HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1501  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2010, 10:15 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Empire View Post
Great points, I would go so far as to say add affordable housing residential above...the Staples example would have been perfect for 8 storeys of income assisted and regular housing.
Well that comes back to the conversation I had with the area councillor about my personal vision for the area - I thought that having some income adjusted apartments in that location and up to Cornwallis along the street would be great. Then the more market driven (non subsidized) condo units could run the rest of the street.

She thought it was a pretty interesting idea since there seemed to be support for redeveloping the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1502  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2010, 10:49 PM
Canadian_Bacon's Avatar
Canadian_Bacon Canadian_Bacon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 239
I really like how that home depot is set up on the street like that. Big box and other buildings in Halifax should be set up like that along the streets. Pedestrian traffic is just as important as vehicle traffic, and the more pedestrians walking around instead of cars in the downtown, the better.
__________________
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
- Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1503  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2010, 11:13 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian_Bacon View Post
I really like how that home depot is set up on the street like that. Big box and other buildings in Halifax should be set up like that along the streets. Pedestrian traffic is just as important as vehicle traffic, and the more pedestrians walking around instead of cars in the downtown, the better.
I thought it was great; and apparently it wasn't a huge fight during the permit process. From what I understand; it was a fight leading up to the application though; as the applicants did a number of pre-applications with city staff.

They didn't want to follow the area redevelopment plan; which talks about pedestrian oriented buildings in the area. So staff told them up front; don't bother applying if you aren't going to do what the ARP tells them - because they wouldn't waste their time in supporting it. Plus; the community was behind administration's position - so I guess they figured if administration was not prepared to give an approval and it would end up at appeal (with the community on the side of administration) their chances of getting a refusal overturned were pretty small. The councillor for the area was also involved and was behind administration too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1504  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2010, 11:02 AM
Empire's Avatar
Empire Empire is offline
Salty Town
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halifax
Posts: 2,197
It`s about time this reality received some press. The Dexter Gov. should really work this study to pour money into Halifax. More tourists in Halifax will mean spillover for the region. More busineess and industry in Halifax will mean more people in rural areas will be able to continue to live there by providing support for business and industry or by having their tax burden eased by HFX tax$$$.

http://thechronicleherald.ca/Front/1194389.html

Economy hinges on Halifax, study says
Prof has 24 ideas to spark N.S. prosperity
By JEFFREY SIMPSON Provincial Reporter and The Canadian Press
Fri, Jul 30 - 4:53 AM

DONALD SAVOIE

The economic success of Nova Scotia, and the other Maritime provinces, hinges largely on the health and prosperity of Halifax, a new study says.

Donald Savoie, who submitted his report on Nova Scotia’s economic development efforts to Premier Darrell Dexter on Thursday, is recommending the province capitalize to a greater extent on Halifax’s potential to spur wider growth and investment in the region.

"It’s a gem of a city, it’s a world-class city," said Savoie, a professor of public administration at the University of Moncton.

Savoie cited several attributes of the capital that could be further promoted to attract more business, including its natural geographic location next to the ocean, top-tier schools and research facilities such as Dalhousie University, and thriving firms like Ocean Nutrition.

"Success breeds success, and Halifax has spawned a fair number of success stories," Savoie said.

But it will be difficult for rural areas to prosper without Halifax leading the way, he said.

"There are people who point to Halifax to explain their economic woes," he said.

"Rural Nova Scotia needs a strong Halifax."

Savoie’s 45-page report, titled Invest More, Innovate More, Trade More, Learn More: The Way Ahead for Nova Scotia, lists 24 recommendations that include setting up a $50-million venture capital fund and cutting some corporate taxes.

Developing human resources through greater education and training — whether through adult learning, upgrading skills or stay-in-school programs — is at the top of the list, Savoie said.

"You can’t get it wrong if you go there," he said.

"Economic development is people."

But the province also needs to streamline its efforts to promote economic development, tasking Nova Scotia Business Inc. with making first contact with new firms from other areas and designating Innovacorp as the body dealing with all venture capital matters.

"There’s an awful lot of people running around doing economic development in Nova Scotia," Savoie said.

"We certainly don’t need more. They’re tripping over each other."

Savoie, who has written about regional development for 20 years, said Nova Scotia businesses need to invest more in research, and one way to do that would be to set up a venture capital fund with federal, provincial and private funds.

He said there’s a lack of venture capital in the Atlantic region, and small companies have a harder time finding startup cash than firms in Ontario, Quebec or the West do.

Savoie said Ottawa could provide $10 million to $20 million to help create a venture capital fund in the region, and the province should match that and then invite private partners to run the fund. He expects private venture capital investors would then match the public money.

"I’m saying they should go after the federal dollars . . . and it should be located in Halifax and it should have the freedom to invest wherever there are opportunities in Atlantic Canada," Savoie said.

Venture capitalists generally invest in small startup firms with the aim of helping them grow large enough to become profitable, publicly traded companies.

Savoie’s report also calls for the elimination of the province’s capital tax, which the Dexter government is already phasing out.

In addition, Savoie said, the province should increase tax credits for businesses that invest in themselves.

Dexter asked Savoie to come up with ideas on how the government could help the province’s private sector after an economic advisory report last November noted Nova Scotia’s dire financial situation.

Savoie acknowledged his proposals would cost the province more in tax revenues at a time when it is facing budget deficits. But he argued that the province must consider how much revenue a growing private sector could generate if it could invest more in its productivity.

Savoie also gave the government credit for trying to get the province’s financial house in order. He said Nova Scotia compares favourably to neighbouring provinces such as New Brunswick, which is facing a $750-million deficit and still unwisely planning to cut taxes.

"The Dexter government has made some courageous steps forward," Savoie said.

"Some tough decisions have been made."

Dexter commissioned the independent report at a cost of $85,000 and will now send it to his Council on the Economy for further study.

"There’s a lot to chew on in the Savoie report," the premier said.

"These are all things that we’ll be considering over the next couple months."

Liberal economic development critic Zach Churchill urged the province to immediately adopt some of Savoie’s recommendations, especially making its tax regime more competitive.

"We’ve been encouraging this government to reduce small business taxes," Churchill said.

"We need to make sure we have a system that supports small business owners and entrepreneurs."

Churchill also said a high HST and personal income taxes are holding the province back.

( [email protected])

‘Rural Nova Scotia needs a strong Halifax.’
__________________
Salty Town
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1505  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2010, 11:15 AM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
I just posted the same article in the Economic Scorecard thread. It sounds like a well thought out piece.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1506  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2010, 11:48 PM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,769
http://www.cbc.ca/edmonton/webcam/webcam-lrg.html

Does anyone know the name and purpose of the building in the background. Just caught my eye when I was viewing this webcam. I only know one person that lives in Edmonton and can't get ahold of him.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1507  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2010, 11:57 PM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstaleness View Post
http://www.cbc.ca/edmonton/webcam/webcam-lrg.html

Does anyone know the name and purpose of the building in the background. Just caught my eye when I was viewing this webcam. I only know one person that lives in Edmonton and can't get ahold of him.
If you are referring to the oddly shaped building (but very interesting) then I think it is the Art Gallery of Alberta - http://www.artknowledgenews.com/2010-02-...s-a-museum-of-national-significance.html . I have never been to Edmonton but had seen a picture of this building previously. Halifax needs buildings like this - unique. How would the Heritage Trust react to such a proposal? (maybe the new Central Library will be unique).

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1508  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2010, 12:13 AM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,769
Thanks, That's the one. I really would love for Halifax to have something like this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1509  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2010, 8:12 AM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstaleness View Post
http://www.cbc.ca/edmonton/webcam/webcam-lrg.html

Does anyone know the name and purpose of the building in the background. Just caught my eye when I was viewing this webcam. I only know one person that lives in Edmonton and can't get ahold of him.
Oh the AGA! It's a really cool looking building and really is a great element to Churchill Square.

I'm going to meet some friends in Edmonton at the end of the month; I'll put that on my list of things to take pictures of while I'm there to give you a better idea of the buildings around. It's on the east side of Churchill square (which below it is the Churchill LRT station); which is the big cultural gathering spot. It's also got a wading pool for kids in the summer, which becomes an ice rink in the winter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1510  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2010, 4:04 PM
Jonovision's Avatar
Jonovision Jonovision is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,051
Council to push ahead with south-end land use bylaw changes


By PAT LEE

Staff Reporter

Regional council has agreed to fast-track land-use bylaw chang es for south-end Halifax, which has been “under siege" from the threat of infilling, says a council lor.

Coun. Sue Uteck (Northwest Arm-South End) said it is crucial that five proposed bylaw chang es be put in place as soon as possible because there are only about a dozen lots left for poten tial development.

In June, Uteck tabled a pet ition with 67 signatures in sup port of the five changes.

“This is a race to see what’s going to happen with the rest of the south end," she told council Tuesday.

Residents are concerned that lots intended for single-family homes could be subdivided or normal street setbacks could be ignored in the area bounded by Oakland Road, Bellevue Avenue, Inglis Street and Beaufort Ave nue.

At a 2008 public meeting, residents pointed to a property near Young Avenue and Atlantic Street where a lot with one house was converted into a lot with four homes.

Another property that created concerns was at the corner of Beaufort Avenue and Regina Terrace. There, the traditional front-yard setback from the street was cut in half to squeeze in a new home.

Staff with Halifax Regional Municipality had recommended the planning proposals go through the HRM by Design process, but Uteck said that will take too long.

“It’s too late," she said.

The petition called for five amendments that restrict new right-of-ways, increase the mini mum lot size, increase the mini mum lot frontage, decrease lot coverage and ensure front yards meet the average size of other homes.

Community development director Paul Dunphy said the changes are possible.

“We’re not arguing strenuous ly against this," Dunphy said.

“But we don’t want to go into the south end and start a broad based engagement that looks at all the houses and all the regu­lations."

He said approving the five amendments doesn’t mean the HRM by Design process can’t still go ahead. It deals with broader planning, social and recreational issues in a neigh bourhood.

([email protected])
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1511  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2010, 4:04 PM
Jonovision's Avatar
Jonovision Jonovision is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,051
Urban core: more at stake than two developments


By BERNARD SMITH

We may be losing the art of debate and replacing it with an aggressive imperative to win. If this is so, it is regrettable: De bate at least stands some chance of extracting the best from the disparate views. Surely we should aspire to reach the best.

A recent article in this news paper by Laura Penny compares the two current major invest ment options being contemplat ed for Halifax, the new civic library and the proposed con vention centre. In the article, the library is seen as a needed pub lic investment while the conven tion centre is seen as an inap propriate subsidization of en trepreneurial activity.

There are some interesting parallels between the two pro jects which have not been fully examined in Ms. Penny’s article. First, both of the issues are before us at this time due to the fact that previous generations did not build edifices that were sufficiently large or flexible.

They were built for what ap peared to be the reasonable needs of their time.

What those before us failed to do, however, was to allow for sufficient future adaptability.

Both of these existing facilities have been judged unable to be satisfactorily expanded. This generation faces the question of whether to invest further sub stantial funding into new facil ities as a result of not being able to modify existing structures.

There are more parallels to be examined. Going beyond the immediate issue of funding, we are faced with the possible re­placement of two public facil ities — one a learning centre, the second a large meeting space — both of which could be rendered obsolete by rapidly advancing technology and by changes in public demand or needs. Surely one lesson to be learned from this is to insist on maximum possible flexibility being built into new facilities.

Who can see ahead 30 years to the needs of the library and the convention centre in 2040, any more than they could see ahead to our present needs back when the original facilities were put in place? We should surely learn from past decisions and build in the potential to adapt and possibly to expand. There will almost inevitability be a future need in our society for large meeting spaces and for smaller meeting and research spaces, for isn’t that what these facilities really are?

How these facilities are to be financed is really another issue, which isn’t helped by bringing in the ghosts of past efforts at economic expansion. These are needed pieces of public infra structure which would normally be provided by government.

Shell-shocked by the very exam ples alluded to in the article, government is less anxious to develop and run major facilities, even though government can still borrow at lower cost than the private sector and is still expected to lead the way in many respects.

Government has been shocked by its inability to build well and operate economically, even if it can borrow well. A few more P3 fiascos may cause us to put government back into its historic delivery mode.

The P3 schools were surely mainly brought about by poor government tendering and con tract administration in the past.

This left us with some poorly constructed and designed facil ities, which, combined with a lack of adequate maintenance, resulted in the need to replace them. Had that been competent ly dealt with in the past, we might not have needed replace ment schools in the form of P3s in an effort to keep debt off the government balance sheet.

There are at least two other major gaps in our downtown streetscapes and a great deal more under-utilization to be considered in addition to the library and former Herald sites: the site of the much-debated “Twisted Sisters," which seems likely to remain vacant for some years to come, and the once again ignored Cogswell inter change. We must ask ourselves, as a society, why sites in our downtown remain undeveloped. A major potential building at the end of Granville Mall, own ed by Sobeys, has remained undeveloped, with all approvals in place for an immediate start, for the past 30 years. The Sobey empire can provide the needed funds to build with little more than the stroke of a pen. The reasons these lands remain vacant are the very reasons why our downtown struggles.

Somewhere between relative commercial taxation levels, the availability of subsidized land on the periphery, the effective ness and cost of transportation, and the changing needs of busi ness, lies a $10-per-square-foot, per year, cost differential be tween our downtown core and suburban commercial sites.

Until we, as a society, recognize and debate these issues, we will continue to have under-uti lization in our city centre and arguments about how and where to invest will continue.

In all probability, many of these fights about whether “to build or not to build" in our urban centre would not take place if the area was vibrant and successful. Developers would have more resources to devote to making their buildings in novative and attractive.

The underlying fact is that the city should deal with this disad vantage to its urban core.

Bernard Smith is manager of the Spring Garden Area Business Asso ciation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1512  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 4:42 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,681
The South End article is depressingly classic NIMBYism - we have our houses and the students should go live out in Clayton Park or something. Note how there's also no comment about the quality of new development, just complaints about how it might happen.

The South End is an inner-city neighbourhood in a growing metropolitan area. It makes no sense to preserve all of it as single family dwellings. Some areas like Inglis are also underdeveloped and much quieter than they should be. Adding more apartments and condos to the mix would be a very positive thing for the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1513  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 7:08 AM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonovision View Post
Council to push ahead with south-end land use bylaw changes

By PAT LEE

Staff Reporter

Regional council has agreed to fast-track land-use bylaw chang es for south-end Halifax, which has been “under siege" from the threat of infilling, says a council lor.

Coun. Sue Uteck (Northwest Arm-South End) said it is crucial that five proposed bylaw changes be put in place as soon as possible because there are only about a dozen lots left for poten tial development.

In June, Uteck tabled a petition with 67 signatures in support of the five changes.

“This is a race to see what’s going to happen with the rest of the south end," she told council Tuesday.

Residents are concerned that lots intended for single-family homes could be subdivided or normal street setbacks could be ignored in the area bounded by Oakland Road, Bellevue Avenue, Inglis Street and Beaufort Avenue.

At a 2008 public meeting, residents pointed to a property near Young Avenue and Atlantic Street where a lot with one house was converted into a lot with four homes.

Another property that created concerns was at the corner of Beaufort Avenue and Regina Terrace. There, the traditional front-yard setback from the street was cut in half to squeeze in a new home.

Staff with Halifax Regional Municipality had recommended the planning proposals go through the HRM by Design process, but Uteck said that will take too long.

“It’s too late," she said.

The petition called for five amendments that restrict new right-of-ways, increase the mini mum lot size, increase the mini mum lot frontage, decrease lot coverage and ensure front yards meet the average size of other homes.

Community development director Paul Dunphy said the changes are possible.

“We’re not arguing strenuously against this," Dunphy said.

“But we don’t want to go into the south end and start a broad based engagement that looks at all the houses and all the regu­lations."

He said approving the five amendments doesn’t mean the HRM by Design process can’t still go ahead. It deals with broader planning, social and recreational issues in a neigh bourhood.

([email protected])
This like everything else in the city should be debated and the all possible ramifications looked at. Eventually this could extend throughout the South End - what effect will that have on a very large employer like Dalhousie University? I find Councillor Uteck is very heavy-handed, as when she stated that there should be no debate on a third harbour crossing (I am paraphrasing). Her desires should not become the desires of the entire municipality. We live in a democracy, so others have the right to express their opinions. Is she against a North West Arm crossing also? Maybe these things are required for the greater good of the municipality. Simply because the councillor lives in the South End, that doesn't mean that the South End should have priority over all other business.

Why are staff recommendations so seldom followed by regional council?

This really should be debated in council so that the municipality doesn't end up having more bylaws that stifle growth like the Citadel view planes bylaws have stifled economic growth.

Does Councillor Uteck know of possible changes being proposed under an expanded HRM by Design that she is trying to circumvent?

Last edited by fenwick16; Aug 5, 2010 at 7:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1514  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 4:09 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Not sure where to put this; but enjoy!

McCluskey, Blumenthal likely won't run again

By MICHAEL LIGHTSTONE City Hall Reporter
Thu, Aug 5 - 5:30 AM

Editor's note: We are no longer accepting comments on this story.

Two veteran members of Halifax regional council said this week that the sun is slowly setting on their political careers.

Coun. Gloria McCluskey (Dart­mouth Centre) and Coun. Jerry Blumenthal (Halifax North End) told council Tuesday that they don’t see themselves running for re-election in 2012.

They made their remarks dur­ing a long and, at times, testy debate on the size of council.

McCluskey is a former Dart­mouth mayor first elected to regional council in October 2004. She’s been a popular and savvy council member who has ad­vocated tirelessly for her district.

Blumenthal was initially elect­ed in 1994 as an alderman for the former City of Halifax. He served for 10 years on council and then was re-elected in 2008 following a break the previous term.

McCluskey and Blumenthal are two of the older members of council. Each has served on several municipal boards and commissions and are known for wearing their hearts on their sleeve.

There are 23 members of re­gional council plus the mayor.

Council on Tuesday voted not to reduce the number of repre­sentatives, a decision that fol­lowed three attempts to pare the size of the group.

The politicians stuck with the 23-member team after voting against having 16, 18 and 20 members around the table. The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board will ultimately decide how many are appropriate.

Aside from new faces occupy­ing council seats to be vacated by Blumenthal and McCluskey, others, including the mayor’s chair, could have different people in them in 2012.

If a councillor challenges May­or Peter Kelly in the next elec­tion, that person’s seat will need to be filled — regardless of the outcome of the mayoral race.

Should a challenger to Kelly emerge from outside regional council and that candidate is successful, the mayor’s seat will have a new occupant.

It’s early but Kelly has hinted he intends to run again next time. In 2011, he will mark 11 years as mayor and tie the late Ron Wallace as Halifax’s longest­serving mayor.

(from the Chronicle Herald)

All I can say is buh-bye! If they don't run again; you will finally be able to get things done in the North end of Halifax and maybe get that damn brightwood viewplane removed!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1515  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 4:40 PM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,769
I can't believe I'm asking this but I just couldn't figure out what Crane I was looking at. When coming in on the 103 just as the exit for St. Margaret's Bay Rd/Lakeside there is a crane directly straight ahead. It's not the bayers rd crane and I can't see it being the Trillium crane. Am I wrong? Would the Trillium be visable from out there?? Feeling really dumb but it didn't look red and white like the Trill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1516  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 4:50 PM
bluenoser's Avatar
bluenoser bluenoser is offline
hi
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 630
How do you know it's not the Bayer's Rd. crane? That would be my guess, or else maybe some sort of condo building in Mount Royal.

Actually, you're also pointed at Russell Lake from that spot but that's a bit of a stretch.

Last edited by bluenoser; Aug 5, 2010 at 5:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1517  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 4:55 PM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,769
Does anyone else think that McCluskey would run for Mayor? Should she run for Mayor? I wasn't around much during her run with Dartmouth. How was she at the job then?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1518  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 5:24 PM
sdm sdm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstaleness View Post
Does anyone else think that McCluskey would run for Mayor? Should she run for Mayor? I wasn't around much during her run with Dartmouth. How was she at the job then?
Her job in dartmouth as mayor was exceptional in many peoples eyes.

She be the hurricane hazzel of Atlantic Canada, as they are both close in age i believe.

that said, i doubt she will run for mayor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1519  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 5:37 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstaleness View Post
I can't believe I'm asking this but I just couldn't figure out what Crane I was looking at. When coming in on the 103 just as the exit for St. Margaret's Bay Rd/Lakeside there is a crane directly straight ahead. It's not the bayers rd crane and I can't see it being the Trillium crane. Am I wrong? Would the Trillium be visable from out there?? Feeling really dumb but it didn't look red and white like the Trill.
Looking at the angle I would also have to guess 6955 Bayers Road unless one of the approved projects has gone ahead without anyone else noticing. Judging by the angle if that were the case it could be Craigmore or Bayview.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1520  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 5:43 PM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,769
That's kind of what I was thinking. Craigmore. I was at the Scotiabank on Chebucto yesterday but didn't notice any cranes in the distance so I don't think its that. It's not Bayers rd because the direction at which the driver is facing is away from that site. When I drive it again I'll pay more attention. For now I'm going to go with Russell Lake. It is a long distance but remember how big the Mount Royal Crane used to look coming off the MacKay Halifax bound.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:59 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.