HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #141  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2009, 7:48 PM
Cre47's Avatar
Cre47 Cre47 is offline
Awesome!
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orleans, ON
Posts: 1,971
I don't know why the new A-50 section was designed as a Super-2 it's obvious it is as or if not as dangerous as the 100-series highways. Here's another proof that all of A-50 should be at least 4 lanes, not a Super-2 in parts

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Th...413/story.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #142  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2009, 8:26 PM
Kitchissippi's Avatar
Kitchissippi Kitchissippi is offline
Busy Beaver
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,611
The problem with a lot of secondary highways in Quebec and Ontario is that they are substandard. They are narrow with zero shoulders, meaning most drivers try and stick to the middle to avoid slipping off the edge.

I would love to see a moratorium on all four-laning until all the secondary highways are upgraded to a safer standard. Paved shoulders (1.5 to 2 metres) increase the margin of error for drivers, make roads safer for cyclists and actually make the roadbed last longer because of less edge erosion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #143  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2009, 5:43 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,252
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #144  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2009, 8:06 PM
TransitZilla TransitZilla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,784
Haven't seen this posted yet...

Display boards from Strandherd Bridge Information Session
http://ottawa.ca/residents/major_pro...ession_en.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #145  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2009, 5:37 AM
Deez's Avatar
Deez Deez is offline
you know my steez
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto/Ottawa
Posts: 1,397
I'm thinking that the above-deck arches make a better visual statement. While crossing a below-deck arch bridge would basically be the same experience as crossing a highway overpass, the above-deck arch options really make you realize you're crossing a waterway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #146  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2009, 11:41 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,252
those PoW display boards are up now
http://www.ottawa.ca/residents/publi...boards_en.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #147  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2009, 9:32 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,252
Quote:
Strandherd Drive Extension – Crestway Drive to Prince of Wales Drive
Including adjacent works on Prince of Wales Drive Detailed Design


The Construction Services Development Division has initiated a Detailed Design assignment to extend Strandherd Drive between Crestway Drive and Prince of Wales Drive. This project received environmental clearance through the completion of an Environmental Study Report in 1993 (Rideau River Bridge, Location Feasibility Study, Strandherd Drive/Armstrong Road, January 1993 and an ESR Addendum November 1997). The initial phases of Strandherd Drive construction between Greenbank Road and Crestway Drive were completed in 2000 and 2007.

The current assignment will provide the City with tender documents by June 2009, permitting tendering and construction to proceed in Summer 2009.
Within the noted limits, the following requirements have been identified:
  • Extend Strandherd Drive between Crestway Drive and Prince of Wales Drive as a 4-lane divided arterial, including bus lanes.
  • Modifications to Prince of Wales Drive north and south of the Strandherd Drive/Prince of Wales Drive Intersection, extending on the south to Woodroffe Avenue.
  • Provision of a new traffic control signal system and street lighting system on Strandherd Drive and Prince of Wales Drive.
  • Development of a landscape plan related to the new road construction.
  • Inclusion of cycling lanes related to the new road construction.
  • Closure of Woodroffe Avenue at Prince of Wales Drive, once Strandherd Drive is extended to Prince of Wales Drive.


You are invited:
Thursday, April 2, 2009
5:00 to 7:30 pm
Upper Concourse
Walter Baker Centre
100 Malvern Drive

The purpose of this Open House is to present the detailed design and landscape plan developed by the project team.
For more information and/or to submit comments, please contact:
Carolyn Newcombe, P.Eng.
Senior Infrastructure Engineer
Construction Services Development
City of Ottawa
6th Floor, 100 Constellation Crescent
Ottawa, Ontario, K2G 6J8
Phone: (613) 580-2424 ext. 28230
Fax: (613) 560-6064

Comments on this Open House should be submitted by Thursday, April 16, 2009.
Prepared by the Department of Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability.

http://ottawa.ca/residents/public_co...d/oh_4_en.html
are those bus lanes going in the NS LRT ROW?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #148  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2009, 6:34 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,252
http://www.ottawabusinessjournal.com...1822589499.php

Hunt Club extension stalls
By Ottawa Business Journal Staff
Tue, Mar 10, 2009 2:00 PM EST


Innes Ward Coun. Rainer Bloess (file photo)
Work on the proposed Hunt Club Extension may not get rolling for a while yet, as questions continue about what funding roles the municipal and provincial governments should play.

The roadwork project came to the forefront again last month, when inquiries from Innes Coun. Rainer Bloess and Cumberland Coun. Rob Jellett in a corporate services and economic development committee meeting prompted city staff to explain it "was not on the current list" because the city had been unable to secure provincial funds for design work and could not qualify due to requirements that substantial work be completed by 2010.

The issue arose, recounts Coun. Bloess, when committee turned to the topic of submitting projects for infrastructure funding. Though the city had already dedicated a portion of funding for the extension's design work – $2 million of the $4 million required – it was subject to other levels of government following through with financial support as well, he explains.

"It can't all be done because there's not enough money for it," Coun. Bloess adds.

Without the initiative being "shovel-ready," it can't qualify for the infrastructure cash, he continues.

"The province always indicated ... they were prepared to come on board" since the roadwork would connect with Highway 417, Coun. Bloess says; the Ontario government was just waiting for the city's lead to move forward with the project. "They said it a few times in the past. The commitment had always been there."

Coun. Bloess explains councillors are currently awaiting a meeting with Ottawa-Orleans MPP Phil McNeely to determine the project's status. Trying to get the Hunt Club Extension – a part of the city's transportation master plan and a definite municipal priority – into a city budget as soon as possible is the aim, he adds.

But Mr. McNeely says the province "has not received any official requests for funding" in regards to the Hunt Club Extension, adding that the city needs to sit down with the provincial government to devise a cost-sharing plan.

"It's going to help commuters a lot, but also the (Ministry of Transportation)," he continues, pointing to the benefits for both levels of government. "We've always been pushing the project."

The previously completed environment assessment for the roadwork was undertaken with one-third of funding from the province and the rest from the city, Mr. McNeely recounts, noting the city-driven study took four years to complete.

He adds the extension has also been pushed back in the municipal transportation master plan, but was quickly passed by the provincial environment minister.

"We have not held this up at all," Mr. McNeely says.

As a primarily municipal project, the city should move ahead with design work in order to prepare as quickly as possible for when provincial financing becomes available, he suggests.

As for the next provincial budget, "we may not have the resources there," Mr. McNeely says. "(But) it's certainly high on my priorities."

WHAT IS THE PROPOSED HUNT CLUB EXTENSION?

The Innes-Walkley-Hunt Club connection would see an arterial road extend east from Hunt Club Road beyond Highway 417, then travel north to connect to Walkley Road before continuing on to Innes Road just west of the Ottawa-Carleton Detention Centre. Plans also include an interchange at Hunt Club and Highway 417

By Laura Cummings

Special to the OBJ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #149  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2009, 12:14 AM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
Haha the City can't even get itself organized for one of the few useful road projects around (Hunt Club to 417 - beyond that I don't see the point, especially since completing to the 417 will relieve most of the pressure on Hawthorne Rd).
__________________
Ottawa's quasi-official motto: "It can't be done"
Ottawa's quasi-official ethos: "We have a process to follow"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #150  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2009, 8:29 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,252
Walkley Road – Proposed Roadway Modifications
Pursuant to by-law 2002-522, the City of Ottawa is providing notice to the public of its intention to approve roadway modifications at the following locations in accordance with By-Law 2001-12.

Walkley Road and Russell Road/Hawthorne Road
Addition of second southbound left-turn lane

Walkley Road and Lancaster Road
Addition of second southbound left-turn lane and extension of existing southbound right-turn lane

Walkley Road and Sheffield Road
Addition of second southbound left-turn lane and extension of existing eastbound
left-turn lane

Walkley Road between Russell Road/Hawthorne Road and Lancaster Road
Relocation/modification to existing centre median

For more information, please contact:
Ann Selfe, P.Eng.
Planning and Growth Management Branch
Mobility and Area Traffic Management Division
Tel.: 613-580-2424, ext. 13185
E-mail: [email protected]
Any person who wishes to raise objections to these changes must contact the City Clerk, in writing at the address below by Friday, March 20, 2009.
City Clerk,
110 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa Ontario K1P 1J1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #151  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2009, 4:23 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,445
Has anyone besides me connected the two preceding posts?

If the Hunt Club Road was extended to the 417, then I think a huge portion of the traffic would not need to turn south from Walkley.

Let's use the money from the Walkley Road modifications to complete the design of the Hunt Club Extension so that it could be funded by the upper levels of government.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #152  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2009, 11:43 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 25,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Eade View Post
...

If the Hunt Club Road was extended to the 417,
If Hunt Club Road were extended to the 417 - construction and development in Ottawa demands the subjunctive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #153  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2009, 1:39 PM
Cre47's Avatar
Cre47 Cre47 is offline
Awesome!
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orleans, ON
Posts: 1,971
IMO, there are too much lanes for regular vehicules though. Four lanes for them would have being good enough. At least there will be a transit lane and a cyclist lane.

Quote:
Thu, April 2, 2009
Gap finally bridged
Riverside South-Barrhaven link over river gets city approval

An artist's rendition of a bridge over the Rideau River which will connect Riverside South with Barrhaven.

Riverside South residents will soon have a bridge to somewhere.

After years of waiting for a link to South Nepean over the Rideau River, the city has made its decision on the final design of the Strandherd-Armstrong bridge, which will connect Riverside South with Barrhaven and provide the much-needed "missing link" to the city's south-end transit system.

The city has approved an above-deck triple-arch-style bridge that will "act as a gateway to the nation's capital," according to a city document obtained by the Sun.

The chosen design, for which there is $48 million (in 2007 dollars) budgeted, scored higher in the list of criteria than a below-deck arch-frame bridge design that was also in the running.

10-LANES WIDE


Click here to find out more!

The bridge will connect with Prince of Wales Dr. on the north side of the Rideau River just west of the Chapman Mills Conservation Area and with Earl Armstrong Rd. on the south side just west of Riverside South.

The proposed bridge scored high for its cost, ease of construction, and pedestrian-friendly design, which blends in with the heritage of the river.

The bridge will have 10 lanes to accommodate traffic -- five for each direction, including three lanes for car and truck traffic, one for transit and a lane for cyclists.

Pedestrian sidewalks are also included in the plans and will be located on the outside east and west sections of the bridge.

"I think this will be an important gateway into the City of Ottawa," said Gloucester-South Nepean Coun. Steve Desroches, who represents about 4,000 residents living in Riverside South.

The document says the tender for the bridge will go out for bid next February. Construction is expected to begin later in the year or in 2011.

100-YEAR LIFE CYCLE

To keep costs down over the life of the bridge, the city says it's important to keep the structure "light," but the materials will be "high quality durable materials to minimize 100-year life-cycle cost."

Desroches said the bridge will help move along plans to bring light-rail transit to his community and will connect with park-and-ride lots planned for the area.

"This bridge is the missing link for improving transit and critical in connecting the two communities (Barrhaven and Riverside South)," he said.

The bridge will also relieve traffic on the Hunt Club bridge and the bridge in nearby Manotick, Desroches said. It will also help police, paramedics and firefighters respond to calls in the city's south end.

There is a public meeting today from 5-7 p.m. at the Walter Baker Centre in Barrhaven to discuss plans to extend Strandherd Dr. to Prince of Wales Dr., where the bridge will connect in South Nepean.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #154  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2009, 1:41 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,445
Looks like the City has chosen the over-deck, 'space-frame' arch bridge for the new Strandherd-Armstrong Bridge.
http://www.ottawasun.com/News/Ottawa...73576-sun.html

It will be interesting to see the actual cost of this bridge. From the article, there is $48M budgeted for the bridge, but the cost of $105M has been thrown around for quite some time. The higher cost does include all of the peripheral work required to attatch the bridge to the roads so that might be the difference.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #155  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2009, 1:51 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cre47 View Post
IMO, there are too much lanes for regular vehicules though. Four lanes for them would have being good enough. At least there will be a transit lane and a cyclist lane.
Jim Durrell was on the radio this morning and was inclined to agree with you when the Hunt Club Road Bridge was being planned. He is now happy that he did not make that mistake when he eventually agreed to the wider bridge that ended up being built. Bridges are critical connections and are expensive to build. It is very important not to underconfigure them else we will be looking at another $100M bridge in 10 years. We just have to remember that the Hunt Club Bridge opened in 1985 and it didn't take that long before it ended up being congested.

Building a wide bridge is especially important when considering that rapid transit in the south end has been indefinitely delayed.

I do hope that the transit lanes are being designed to be LRT compatible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #156  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2009, 1:57 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
I agree that 4 lanes is probably sufficient for that bridge now, although I can understand the thought of the future potential knowing the Hunt Club bridge is too congested. Land should be protected for LRT/BRT, although I don't see a need to build it yet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #157  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2009, 2:37 PM
Cre47's Avatar
Cre47 Cre47 is offline
Awesome!
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orleans, ON
Posts: 1,971
Though in the TMP's there seems to be plans for another bridge anyways from Fallowfield Road to River Road although at least 10 years from now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #158  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2009, 3:44 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,445
The S-A Bridge is 'effectively' 10-lanes wide, or about 40 metres, but there are not 10 lanes of road traffic room. There are three arches which take up room. There is an arch in the middle plus one on each side, between the bicycle lanes and the pedestrian lanes. Interestingly, the pedestrian lanes are to be bowed out.



In the above illustration, the bowed pedestrian lanes are in fuchia, the bike lanes are in yellow, and the blue lines are the bus lanes. What is being called three traffic lanes is actually only two lanes for general, through traffic, plus a left-turn lane. Apparently it was considered a mistake to not have extended the left-turn lanes across the Hunt Club Bridge; a mistake that was not to be repeated with this bridge.

For the record, it is already planned that a new transit-only bridge will be built 20 metres south of the S-A Bridge within 20 years. The transit lanes of the S-A Bridge will be released to general traffic. (So I guess there will ultimately be three through lanes for general traffic.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #159  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2009, 8:37 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,252
Why not combine pedestrian sidewalks and bike lanes (making them slightly wider and perhaps painting lines to separate them)... who wants to bike beside 4 lanes of traffic?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #160  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2009, 8:45 PM
TransitZilla TransitZilla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
Why not combine pedestrian sidewalks and bike lanes (making them slightly wider and perhaps painting lines to separate them)... who wants to bike beside 4 lanes of traffic?
No thanks.

As a commuter cyclist, I'd much rather there be a cycling lane. Cyclists going 30-40 km/h and pedestrians stolling along astride the entire sidewalk do NOT mix.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.