HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #15421  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2024, 12:40 AM
sjuser23 sjuser23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
'Equity in transportation' lol. Buzzwords. Closing two lanes of traffic to accommodate one bike and one electric scooter daily is ridiculous. You ARE against cars. There's a small clique of very online people who think Saint John will become Amsterdam on the Bay of Fundy if we inconvenience enough drivers. In practice bike lanes go utterly unused.

Saint John needs to commission existing bike lane usage studies before building a single new one, and also rip out those showing poor usage.

I am chiefly a pedestrian and our sidewalks are often in terrible shape, or simply absent in more sub/exurban areas. That should be prioritized over bike lane cargo cult vanity.
I am a driver myself, not a cyclist but i do know i'd rather live on a street like Manawagonish with 1 car lane each direction, 1 bike lane and sidewalks and trees than a 6 lane or 4 lane throughway. Are we designing streets for people who live here or people who drive through? Do you want your street to be a 4 lane throughway? Let's think of density and filling up space with people and buildings wherever possible rather than lanes of asphalt unneeded because someone wants to go 60 instead of 40 kph.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15422  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2024, 8:30 AM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 1,993
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjuser23 View Post
I am a driver myself, not a cyclist but i do know i'd rather live on a street like Manawagonish with 1 car lane each direction, 1 bike lane and sidewalks and trees than a 6 lane or 4 lane throughway. Are we designing streets for people who live here or people who drive through? Do you want your street to be a 4 lane throughway? Let's think of density and filling up space with people and buildings wherever possible rather than lanes of asphalt unneeded because someone wants to go 60 instead of 40 kph.
Apples and oranges. University Ave is a busy connector road lined with apartments that connects the North End to the hospital. Manawagonish is single family homes, schools, and small businesses. The road is already BUILT to be four lanes, in the fastest-growing part of town. There's no bikes on it, ever. This is not 'let's narrow Main to 4 lanes from 6' which at least has an end goal of improving density and non-car connectivity between the Old North End and the peninsula. It's an inconvenience and a waste of existing infrastructure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15423  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2024, 11:37 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
Apples and oranges. University Ave is a busy connector road lined with apartments that connects the North End to the hospital. Manawagonish is single family homes, schools, and small businesses. The road is already BUILT to be four lanes, in the fastest-growing part of town. There's no bikes on it, ever. This is not 'let's narrow Main to 4 lanes from 6' which at least has an end goal of improving density and non-car connectivity between the Old North End and the peninsula. It's an inconvenience and a waste of existing infrastructure.
In a rare case of agreement, I think the best idea is to focus on bike paths outside of Saint John’s narrow, ancient road network. Manawagonish road is one of the finest roads in the Saint John region…separated bike lanes on Manawagonish would be quite amazing, especially if hooked up with the Harbour Passage system, + an overpass over the throughway to connect Manawagonish Road/Greendale with the Carleton Peninsula and the Ocean.

Uptown doesn’t need many more bike paths, it needs a bike storage company where people feel safe to store their bikes from petty theft. More than anything… Saint John needs rental bikes along the Harbour Passage… aim for 20 stations and fill them in with the typical 10 bikes per station as we go. It’s better to have half empty stations where people never have to worry about encountering a full station where they can’t drop off their bikes. Toronto and Montreal require city staff with a bike F-350 and trailer to load up bikes and clear spots from full stations and fill in empty stations with bikes.

Saint John doesn’t need that type of service… if we start with 20 bike rental stations like they have in Toronto and Montreal, but half full, we might just have the perfect amount of bikes and stations for a city our size. The problem with Montreal and Toronto’s system is they have so many more stations, some incredible popular, some barely used at all. Saint John won’t have a need to pay workers to distribute the bikes from busy to to infrequently used stations.



A pedestrian bridge between Navy Island and Long Wharf, or a tunnel between St. John street and Lower Cover Loop/Three Sister’s would be a giant leap for bicycle pedestrian infrastructure between The Uptown/Central Peninsula and the West Side Peninsula (Carelton). Something which used to be quite strong, in the days of the Harbour Ferry. The West Side's strip of the Harbour Passage @ Marketplace is an abomination of Urban Planning, it's a bike path to and between nowhere!


Almost no one rides their bike here, and calling it part of the Harbour Passage is just a total misnomer. It's located beside the Harbour... you can see Uptown from this bike trail, but you can't actually get to Uptown without making a huge loop away from Uptown, down, around, and over the reversing falls bridge and back towards Uptown. A Tunnel would get you from Marketplace West's portion of the Harbour Passage, to the newly opened Lower Cove Loop extension of the Harbour Passage, in a matter of minutes!

Also, the Port could probably benefit with a tunnel or their own between Lower Cove Terminal and The West Side Docks. If a ferry isn’t the long term answer, due to continuous operation costs, I think a tunnel is the best option. A Navy Island Pedestrian bridge tall enough to not impede navigation would likely cost more and have higher long term maintenance costs than a simple pedestrian/ bicycle tunnel between St. John Street West and Water Street/Harbour Passage.

People on the cruise ships could walk to Martello Tower is less than half the time it current takes from the cruise terminals. Saint John’s Uptown is the densest urban area in the province, but used to be two or three times as dense. The West Side is right there beside it, but it’s incredibly disconnected from the main part of the city. A tunnel is the cheapest and easiest way to promote people walking and cycling between the two main historical peninsulas of our lovely seaside city. The city’s 3 million dollar plan to paint some bike lanes on a road Uptown is emblematic of how out of touch council is with what people in Saint John want them in terms of bicycle infrastructure.

People don’t want to ride their bike around Uptown, they want to ride their bikes to Uptown, park them, and pray they don’t get stolen. If there was safe places to store you bike, or just rental bikes like in bigger cities, a lot more people would use the Harbour Passage to get Uptown.

If the NB government can justify millions to operate car ferries to places like Long Reach for car commuters shopping and working and Saint John, they can also justify a tunnel for pedestrians and bicyclists between the two historical peninsulas of Canada’s original city and second largest sea port.

Last edited by EnvisionSaintJohn; Dec 5, 2024 at 11:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15424  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2024, 1:38 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 1,993
Not this again. The lower west has less than 3,000 people, presumably few of whom commute uptown. There is no justification for a tunnel or bridge or ferry. It would be unused and a burden to container and cruise traffic. Do you know how deep or how high such a crossing would need to be? It wouldn't even make sense. Your lines on a map don't take topography or geography into effect. There aren't 20,000 people chomping at the bit to use this. It's a pure novelty that only you want.

Harbour Passage efforts should be focused, for the thousandth time, on 1) Lower West to Reversing Falls from Riverview Dr, which is in the works AFAIK; 2) Reversing Falls to Bentley St, which could probably be partially paid for by Ocean Steel; 3) Extending from Tin Can Beach up Broad and Crown, the first segment (to Carmarthen or Wentworth, I forget which) has been budgeted for next year or the year after.

These are FEASIBLE and COST-EFFECTIVE improvements that can realistically happen if people push for them. They could lead to Marsh Creek being revitalized as a proper park, a true South End-Rockwood connection, Waterloo Village revitalization, and more. With the Main Street roadworks and whatever Brideau has planned on his massive holdings, the Old North End will also be better stitched into the urban core. This is all good stuff. It's all realistic stuff. Not moonshots requiring a stupendous amount of trilateral funding, cartoonishly expensive engineering challenges, pissing off DPWorld, and so on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15425  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2024, 6:13 PM
JakeNB JakeNB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Saint John
Posts: 194
I continue to think that the City should extend Harbour Passage from the Long Wharf area behind Harbour Passage to the Stanley Street pedestrian overpass and from there to the Public Gardens. Would be an easy, cost effective means of linking that whole area to the Uptown and waterfront.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15426  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2024, 6:17 PM
DyAm00394 DyAm00394 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Saint John, N.B
Posts: 1,993
A notice was just posted on the city's website about the proposal at 125 Gault Road:

"REASON FOR CHANGE: To expand the scope of commercial uses permitted on the portion of the site zoned General Commercial (CG) and allow for the construction of townhouses and multiple unit dwellings on the portion of the site to be rezoned to Mid-Rise Residential (RM).

https://saintjohn.ca/en/news-and-notices...-re-125-gault-road-portions-pid-00403535

Last edited by DyAm00394; Dec 5, 2024 at 6:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15427  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2024, 8:33 PM
DyAm00394 DyAm00394 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Saint John, N.B
Posts: 1,993
Envision Saint John Unveils Bold New Plans To Shape The Region’s Future.

https://www.envisionsaintjohn.com/envision-saint-john-unveils-bold-new-plans-shape-regions-future

“December 5th, 2024
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SAINT JOHN, N.B. – Envision Saint John: The Regional Growth Agency proudly announces the launch of two transformative initiatives to drive growth and prosperity across the Saint John Region. The Regional Economic Development Strategy and the Tourism Master Plan are comprehensive roadmaps that have come together following an extensive collaborative process involving consultations with key stakeholders, municipal partners, community leaders, residents and visitors.

The Regional Economic Development Strategy includes a comprehensive approach to economic development, prioritizing workforce development, infrastructure enhancements, business expansion and retention efforts, investment attraction as well as quality of life improvements.

The goal of the Tourism Master Plan is to enable the region to deliver a positive visitor experience while enhancing the quality of life for local residents. The plan emphasizes the importance of addressing infrastructure needs, diversifying attractions, enhancing visitor experience and extending the season.

“By collectively building on our strengths and uniqueness, the region can achieve great success. These plans are the product of meaningful collaboration, ensuring the voices of our partners and community shape the path forward,” said Andrew Beckett, CEO of Envision Saint John. “We’re excited to work together with regional partners and municipalities to showcase why this is the best place to live, visit, and invest. Success will rely on the collective efforts of many stakeholders.”

Development of these strategies began in January of 2024 with research and engagement including surveys, benchmarking and analysis of global trends. A regional assessment was completed by Resonance – a firm that specializes in destination, economic and urban development growth. Stakeholder engagement workshops took place in the Spring of 2024, with action planning rolling out throughout the summer and fall. CEO, Andrew Beckett has recently presented the strategies to all regional municipal councils”.

Link to the Economic Development Strategic Plan: https://www.envisionsaintjohn.com/sites/...Development%20Strategic%20Plan-FINAL.pdf

Link to the Tourism Master Plan: https://www.envisionsaintjohn.com/sites/...20Master%20Plan-FINAL%20compressed_0.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15428  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2024, 11:11 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,634
Meh. Seems like lots of busy work. Studies, surveys, yet more new plans and slogans every few years but not much other than trying to justify their continuing to feed at the public trough. Been like that since Enterprise Saint John was sent up 40 odd years ago. These things all read the same. It's like they bought a template somewhere and just plugged in local pictures and place names but the planning/development babble is universal!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15429  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2024, 4:33 AM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by DyAm00394 View Post
A notice was just posted on the city's website about the proposal at 125 Gault Road:

"REASON FOR CHANGE: To expand the scope of commercial uses permitted on the portion of the site zoned General Commercial (CG) and allow for the construction of townhouses and multiple unit dwellings on the portion of the site to be rezoned to Mid-Rise Residential (RM).

https://saintjohn.ca/en/news-and-notices...-re-125-gault-road-portions-pid-00403535
Two, 6-unit townhouses
• Seven, 18-unit buildings,
• Two, 12-unit buildings
• One, 24-unit building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15430  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2024, 5:30 AM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 1,993
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeNB View Post
I continue to think that the City should extend Harbour Passage from the Long Wharf area behind Harbour Passage to the Stanley Street pedestrian overpass and from there to the Public Gardens. Would be an easy, cost effective means of linking that whole area to the Uptown and waterfront.
Station-Stanley-Wright-Spruce-through the Public Gardens? That would be a good one. It's a nice little neighbourhood. That pedestrian overpass needs a serious overhaul.

The Paradise/Rockland/Winter ramps need a serious realignment. It's an easily fixed mess. Potential for QSR/fuel in the Hoovervilles between the new substation and the ramps too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15431  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2024, 11:42 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
Not this again. The lower west has less than 3,000 people, presumably few of whom commute uptown. There is no justification for a tunnel or bridge or ferry. It would be unused and a burden to container and cruise traffic. Do you know how deep or how high such a crossing would need to be? It wouldn't even make sense. Your lines on a map don't take topography or geography into effect. There aren't 20,000 people chomping at the bit to use this. It's a pure novelty that only you want.

Harbour Passage efforts should be focused, for the thousandth time, on 1) Lower West to Reversing Falls from Riverview Dr, which is in the works AFAIK; 2) Reversing Falls to Bentley St, which could probably be partially paid for by Ocean Steel; 3) Extending from Tin Can Beach up Broad and Crown, the first segment (to Carmarthen or Wentworth, I forget which) has been budgeted for next year or the year after.

These are FEASIBLE and COST-EFFECTIVE improvements that can realistically happen if people push for them. They could lead to Marsh Creek being revitalized as a proper park, a true South End-Rockwood connection, Waterloo Village revitalization, and more. With the Main Street roadworks and whatever Brideau has planned on his massive holdings, the Old North End will also be better stitched into the urban core. This is all good stuff. It's all realistic stuff. Not moonshots requiring a stupendous amount of trilateral funding, cartoonishly expensive engineering challenges, pissing off DPWorld, and so on.

The idea that you consider building a tunnel a moonshot shows just how short sighted you tend to be Adam. Building a tunnel could even end up being cheaper than building a second bridge for pedestrians, and would have far lower ongoing costs then the return of a harbour ferry.. To suggest i’m the only one that wants to better connect the West Side and Uptown with more direct connections for pedestrians and bicyclists is not only inaccurate, it’s frankly sad, considering you grew up in this neighbourhood. What are the lines on the map missing in terms of topography and geography? This is being presented as an idea, not a detailed engineering plan.

As for a tunnel or ferry being unused, you provide no evidence other than stating a cherry picked population figures. There’s far more people that live on the West Side’s peninsula than this 3000 figure you keep mentioning. How many people live in Long Reach, NB?? Why they do they deserve a government funded ferry, but residents of the West Side and Uptown? You’ve presenef no evidence as to how a ferry would interfere with container traffic. You certainly don’t think a tunnel would interfere with the port, do you? Heck, they might even have a justification to get a tunnel built of their own to connect their Lower Cover terminal with the West Side Docks.

Not only would a pedestrian/ bicycle tunnel not be pure novelty, and used by thousands of residents and tourists, it would help revitalize the West Side. There’d be more interest from developers to get some ambitious projects built on this side of the harbour with amazing views of the harbour and the ocean, if the West Side had a direct connection with Uptown Saint John, like a tunnel or ferry. You’d like actually be opposed if the federal government and province actually wanted to build a tunnel or fund a new Saint John Harbour Ferry service?

Btw, the city does have plans for a direct link between the West Side and Uptown via the harbour bridge. It would be a huge improvement to the current situation where people must walk all the way around via reversing falls, but if recall correctly, you’re even opposed to this approach.


This might be the most cost effective solution to creating an actual “harbour passage” between the West side and East side of Saint John Harbour, but it doesn’t exactly seem bicycle friendly, as they have it labelled as “walking path”. A ferry or tunnel would, by their very nature, be bicycle friendly. Personally, the more I think about it, the more a tunnel actually makes more sense compared with the return of a cross harbour ferry. Just because some people think a tunnel must be cost prohibitive doesn’t mean it’s true… this is the type of big idea we need to entice people to walk or ride their bikes to Uptown from the West Side, and vice versa, not millions of dollars spent on bike lanes in the middle of Uptown. The focus should be getting people to Uptown by bicycle or by walking, not getting people around Uptown, which is already the most walkable part of our city.

Bike rental stations would be far smarter investments than the city’s current focus on bike lanes and road diets. Almost no one wants to ride their bikes on the road of Saint John, but I think many would be interested in walk to the nearest bike rental station near them, and riding that bike Uptown, where there would be stations to drop off said rental bike.

Edit: the part you seem to gloss over or ignore regarding the tunnel is the land reclamation/ remediation piece. A lot of earth would have to be moved to dig a tunnel between the West Side and Uptown… the sugar refinery site is right there. It would be a prime piece of real estate if not for some soil toxicity and structural reasons. There would be more than enough earth moved from the construction of a West Side Uptown tunnel for a project to revitalize the Sugar Refinery Site and open it up for development. Same could be said for that decrepit pier on the West Side, the earth from the tunnel project could be used to rebuild that pier which the Port will utilize as it continues to expand.


You'd imagine the earth moved from creating the tunnel could go a long ways in terms of reclaiming/remediating land in these two sites highlighted.

Last edited by EnvisionSaintJohn; May 13, 2025 at 6:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15432  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2024, 12:19 PM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeNB View Post
I continue to think that the City should extend Harbour Passage from the Long Wharf area behind Harbour Passage to the Stanley Street pedestrian overpass and from there to the Public Gardens. Would be an easy, cost effective means of linking that whole area to the Uptown and waterfront.
That would be a good idea. I’ll just add, what the City really needs to look at adding is a useful Pedestrian Overpass over the through way that connects the West Side Peninsula with the Fairville Plaza shopping:




We do already have a pedestrian overpass that traverses the throughway. However, it connects The West Side Peninsula with barely more than a dozen homes on Riverview Drive… where there already exits a highway underpass! (Circled at the bottom)



We like literally built this thing so a few people at the top of Riverview Drive could walk to Tim Horton’s faster… I don’t know who, but it seems like someone highly influential lives or lived on Riverview drive to get that Pedestrian Overpass built where it is, especially considering the underpass already existed at the bottom of Riverview Dr.

This overpass never should have been built before one that crossed the throughway at a more useful location like Molson Ave/Fairville Plaza. Yet, it did.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15433  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2024, 2:23 AM
DyAm00394 DyAm00394 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Saint John, N.B
Posts: 1,993
Quote:
Originally Posted by DyAm00394 View Post
A notice was just posted on the city's website about the proposal at 125 Gault Road:

"REASON FOR CHANGE: To expand the scope of commercial uses permitted on the portion of the site zoned General Commercial (CG) and allow for the construction of townhouses and multiple unit dwellings on the portion of the site to be rezoned to Mid-Rise Residential (RM).

https://saintjohn.ca/en/news-and-notices...-re-125-gault-road-portions-pid-00403535
Like cdnguys mentioned earlier, what's planned is:
• Two, 6-unit townhouses
• Seven, 18-unit buildings,
• Two, 12-unit buildings
• One, 24-unit building.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15434  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2024, 12:11 PM
nwalbert nwalbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by DyAm00394 View Post
Like cdnguys mentioned earlier, what's planned is:
• Two, 6-unit townhouses
• Seven, 18-unit buildings,
• Two, 12-unit buildings
• One, 24-unit building.

This seems like a quite a substantial project, especially for that area of the West side. Great news. Amazing how many projects happening across the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15435  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2024, 1:02 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 1,993
Quote:
Originally Posted by DyAm00394 View Post
Like cdnguys mentioned earlier, what's planned is:
• Two, 6-unit townhouses
• Seven, 18-unit buildings,
• Two, 12-unit buildings
• One, 24-unit building.
Somebody bought a bunch of lots centred around this big one, just north of the existing subdivision, in late November. I wonder if it's the same person as the developer of the project you mention?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15436  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2024, 4:59 PM
DyAm00394 DyAm00394 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Saint John, N.B
Posts: 1,993
More than $20 million has been announced for the new 56-unit Steepleview Apartments development on Cliff Street.

https://www.country94.ca/2024/12/13/more-than-20m-for-saint-john-housing-project/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15437  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2024, 6:56 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,634
Car wash at the Tipsy Tomato site in Millidgeville was demolished today to make room for the 2nd of the 3 apartment buildings planned for the site. My understanding is that after the second building is done the two commercial buildings facing each other will be demolished to make room for building #3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15438  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2024, 7:54 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 1,993
A couple north end vacant building renovations in PAC this week. Both from the same developer. 9 Waring St near Victoria Park, and 49 Adelaide beside OK Tire. Both projects will convert the buildings into various small units, mostly bachelors, and have very ugly renders.

Both have been vacant since the current developer acquired them in 2020 and 2022, and neighbouring property owners are dubious anything will happen/concerned with ongoing crime.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15439  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2024, 12:44 PM
KnoxfordGuy's Avatar
KnoxfordGuy KnoxfordGuy is offline
New Brunswick booster!
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fredericton, New Brunswick
Posts: 2,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by DyAm00394 View Post
More than $20 million has been announced for the new 56-unit Steepleview Apartments development on Cliff Street.

https://www.country94.ca/2024/12/13/more-than-20m-for-saint-john-housing-project/
Yikes. A lot of security issues with this development. Is it a dangerous neighbourhood?
__________________
Fredericton. Noble Daughter Of The Forest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15440  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2024, 1:12 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnoxfordGuy View Post
Yikes. A lot of security issues with this development. Is it a dangerous neighbourhood?
This building is well underway. How is it that this funding is just being announced?..... or is this just government "re-announcing" already allocated money to maximize publicity and political gains?

As to the neighbourhood.....this is homeless/street people central for Saint John. Waterloo is home to a shelter, a "harm reduction" organization and a homeless encampment with shipping containers (referred to "Area 911" by many due to multiple police calls for service)

Lots of petty property crime (and occasionally violent crime)on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:31 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.