HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1561  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 4:44 PM
djforsberg's Avatar
djforsberg djforsberg is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 2,959
Regina Bypass traffic only about a quarter of the expected daily volume

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saska...5600-1.5383749

What an absolute waste of taxpayers money.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1562  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 4:50 PM
UPP UPP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Regina, Canada
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by djforsberg View Post
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saska...5600-1.5383749

What an absolute waste of taxpayers money.
And that number is probably inflated by the amount of people just trying it out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1563  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 5:03 PM
jigglysquishy's Avatar
jigglysquishy jigglysquishy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,326
I told you so.

I've never been more right about something.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1564  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 5:04 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Now people are definitely going to question the need of an outer ring for Saskatoon...
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1565  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 5:18 PM
djforsberg's Avatar
djforsberg djforsberg is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Now people are definitely going to question the need of an outer ring for Saskatoon...
There were reports recently showing that far less people used the new north "commuter" bridge than was originally estimated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1566  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 5:25 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
On the other hand, we can probably wait till next year to get a full picture. The bypass was opened in late fall/early winter. That could also be a contributing factor to the low volume.*

* Correct me if I'm wrong.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1567  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 6:26 PM
djforsberg's Avatar
djforsberg djforsberg is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
On the other hand, we can probably wait till next year to get a full picture. The bypass was opened in late fall/early winter. That could also be a contributing factor to the low volume.*

* Correct me if I'm wrong.
Not sure where those vehicles are going to magically appear from.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1568  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 6:55 PM
StealthGirl's Avatar
StealthGirl StealthGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,230
Is the bypass appearing on GPS maps? I know in our vehicle the bypass is not yet showing although we have driven on the bypass. Maybe the next update will affect that?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1569  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 7:01 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthGirl View Post
Is the bypass appearing on GPS maps? I know in our vehicle the bypass is not yet showing although we have driven on the bypass. Maybe the next update will affect that?
Sometimes I can't help but wonder if big companies like Google simply don't care about the Prairies lol. We had to report a missing road to get the new stretch of the bypass onto Google Maps.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1570  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 7:55 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Sometimes I can't help but wonder if big companies like Google simply don't care about the Prairies lol. We had to report a missing road to get the new stretch of the bypass onto Google Maps.
Google maps is now giving directions on the new Bypass and is also showing traffic conditions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1571  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 8:02 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Google maps is now giving directions on the new Bypass and is also showing traffic conditions.
That I know, but it took them a few days. On the other hand, in P.E.I., when their Cornwall Bypass was completed, Google Map showed it right away. That bugs me.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1572  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 8:40 PM
ericmacm's Avatar
ericmacm ericmacm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 768
Highways are a long term investment. It's going to take more than a month of being open for the bypass to get into full swing. I reckon by next year it'll probably hit the expected usage levels and exceed it later. If we judged every infrastructure project by its first month of performance, we wouldn't build anything at all.

Give it time and it will be used.
__________________
Opinions expressed here are solely my own and do not represent those of my employer.

Come See My Work: Mississauga Future Skyline Model | Pan-Canadian Future Skylines Project - Kelowna, Saskatoon, Windsor, London, Hamilton, Niagara Falls, Barrie, Ottawa, Halifax​​​ | Astrophotography Thread
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1573  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 9:22 PM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericmacm View Post
Highways are a long term investment. It's going to take more than a month of being open for the bypass to get into full swing. I reckon by next year it'll probably hit the expected usage levels and exceed it later. If we judged every infrastructure project by its first month of performance, we wouldn't build anything at all.

Give it time and it will be used.
Is the road even fully open and properly signed yet? The people declaring it a huge failure after one month are the same people who have crapped all over it since it was first announced. Once the road is fully functional the numbers will go up. I just had a look at traffic volumes for various points along the 201 around Calgary from 2009 to 2018. At first the volumes were very low but it didn't take long for them to grow. Now I believe every point is well above what the province was forecasting. As stuff gets built along the bypass traffic volumes will rise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1574  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 9:24 PM
djforsberg's Avatar
djforsberg djforsberg is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericmacm View Post
Highways are a long term investment. It's going to take more than a month of being open for the bypass to get into full swing. I reckon by next year it'll probably hit the expected usage levels and exceed it later. If we judged every infrastructure project by its first month of performance, we wouldn't build anything at all.

Give it time and it will be used.
I guess you've never been to Regina, city of 250k people and two ring roads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1575  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 9:29 PM
djforsberg's Avatar
djforsberg djforsberg is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
Is the road even fully open and properly signed yet? The people declaring it a huge failure after one month are the same people who have crapped all over it since it was first announced. Once the road is fully functional the numbers will go up. I just had a look at traffic volumes for various points along the 201 around Calgary from 2009 to 2018. At first the volumes were very low but it didn't take long for them to grow. Now I believe every point is well above what the province was forecasting. As stuff gets built along the bypass traffic volumes will rise.
I was a supporter of it back when the GTH was supposed to be a big thing. The best predictor of the future is the past and this bypass will never be fully utilized in the coming decades, just like the GTH wasn't in its first and likely, subsequent decades.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1576  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 9:30 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by djforsberg View Post
I guess you've never been to Regina, city of 250k people and two ring roads.
Three points that I wanna make:
(1) It was a mistake to build up (and out) Victoria Avenue: We could have completely grade-separated it from RR to Balgonie and put a partial system interchange at RR;
(2) Even then, I’ve heard that RR can get stressed during rush hour;
(3) Most importantly, we are talking about the Trans-Canada Highway here, not just your back country road, but cross-country highway: It’s somewhat important to keep it free-flowing. Bref, at least SK didn’t repeat the mistakes of MB (aka putting traffic lights). *cough cough*
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1577  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 9:31 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,975
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthGirl View Post
Is the bypass appearing on GPS maps? I know in our vehicle the bypass is not yet showing although we have driven on the bypass. Maybe the next update will affect that?
It will not appear in your vehicle until you do an update of your maps. Which depending on your vehicle and it's age may be costly. Or, very easy for vehicles that have wifi connectivity..

Again, I'm not sure what vehicle you have. Newer vehicles allow you to use an app from your mobile that connects with your vehicle display. Such as google maps. In this case there would be no need to update.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1578  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 9:40 PM
jigglysquishy's Avatar
jigglysquishy jigglysquishy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,326
For reference, that number was their expected 2019 numbers. The report (which was taken down off their website) lists expected traffic volumes as

Q4 2019: 21,000
Q4 2020: 32,000
Q4 2021: 35,000

I can't find any data beyond that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1579  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 9:53 PM
city rep city rep is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Regina
Posts: 16
Google maps is missing key interchanges like south HWY6 still, so anyone who would potentially be taking the bypass south, to exit and enter the city arent shown on the maps properly.
The bottom line is when the bypass was first given the go ahead, Regina and area was growing at a much different rate than it has been over the past few years.
A good number of the predicted traffic volume was tied to the GTH mess, so its no shock that only after a handful of weeks, numbers arent as high as expected.
Whether Regina hits that pace in the future again or not, factually every year the bypass makes more sense.
As Dengler said the biggest mistake here is Victoria Avenues development
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1580  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2019, 10:13 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,975
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Three points that I wanna make:
(1) It was a mistake to build up (and out) Victoria Avenue: We could have completely grade-separated it from RR to Balgonie and put a partial system interchange at RR;
(2) Even then, I’ve heard that RR can get stressed during rush hour;
(3) Most importantly, we are talking about the Trans-Canada Highway here, not just your back country road, but cross-country highway: It’s somewhat important to keep it free-flowing. Bref, at least SK didn’t repeat the mistakes of MB (aka putting traffic lights). *cough cough*
Just jab that knife a little deeper haha. Yes, we know all too well thank you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:58 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.