HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #141  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 1:30 PM
Hawrylyshyn's Avatar
Hawrylyshyn Hawrylyshyn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,261
I think no one has posted
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #142  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 6:45 PM
lachlanholmes's Avatar
lachlanholmes lachlanholmes is offline
Forever forward.
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 878
Yeah, forum's been activity-dead over the past weekend.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #143  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 7:56 PM
King&James's Avatar
King&James King&James is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by HamiltonForward View Post
Yeah, forum's been activity-dead over the past weekend.
every developer is dust off LRT based development files - bring on the cranes
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #144  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2018, 1:01 PM
hamilton23 hamilton23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by HamiltonBoyInToronto View Post
Is something wrong with the forum ? Or has no one posted anything in days ?
Not much to post in terms of project updates right now. Besides pictures and construction updates of projects, developers were waiting for the Mayoral Campaign to conclude before submitting proposals, etc.

Expect more developments or news on current and new projects in the coming weeks and expect that news to increase more and more afterwards...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #145  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2018, 2:20 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Hotel, student residence and apartments envisioned in latest Vranich project
The development would take up a couple of parcels of land just outside the downtown core

https://www.thespec.com/news-story/9...anich-project/

According to the city, those include a 10-storey hotel with 112 units, a six-storey multiple dwelling with 91 units, and six two-storey townhouses fronting Market Street at the former Mount St. Joseph orphanage at 354 King St. W.

The second proposal — for 200 Market St. and 55 Queen St. N. — includes a 15-storey, mixed-use building with 669 square metres of ground floor commercial space, 141 residential units and seven, two-storey townhouses fronting Market Street.

On Thursday, the city's committee of adjustment — an arm's-length, non-political body — approved minor variances for those two projects so long as the developer meets certain conditions, including conducting a pedestrian-level wind study.

The variances requested included increasing the maximum building height from 22 metres to 36.5 metres and allowing four driveway accesses instead of the maximum one for the King Street site.

At Thursday's meeting, nearby neighbours voiced concerns about the potential issues they worry could stem from this development.

Residents pointed to possible parking issues, traffic congestion, effect on green space and the potential for sunlight and wind impact that could be created by these structures.

Mark Strutt, whose Market Street home abuts the property that currently houses a parking lot, spoke at the committee of adjustment about how he worries this project could block sunlight, cause traffic congestion along a residential stretch of road one block out from the proposed LRT line and affect the structure of his almost 130-year-old home.

"I've got a real concern," he said, adding he would like a chance to speak with neighbours about the project at a community meeting.

Afterwards, Strutt — who has lived in his home for the last 35 years — said he worries about how long construction could take on a project of this magnitude, noting he doesn't believe intensification should come at the expense of longtime neighbourhood residents.

"What we're really trying to do, is we're trying to keep it down to a dull roar," he said. "We don't want to live in an ant farm.

"We want as little impact to Strathcona and the people who live on the periphery."

Representatives for Vranich who spoke at the meeting said they have already submitted a sun and shadow study that meets the city's requirements, and are happy to complete a pedestrian wind study.

Vrancor designer Gunther Blüesz told the committee they will look into the possibility of a green roofs.

Vranich's ultimate vision for the site seems larger than what has been approved by the city so far.

According to Vrancor Group chief financial officer Mlinaric, the lands on the corner of King and Queen will contain a 140-room Hampton Inn and a 1,000-bed student residence.

The hotel is expected to break ground in 2019, he said in an email.

Plans for the second site — bordered by Napier Street, Queen and Market — include four approximately 25-storey apartment buildings containing 200 units each, Mlinaric noted.

No timeline was provided for that portion of the project.

In 2005, Vranich bought the 354 King St. W. property for $2.2 million.

In November 2014, he obtained a demolition permit for the nearly 80-year-old structure and sent in a wrecking crew to demolish the former Mount St. Joseph orphanage on a Saturday in October 2015.

The building was never designated a heritage property and had no legal protection.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #146  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2018, 3:06 PM
King&James's Avatar
King&James King&James is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,321
^^^^ that article could have used a site plan ! Exactly what is to be built and how many storeys? Also classic NIMBY - should have a bingo card of typical coined words and phrases (traffic/shadows/intensification/dull roar) - bonus for using all in one sentence.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #147  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2018, 5:19 PM
johnnyhamont's Avatar
johnnyhamont johnnyhamont is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,115
4 X 25 storeys between Market and Napier sounds amazing!! Bring another 800 units near downtown/ LRT asap please!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #148  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2018, 6:37 PM
LRTfan LRTfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 773
I live in Strathcona and totally disagree with this assertion that "we want as little impact to Strathcona". I want MORE people in Strathcona. I want King and Queen St to resemble King or Queen in Toronto. Not freaking highways that kill our residents and are hostile to business. I want more eyes on the street so the daily parade of drug dealers up and down our streets feel more uncomfortable with actual non-dealers present from time to time.

The periphery of a neighbourhood like this is exactly where intensification can happen. Along King, Queen, York, Main etc.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #149  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2018, 10:08 PM
johnnyhamont's Avatar
johnnyhamont johnnyhamont is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidcappi View Post
not sure how up to date this is, but its pretty much the same as the large printed render they have hanging up in their office.

The render the Spec printed today shows much more height. This image is from this page which lists it as the most recent render!


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #150  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2018, 11:28 PM
LRTfan LRTfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 773
Taller the better right at King/Queen
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #151  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2018, 3:02 AM
LRTfan LRTfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 773
24-storeys there makes sense in light of 24-storeys coming right across the road.

The Spec article makes it sound like this is in Westdale. Queen is the 1st stop on the future LRT line after King/MacNab.... this is right downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #152  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2018, 3:13 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,397
Spec-sized pic:

Source

This proposal will get more heat from local homeowners, but it's absolutely the kind of evolution in intensification LRT will help catalyze in the core, the kind that should be hoped for to increase the tax base on existing urban land. It's appropriate here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #153  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2018, 3:28 AM
LRTfan LRTfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
Spec-sized pic:

Source

This proposal will get more heat from local homeowners, but it's absolutely the kind of evolution in intensification LRT will help catalyze in the core, the kind that should be hoped for to increase the tax base on existing urban land. It's appropriate here.

Agreed...and I'm not sure which homeowners can object? This entire corner is empty. They are planning 2 storey modern towns on both sides of Market St which I love. Then taller height close to King and along Queen. It's exactly as this sort of development should be planned. You have to get almost to Ray St before there are any homes. It's just massive empty lots along here right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #154  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2018, 4:06 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,733
This project really needs to work on the street level experience. I hope residents don't get too focused on the height - as proposed it looks like it will be outright hostile to pedestrians.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #155  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2018, 1:34 PM
davidcappi's Avatar
davidcappi davidcappi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,992
That article makes zero sense. I'm not sure where the 4x25 storey towers is coming from because based on the november 1 application which is discussed in that article, the lot bounded by Queen, Market and Napier is supposed to contain the 15 storey residential building. Either this is in error, outdated info or the application for the 15 storey building is only temporary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #156  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2018, 1:37 PM
StEC's Avatar
StEC StEC is offline
Burger Connoisseur
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
This project really needs to work on the street level experience. I hope residents don't get too focused on the height - as proposed it looks like it will be outright hostile to pedestrians.
Agreed, the height is ideal here. The street level though is atrocious for this area. Little shops should adorn that corner and along the King St frontage. Maybe the sidewalks should be a bit wider as well to accommodate small patios! That should be the focus make this excellent development welcoming and friendly to pedestrians!
__________________
Living in and loving Hamilton since Jan. 2014!
Follow me on Instagram & Threads where I feature the beauty of Hamilton, Niagara & Toronto!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #157  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2018, 4:26 PM
johnnyhamont's Avatar
johnnyhamont johnnyhamont is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,115
Curious that the render seems to portray King St with no LRT but with 2-way traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #158  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2018, 8:55 PM
lachlanholmes's Avatar
lachlanholmes lachlanholmes is offline
Forever forward.
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyhamont View Post
Curious that the render seems to portray King St with no LRT but with 2-way traffic.
They have not tried very hard with the render. For one, on one side of the street they show the Locke St. intersection with Rolly Rockets, which is blocks away from the project, and the whole street has been flipped with the grand lodge building that is actually on the south side being shown on the north side.

Pay no mind to the useless rendering, IMO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #159  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2018, 1:22 PM
King&James's Avatar
King&James King&James is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,321
Hence my earlier comment on need for a site plan!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #160  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2018, 6:07 PM
davidcappi's Avatar
davidcappi davidcappi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,992
Apologies for the quality. It's the best that is available at this time. I've kept the shots larger so you can get as much info as possible.

For the block bounded by Queen, King, and Market, we can see the hotel and residential building:



For the block bounded by Queen, Market and Napier, we can see they're proposing a large podium with commercial, residential and townhouses, with the 15 storey building located directly in the middle of the block.



They didn't submit anything that suggests 4 25 storey towers unless Vrancor has purchased the homes/businesses along Ray St. I'm not sure where the Spec got that info, but it must be a really old quote because it doesn't reflect what they applied for. Combined with the posting of a really, really inaccurate render, it's not surprising people are so opposed to development. The info they receive is not at all correct. According to the render they posted in the article, there would be a 24 storey tower emerging literally out of the top of the proposed 6 storey building fronting King. It's also worth noting the architect on the plans is listed as SRM. I think Saplys is designing the Hotel with SRM designing the rest of the buildings.

Hopefully some better quality images/plans come available online soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.