HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #15781  
Old Posted May 18, 2021, 12:52 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28,700
But I thought frequency has no impact on ridership... Though Brampton (and a lot of the 905) is still ridiculous with their 30 min headways.

I find it funny the lengths people will go, to justify the mediocrity in their hood, out of some misplaced sense of civic pride or honour. If something is shit in my town, I call it out.
     
     
  #15782  
Old Posted May 18, 2021, 3:19 PM
Doady Doady is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,166
Brampton and Mississauga provide far superior service to York Region Transit now, but all that service came after. In 2006, YRT's VIVA system with it's coverage and 10-15 minute frequencies all day was far superior to anything those other systems had at the time. But VIVA failed to address the basic problems of YRT: the lack of a continuous east-west corridor south of 16th/Rutherford, and the fact that most residents in York work outside of the Region (around 40% compared to 20% in Mississauga, something like that). Adding a Steeles route and some sort of fare integration with TTC would have helped with both of those problems (Brampton Transit has fare integration with Mississauga).

Multiple corridors in York Region are broken, such as Langstaff, and their biggest mistake was not building any new ones. Compare that Brampton which built Sandalwood Parkway and Williams Parkway, and Mississauga which built Glen Erin, Rathburn and Confederation. And even as lacking in corridors as York Region is, they don't even bother to provide bus service along one of their few east-west corridors, their main east-west corridor, Steeles Ave. York Region Transit can upgrade all of their routes to 5 minutes, but it won't change the fact that it's an incomplete transit system, and that's the real reason for their poor ridership.

You come in here and attack everyone and label everyone as "living in their mom's basement" who have "never experienced anything", I provide you with real world experience and evidence and you just completely ignore it and laugh it off and continue to double down on the idea that 10 minute frequency instead of 5 minute frequency is "a recipe for low transit usage", that an average 2.5 minute difference in waiting time is the difference between people driving and getting people out of car, as if low transit ridership is the reason for Waterloo's LRT to begin with. You are the one is making the wild claims here, and you are the one here who continues to fail to provide any real world experience or examples or evidence for any of them, not me.

It's funny, I have spent so much time to make negative photo threads like Orlando Corporation's Heartland Business Community and Mississauga: The 24-Hour City all centered on Mississauga, and while they get some appreciation on SSP, they got completely ignored on Urban Toronto. But the moment I dared to put Mississauga's transit system on the same level as Brampton Transit, suddenly everything I have done is labelled by people at Urban Toronto as "incessant boosterism". But now, even here, highlighting and bringing to everyone's attention the terrible frequency of a major Mississauga bus route to defend the LRT in Waterloo is labelled as a "misplaced sense of civic pride or honour". I'm just showing things as they are, and I will continue to do that no matter how much people think it is "incessant boosterism" and a "misplaced sense of civic pride or honour".
     
     
  #15783  
Old Posted May 18, 2021, 3:32 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doady View Post
You come in here and attack everyone and label everyone as "living in their mom's basement"
Don't think I ever said this....

I have, however, said this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doady View Post
...who have "never experienced anything",
Mostly because I find it hard to believe that people can travel all over the world, and then come back to their McMansion paradise and vociferously defend 30 min bus service as somehow acceptable.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Doady View Post
I provide you with real world experience and evidence and you just completely ignore it and laugh it off and continue to double down on the idea that 10 minute frequency instead of 5 minute frequency is "a recipe for low transit usage", that an average 2.5 minute difference in waiting time is the difference between people driving and getting people out of car, as if low transit ridership is the reason for Waterloo's LRT to begin with.
I stand by what I said. A "rapid transit" system that has the same frequency as most suburban buses in the 416 (at peak no less) isn't going to motivate people to ditch their cars. Yeah, it's manageable for those with no choice. Kinda like those who put up with a bus every 30 min.

Compare mode share between any city in Canada. Let me know when you find one with low frequency that has substantial transit mode share. There's a reason why you see three cars in every McMansion driveway in Mississauga.
     
     
  #15784  
Old Posted May 18, 2021, 3:33 PM
Tg11 Tg11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 373
Can't wait until LRT is unveiled
     
     
  #15785  
Old Posted May 18, 2021, 10:04 PM
Doady Doady is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Don't think I ever said this....

I have, however, said this:
Sorry, I confused you with the other guy. My bad.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Mostly because I find it hard to believe that people can travel all over the world, and then come back to their McMansion paradise and vociferously defend 30 min bus service as somehow acceptable.
Wasn't your whole point about 10 minutes frequencies not being enough to attract car users to transit? So why would "McMansions" disqualify a place as a counterexample? Why would high transit ridership in places with lots of cars like Brampton and Mississauga be disqualified as examples how to get car users onto transit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
I stand by what I said. A "rapid transit" system that has the same frequency as most suburban buses in the 416 (at peak no less) isn't going to motivate people to ditch their cars. Yeah, it's manageable for those with no choice. Kinda like those who put up with a bus every 30 min.

Compare mode share between any city in Canada. Let me know when you find one with low frequency that has substantial transit mode share. There's a reason why you see three cars in every McMansion driveway in Mississauga.
Main Mode of Commuting, Public Transit, 2016

Toronto 37.0%
Montreal 36.5%
Vancouver 29.7%
Ottawa 20.1%
Mississauga 18.1%
Calgary 15.8%
Winnipeg 14.9%
Edmonton 14.6%
Quebec 14.5%
Brampton 14.0%
Hamilton 10.6%

Mississauga is one of the leaders in Canada in transit mode share. And of course the transit system has the high frequencies to match that high mode share. The question is whether that those high frequencies came first, and I gave an example of one route that shows how it has been the ridership that came first, the service struggling to keep up.

You can see that all over Canada, buses and trains overcrowded, systems trying to catch up and match the demand. Systems struggling to alleviate overcrowding don't have the resources to run lots of empty buses and trains in the hope that ridership will materialize one day. And those that don't have the ridership also don't have the fare revenue to pay for such a huge amount of service like 5 minutes headways on every route. The only system in Canada I know that tried something like that was York Region Transit, and they failed. "Build it and they will come" didn't work for YRT, and it didn't work for many systems all over the US either.

It is hard to find examples of systems that received huge subsidies to run empty buses at 5 minute frequencies, let alone any evidence such high frequencies resulted in massive ridership increase. For example, the TTC had a farebox cost recovery ratio of 109% in 1960, and 98% in 1970, and they have maintained around 80% cost recovery to the present day. At no point did the TTC increase service levels of bus routes in those new subdivisions beyond the bare minimum needed to fulfill demand. The high frequencies of the TTC are the result of high ridership, high fare revenue, not the other way around.
     
     
  #15786  
Old Posted May 20, 2021, 9:24 PM
Nite's Avatar
Nite Nite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,353
Eglinton Crosstown - Eglinton-Yonge Station
Video Link



Eglinton Crosstown - Science-Centre Station
Video Link
     
     
  #15787  
Old Posted May 27, 2021, 7:17 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,320
Calgary celebrated 40 years of CTrain service on May 25th.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/lrt-anniversary-ctrain-calgary-40-years-1.6039523
     
     
  #15788  
Old Posted May 27, 2021, 10:18 PM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,875
The CTrain really is an exceptionally good service and system. It is the posterchild of how wealthy and car-centric cities can still support an excellent transit system.

Congratulations Calgary!
     
     
  #15789  
Old Posted May 31, 2021, 7:41 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,320
Open payment continues to be rolled out in Ottawa. All operational O-Train Stations now have it available on one fare gate at each entrance to the fare-paid zone.

All fare gates should be equipped by the end of 2021. Open payment should also be rolled-out by the end of the year.
     
     
  #15790  
Old Posted May 31, 2021, 6:01 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is online now
Pass me the Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 50,755
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
     
     
  #15791  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2021, 10:41 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,320
Off chance anyone may be interested.

Quote:
STO
@STOGatineau


Participez à la 1ière d’une série de 3 rencontres publiques virtuelles «UN TRAMWAY DANS MA VILLE» pour en apprendre davantage sur le système de transport collectif structurant de l’ouest de Gatineau. Détails et inscriptions au http://sto.ca/tramwaygatineau


10:20 AM · May 19, 2021·Hootsuite Inc.
https://twitter.com/STOGatineau/status/1395021451040808970
     
     
  #15792  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2021, 8:52 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
Urbantoronto.ca gets more and more extreme. It wouldn't surprise me if the majority would approve banning cars althogether from the Don River to Bathurst south of Bloor. They also view building a residential subdivision comprising 40 storey towers next to a 905 GO Station (usually in industrial, no mans land ) as progress because it doesn't compute that these communities have real neighbourhoods with things to do for work and play. An expensive commuter rail line into the city is not practical a means for everyday transportation. The definition of TOD is being stretched so thin it almost lost its meaning. I'm saddened so much development potential is now being directed at these subpar, masterplanned, super blocks
     
     
  #15793  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2021, 8:55 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
It wouldn't surprise me if the majority would approve banning cars althogether from the Don River to Bathurst south of Bloor.
I mean...

Eglinton Line was being tested with rolling stock today, as an aside.
     
     
  #15794  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2021, 7:05 PM
Mr. Blue Mr. Blue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Toronto
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Urbantoronto.ca gets more and more extreme. It wouldn't surprise me if the majority would approve banning cars althogether from the Don River to Bathurst south of Bloor. They also view building a residential subdivision comprising 40 storey towers next to a 905 GO Station (usually in industrial, no mans land ) as progress because it doesn't compute that these communities have real neighbourhoods with things to do for work and play. An expensive commuter rail line into the city is not practical a means for everyday transportation. The definition of TOD is being stretched so thin it almost lost its meaning. I'm saddened so much development potential is now being directed at these subpar, masterplanned, super blocks
I completely disagree. You say an expensive commuter rail line into the city is not practical as a means for everyday transportation. So let's make it practical damn it. Turning our 9-5 commuter rail system into frequent all-day regional rail makes a ton of sense for this region and that's being achieved with the GO RER/Expansion plans. Head to Paris or any European city with regional rail and you will not find gigantic parking lots or garages near stations.
     
     
  #15795  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2021, 7:56 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Urbantoronto.ca gets more and more extreme. It wouldn't surprise me if the majority would approve banning cars althogether from the Don River to Bathurst south of Bloor. They also view building a residential subdivision comprising 40 storey towers next to a 905 GO Station (usually in industrial, no mans land ) as progress because it doesn't compute that these communities have real neighbourhoods with things to do for work and play. An expensive commuter rail line into the city is not practical a means for everyday transportation. The definition of TOD is being stretched so thin it almost lost its meaning. I'm saddened so much development potential is now being directed at these subpar, masterplanned, super blocks
So I’m not the only one that feels that way. It’s becoming an echo chamber because these people are suggesting things that are outright laughable. I’m like, “*BEEP*, man, you guys are the reason that I wanna move to the exurb and get a reasonably sized house for myself.”
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
     
     
  #15796  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2021, 1:54 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
So I’m not the only one that feels that way. It’s becoming an echo chamber because these people are suggesting things that are outright laughable. I’m like, “*BEEP*, man, you guys are the reason that I wanna move to the exurb and get a reasonably sized house for myself.”
UT is very much a Toronto centric echo chamber. Event he ONR thread gets into the feeling that unless it serves Toronto, it is useless.
     
     
  #15797  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2021, 3:07 AM
GeneralLea's Avatar
GeneralLea GeneralLea is offline
Midtowner since 2K
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Midtown Toronto
Posts: 5,952
That's my biggest problem with UT. Something just seems to....off about everyone there. Not all the time, but often enough...it's what convinced me to not visit the site for years. I still find it a bore to read some of the discussion they have.

Anyways, it's good to see a continued investment in GTA rail construction by the government...and a continued investment across the coutnry for that matter.
__________________
"Living life on the edge"
     
     
  #15798  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2021, 3:19 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
I just saw this: https://www.google.ca/amp/s/ici.radio-ca...nclusion-financement-federal-12-mai-2021.
Pretty interesting I must say.
Any chance that the rail track along Rapidbus will be incorporated in the long term? After some brainstorming with @le_calmar I figured STO can convert it like how OC Transpo did.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
     
     
  #15799  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2021, 8:22 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
I just saw this: https://www.google.ca/amp/s/ici.radio-ca...nclusion-financement-federal-12-mai-2021.
Pretty interesting I must say.
Any chance that the rail track along Rapidbus will be incorporated in the long term? After some brainstorming with @le_calmar I figured STO can convert it like how OC Transpo did.
Converting the RapiBus to light-rail is in the cards. It would be a straight-up conversion of the busway, similar to what was done/is ongoing in Ottawa. That's one of the reasons many of us support the downtown loop concept, which would create more capacity to plug-in the converted RapiBus when the time comes.

No timeline for the RapiBus conversion. Possibly 15-20 years.

There are no official plans for the tracks running parallel to the bus corridor. I believe it's still being used for freight, but on very rare occasions if so. There have been plans for tourist trains and such, but nothing came of it. There is one private group in the Ottawa-Gatineau region called Moose that have been promoting a commuter rail project for about a decade. They've made some outrageous claims about the feasibility of their project over the years, but nothing has come of it other than grievances against the City of Ottawa's plans for the Prince of Wales Bridge and its connection to Bayview Station.
     
     
  #15800  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2021, 8:48 AM
biguc's Avatar
biguc biguc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pinkoland
Posts: 11,835
Looks like there's a clear case to connect Trillium to that RapiBus conversion.

RapiBus, by the way, is not a great name.
__________________
no
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:09 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.