Quote:
Originally Posted by cheswick
In Bowman’s defence the motion was going to pass with or without his vote. Not much he could have done at that stage.
Last poll I’ve heard was from summer 2016 probe online research poll. 53% closed 42% open. Open was 60% amongst 18-34
|
Bowman used it to cut the legs out from under his opponent. Had he maintained his strong support for opening P&M, it still would have ended up on the ballot but it would have connected his campaign to that issue and created the golden issue his opponent needed to say "vote no to P&M and to Bowman".
Now, you can vote no without voting for the non-incumbent. Pretty wise on his part. If Council didnt like Bowman, they should have killed the P&M issue and let the Mayoral race be the defacto vote on P&M
Call me crazy but I have a feeling "Yes" has a chance...(and I thought it was overwhelming "no" initially).