Quote:
Originally Posted by xnyr
Sorry for getting OT...but, I don't think the limestone plays a role in building sway; it is merely a decorative skin and wouldn't strengthen the building; if anything, the limestone would break off if swaying was in issue in the ESB. I think it is more due to the the tapering mass of the ESB.
|
There's probably a dampening effect from the shear amount of masonry (columns are sheathed in brick, plus 1-2 layers of brick, THEN the limestone panels), but you're right in that it's still a curtain wall. It will, however, flex with the rest of the building without cracking. The main reason why the ESB is so stiff (roughly 1/2 to 1/3 of the sway of a modern building) is because it's so completely overbuilt. It uses something like twice the steel of a modern design. Steel was cheap, so was the labor used to put it up. Most of all, there were no computers to refine the design into something more economical.
There really isn't much concrete in the ESB (relatively speaking) compared to something like One57, or even 4 World Trade Center. It's a steel frame building, through and through. Then again, so is the memorial here. Actually, the basic framing system is quite similar between the ESB and the memorial, both being multiple span frames based on a roughly 30 foot column spacing. The scale of the columns, as well as the finishing materials (again, brick vs spray on insulation or concrete), are naturally different.