Quote:
Originally Posted by Drybrain
I wonder who the market is for ultra-ultra high-end rentals? I'm a little baffled that someone able to pay nearly $150,000 a year in rent wouldn't just buy a place, and then at least have an asset as well. Perhaps in cities with a lot of globe-trotting super-rich it makes sense, but I don't imagine there's a ton of that in Halifax. (So maybe 12 units is the right number.)
|
At some point, renting becomes a lifestyle choice. You're paying for a service. If someone expects to move in less than say 5 years, doesn't want to deal with maintenance etc. they might choose to rent.
I've seen a lot of threads on a lot of forums go down the endless "rent vs buy" argument with people dug in on both sides. My personal conclusion is that if you're able to look at things objectively (e.g. don't compare a 2 bedroom apartment to a 4 bedroom 3 bath house with a garage), it's financially roughly even. Ownership tends to pull ahead in the longer term bc it functions as a sort of forced savings program, but if a hypothetical renter invested the difference (in the real world most can't or won't) in their lower monthly and up front costs, they should do equally well if not better. There are a lot of lumpy or hidden costs of ownership that people forget about or underplay that are amortized into rent. Obviously all kinds of human factors come into play on both sides, but in the end there's no free lunch. If there truly were a significant discrepancy, market forces should react. So it comes down to personal preference.