700ft like the original plan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1589  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2025, 7:48 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorganChi View Post
It would’ve been nice if the tallest building was 700ft like the original plan
I don't think 700' was ever on the table, was it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1590  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2025, 9:48 PM
Jstange059's Avatar
Jstange059 Jstange059 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorganChi View Post
It would’ve been nice if the tallest building was 700ft like the original plan

Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
I don't think 700' was ever on the table, was it?



Yeah, looking at the old Lincoln Yards masterplan, it looks like they were planning 2 595 ft towers, but yeah, nothing near 700 ft. And while I am perhaps sad to lose 75 ft of height, I really don't care considering that it's not like Lincoln Yards was ever going to be built. And as much as I may like a tall building, we can't pretend that these sort of height games have any sort of actual importance or substance behind them
__________________
@that-person.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1591  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2025, 10:14 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,263
I care much more about getting this built to help facilitate a better urban fabric between Lincoln Park and Bucktown. Any highrises, for me, is icing on the cake, and I still hope at some point in the future, Metra can ramp up service at the Clybourn stop and maybe even rebuild it.

I live in Logan Square, and you don't realize how close these neighborhoods are until you bike from Logan/Bucktown to Lincoln Park via 606 and Courtland - It's such low hanging fruit that will do wonders for the North Side in this area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1592  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2025, 1:31 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
^ Yup, 590 feet
In November 2018 the thought was 650'.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1593  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2025, 1:02 AM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,740
Zoning app for Foundry Park is up: https://chicityclerkelms.chicago.gov/Matter/?matterId=5F6F7B24-0DD6-F011-8543-001DD8066465

I'm not able to post pictures at the moment, but the tallest building will be 520 ft and the project will have 3,737 units!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1594  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2025, 2:56 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 7,568
Looks like the tallest will be even - if only slightly - higher than that 520 ft number. . . hopefully they will build it. . .

more from Crains - https://www.chicagobusiness.com/commerci...lopers-seek-ok-former-lincoln-yards-site

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1595  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2025, 8:00 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,740
Novak Construction is buying the southern half of Lincoln Yards.

Buyer emerges for southern slice of stalled Lincoln Yards
Quote:
Novak is finalizing a deal to purchase more than 18 acres along the Chicago River between Lincoln Park and Bucktown from a venture of Chicago developer Sterling Bay and New York-based J.P. Morgan Asset Management, people familiar with the matter confirmed. The property was slated to become the southern portion of the $6 billion, 14 million-square-foot Lincoln Yards megaproject for which Sterling Bay won city approval in 2019.

In a separate transaction, Novak is also closing in on the purchase of the 284,463-square-foot building on the southern edge of the property at 1229 W. Concord Place, sources said. The contractor is poised to buy that empty property — built during the pandemic to accommodate life sciences research tenants that never came — from a venture of Sterling Bay, J.P. Morgan and Chicago-based Harrison Street Real Estate Capital, which have been marketing it for sale in recent months.

The pending purchase price for the land and building were not immediately clear, but Novak CEO John Novak confirmed the price for the land was well below the roughly $200 million that Sterling Bay and J.P. Morgan had spent assembling the property, according to industry publication Real Deal Chicago, which first reported Novak's agreement for the land.
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/commerci...ction-buy-southern-portion-lincoln-yards
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1596  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2025, 11:03 PM
Bonsai Tree's Avatar
Bonsai Tree Bonsai Tree is offline
Small but Mighty
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Novak Construction is buying the southern half of Lincoln Yards.

Buyer emerges for southern slice of stalled Lincoln Yards

https://www.chicagobusiness.com/commerci...ction-buy-southern-portion-lincoln-yards
Genuinely fascinated by this. They have little experience outside a few grocery stores and the Sears 6 Corners redevelopment. Kinda hope they partner with JDL on the development. Wonder how much they paid and how big they need to go to recoup their investment. It has to be more than JDL offered (60 mil) but clearly not by much, given the "bargain" they received on it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1597  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2025, 11:18 PM
ChicagoLVR ChicagoLVR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonsai Tree View Post
Genuinely fascinated by this. They have little experience outside a few grocery stores and the Sears 6 Corners redevelopment. Kinda hope they partner with JDL on the development. Wonder how much they paid and how big they need to go to recoup their investment. It has to be more than JDL offered (60 mil) but clearly not by much, given the "bargain" they received on it.
Is it possible they're buying it, building infrastructure, then selling parcels off? I just can't see them having the ability, by themselves, to have a development that matches the impact of Foundry Park. I think having a mix of developers would be a good thing to diversify architecture instead of it feeling corporate/stale. It would be brilliant on their part to double dip -- sell the parcel and act as GC for new construction of what is built on that parcel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1598  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2025, 3:55 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonsai Tree View Post
Genuinely fascinated by this. They have little experience outside a few grocery stores and the Sears 6 Corners redevelopment. Kinda hope they partner with JDL on the development. Wonder how much they paid and how big they need to go to recoup their investment. It has to be more than JDL offered (60 mil) but clearly not by much, given the "bargain" they received on it.
Yeah they've been around for awhile doing suburban stuff and mostly GC. But they did the Six Corners project, and they are doing multifam at the other former Sears store at North & Harlem in Galewood.

Since it's Novak, though, I'm concerned this is a play for a big warehouse. LY South is a big and roughly rectangular site with proximity to wealthy neighborhoods, so it's well suited for a last mile e-commerce warehouse. I don't think Novak is one of Amazon's preferred developers, but they could certainly partner with Wal Mart, Wayfair or another big online retailer.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1599  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2025, 5:17 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Yeah they've been around for awhile doing suburban stuff and mostly GC. But they did the Six Corners project, and they are doing multifam at the other former Sears store at North & Harlem in Galewood.

Since it's Novak, though, I'm concerned this is a play for a big warehouse. LY South is a big and roughly rectangular site with proximity to wealthy neighborhoods, so it's well suited for a last mile e-commerce warehouse. I don't think Novak is one of Amazon's preferred developers, but they could certainly partner with Wal Mart, Wayfair or another big online retailer.
Was previous LY PD zoning for the South parcel already approved?
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1600  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2025, 5:05 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,913
Yes. Novak would need a zoning change to build a warehouse here, and that's sure to be contentious. They'll probably try to greenwash it with a riverwalk that they're legally obligated to build anyway, and some cheapo murals covering the blank walls. Honestly they would have a pretty good argument for traffic, the site used to be 2FM and had thousands of garbage trucks coming and going all day. An e commerce warehouse is a similar level of traffic, minus the gross smells.

Here's hoping they have a plan for mixed use residential and not some crappy warehouse though....
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:57 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.