HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1521  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2026, 6:24 AM
BAKGUY BAKGUY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wpg_Guy View Post
The new development at the site would create a tower with 307 apartments, including 40 or more affordable units, and some commercial space on its ground floor, said Rochelle Squires, chief executive officer of CentreVenture Development Corporation.

MY question is what "Tower" and where does that go and what about the rest of the 2 sections of the hotel?
A hotel would have been preferable but as long as public access to the main floor and all 8th floor Ballrooms hopefully then that will be fine.
Besides The Skyview, there is another very ornate and special as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1522  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2026, 1:53 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,618
they own the garick theater i thought as well
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1523  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2026, 2:41 PM
Unbending's Avatar
Unbending Unbending is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 207
I was wondering about that too: “The new development would create a tower with 307 apartments…” But maybe the tower is just referring to the existing building. Anything in Winnipeg above 5 floor is somehow considered a ‘tower’.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1524  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2026, 4:38 PM
neutroniks neutroniks is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 722
Yeah, for its height, back in the day the Marlborough is considered a tower. At at that, the new apartment building going up in China Town is called Shanghai Tower LOL. I forget what height a building needs to be in metres to be considered categorically as a "tower"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1525  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2026, 5:20 PM
BAKGUY BAKGUY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by neutroniks View Post
Yeah, for its height, back in the day the Marlborough is considered a tower. At at that, the new apartment building going up in China Town is called Shanghai Tower LOL. I forget what height a building needs to be in metres to be considered categorically as a "tower"
7 floors for Shanghai Towers...a Tower definition - Although number of floors is a poor indicator of defining a tall building due to the changing floor to floor height between differing buildings and functions (e.g. office versus residential usage), a building of perhaps 14 or more stories (or over 50 meters/165 feet in height) could perhaps be used as a threshold.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1526  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2026, 6:09 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,667
I think these are the basic building height classifications: Winnipeg has no Skyscrapers.

low-rise (<15m) 1-4 stories
mid-rise (15–50m) often 5–12 stories
high-rise (50–150m) roughly 14+ stories
skyscrapers (150m-300m)
supertall (300m-600m)
megatall (600m+)
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1527  
Old Posted Yesterday, 1:02 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 6,410
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wpg_Guy View Post
Councillor John Orlikow of course, is doing his best to restrict any infill in his ward as the Committee recommended rejection of this application.
One Academy Road project supported, another rejected
By: Sheldon Birnie STAFF REPORTER
Wednesday, Mar. 4, 2026

The City Centre community committee held a regular meeting on Feb. 23, and a number of hearings were held on proposed projects in the area.

A rezoning and variance application for 158 Oxford St., from single-family large to residential multi-family low density zoning, was heard, for the development of a six-unit building on the 60-foot-by-120-foot corner lot along Academy Road. The variance relates to site configuration and alignment.

Over a half dozen residents registered to speak in opposition, plus one who registered to ask for further information. Concerns included a potential increase in traffic and parking, lack of consultation with the community, and lack of fit with the existing neighbourhood.


A rezoning and variance application for 160 Ash St., from single-family large to residential multi-family low density, for the development of a five-unit townhouse style building on the corner lot along Academy Road, was approved by the City Centre community committee on Feb. 23.

The committee voted against the public service’s recommendation, and did not support the application.

“Having six (units) plus no visitor spots, you’re going to negatively impact the neighbourhood… I don’t see any residents who support it,” said Coun. John Orlikow (River Heights-Fort Garry).

A rezoning and variance application for 160 Ash St., from single-family large to residential multi-family low-density zoning, for the development of a five-unit townhouse style building on the corner lot along Academy Road was also heard. The variances are for a smaller rear-side yard and south-side yard along Academy Road. The plans include 10 parking stalls in the back, with access from the back lane. The proponents cited a number of examples of properties along Academy with similar variances and setbacks.

Three area residents spoke in opposition to the project, citing concerns such as impacts to traffic and privacy, and destruction of mature trees, among others. The committee agreed with the public service’s recommendation to approve the application, adding a requirement to return to the committee for final plan approval prior to beginning construction.

“It’s a little strange, in style,” Orlikow said. “But it’s not that strange (and) there is a need for densification.”

Orlikow also noted that the developer’s consultation with both his office and with the community was appreciated.

Finally, a variance application at 130 Sherbrook St., to amend a requirement of the development condition to include 18, rather than 38, affordable units and to establish an accessory parking area for the mixed-use development was heard by the committee. Nobody was registered in opposition, and the committee approved the application.

During the regular meeting, a plan for a proposed McDonald’s drive-through only restaurant at 540 Kenaston Blvd., at the northwest corner of the Superstore parking lot, was approved. Community fund grants of $500 for École JB Mitchell School’s parent council, as well as a $500 grant for the Fort Garry Women’s Resource Centre, were approved.

Coun. Cindy Gilroy (Daniel McIntyre) put forward a motion to turn a former bus loop in Wolseley into a dog park, should Winnipeg Transit not need the space, given the changes made to the transit system. The motion was approved.
Free Press Community Review: West
__________________
Winnipeg Act II - April 2024

Winnipeg Developments

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1528  
Old Posted Yesterday, 7:20 AM
biguc's Avatar
biguc biguc is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pinkoland
Posts: 11,815
Over a half dozen residents registered to speak in opposition! So, 7?
__________________
no
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1529  
Old Posted Yesterday, 10:05 AM
Spocket's Avatar
Spocket Spocket is online now
Back from the dead
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,576
Re: Marlborough Hotel conversion.

I don't know how many square feet the Marlborough is but I can't see how they'd fit 307 units in what's currently there. I guess if they make it into closet apartments, they could do it. On the other hand, I have no idea where they could possibly build, anyway. Can the extension support more floors? I doubt it but I don't know.

I did some quick math and it seems that if you assume the average unit is 600 square feet (fairly small one bedroom apartment) you need about a 200,000 square foot building. Turns out there's no data on that the Marlborough's square footage but if it's 200K square feet, I'd be surprised. And, as I said, those are fairly small units.

So, it seems they'd need more room to build the required units to match the number cited. I don't know where they're going to get that room unless the structures can support additions which seems unlikely. Maybe one of the resident architects can weigh in how many units they think would fit in those buildings. I can't see a bunch of one bedrooms on the small side being particularly attractive to anybody and even less so for anything besides young couples (at most)

And, just to help visualize what I'm talking about, 300 main contains 398 units.
__________________
Giving you a reason to drink and drive since 1975.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1530  
Old Posted Yesterday, 4:44 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,667
My rough calculations put the Marlborough at about 225,000 to 250,000 sq ft.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1531  
Old Posted Yesterday, 5:07 PM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,260
The thing that gets me somewhat excited here is that once completed and occupied, this brings several hundred residents to that corner, hopefully encouraging more development westward down Ellice and the parking lot across the street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1532  
Old Posted Today, 5:38 AM
Pmac1 Pmac1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2025
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by WinCitySparky View Post
The thing that gets me somewhat excited here is that once completed and occupied, this brings several hundred residents to that corner, hopefully encouraging more development westward down Ellice and the parking lot across the street.
God it would be incredible if that parking lot gets developed
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:33 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.