HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #15161  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 3:25 PM
jonny golden jonny golden is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 2,451
As a resident of the greater Moncton area, I'm rooting for Saint John. I see a lot of potential, and I hope there are developers who will take advantage of what Saint John has to offer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15162  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 3:29 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
Well, you have a point… with Saint John’s dearth of mid rise and high rise residential developments, more people in Moncton may already have “water views” from their apartments, or will soon enough.

Moncton’s clearly doing something right, while Saint John is lagging behind. Saint John’s only 15 storey or taller apartment building was built in 1973, and who knows when the 19 storey Fundy Quay tower actually gets built…

It’s a shame, because Saint John has much more spectacular waterfront scenery to behold, in both the Bay of Fundy and the Saint John/Kennebecasis river valley.
Can you see Shediac bay from the three sisters? I’m sure you’ll see it from the 30 story building. Also, as someone who lives a couple hundred metres from the bay with a direct view of water, I can assure you almost every day I can see the bay without fog. Plus we have zero mosquitos
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15163  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 3:36 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
At least you can see the river from your apartment balcony in Moncton.

In SJ, you have to settle for the foghorn,

I am joking by the way. Don't be so brittle.
Would be awesome if Moncton had an elongated park one block wide that stretches the whole length of downtown area below Main St - then develop high rises off of that to give it the feel of King’s Square South in Saint John. It would really anchor the area where the river doesn’t due to Assomption making it feel a bit disconnected. But probably very complicated due to number of property owners. Just from maps it looks like a blank canvass which is unique to have for a larger city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15164  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 3:53 PM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is offline
New Brunswick
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 749
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
Can you see Shediac bay from the three sisters? I’m sure you’ll see it from the 30 story building. Also, as someone who lives a couple hundred metres from the bay with a direct view of water, I can assure you almost every day I can see the bay without fog. Plus we have zero mosquitos
It would take around 40 storeys (and the view would be marginal at best), building closer to the coast, or building at an area of higher elevation.


Last edited by EnvisionSaintJohn; Aug 22, 2024 at 4:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15165  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 3:54 PM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is offline
New Brunswick
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 749
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonny golden View Post
As a resident of the greater Moncton area, I'm rooting for Saint John. I see a lot of potential, and I hope there are developers who will take advantage of what Saint John has to offer.
Appreciate hearing that. Saint John could certainly benefit from trying to emulate Moncton’s strategy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15166  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 4:25 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 1,367
Getting back to the proposal to add 2 ice surfaces at the Fieldhouse. (Good article on this in this morning's TJ BTW)

I'm a little confused. The city website suggests they have 3 operating rinks (Gorman, Murrey and Hurley) Is the LBR run independently of the city?

If the three city rinks named are getting past their useful life why is the proposal to replace 3 rinks with 2? Do we have an overcapacity in terms of ice surfaces as things are?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15167  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 5:43 PM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is offline
New Brunswick
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 749
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
Getting back to the proposal to add 2 ice surfaces at the Fieldhouse. (Good article on this in this morning's TJ BTW)

I'm a little confused. The city website suggests they have 3 operating rinks (Gorman, Murrey and Hurley) Is the LBR run independently of the city?

If the three city rinks named are getting past their useful life why is the proposal to replace 3 rinks with 2? Do we have an overcapacity in terms of ice surfaces as things are?
We definitely don’t have an overcapacity… ice time is still quite scarce. Barry Ogden is the only councillor who seemed to have anything sensible to say about the situation when it was announced at the council meeting… he was pretty emphatic that we shouldn’t be shutting down any rinks as a result of this new two rink facility, and that the city should look at building a similar facility on the West Side to replace the Murray.

Six ice surfaces operated by the city really isn’t that much taking into account the population of the bedroom communities who probably use them more than city residents as is, since more of their kids are in recreational hockey leagues than families in the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15168  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 5:48 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
Getting back to the proposal to add 2 ice surfaces at the Fieldhouse. (Good article on this in this morning's TJ BTW)

I'm a little confused. The city website suggests they have 3 operating rinks (Gorman, Murrey and Hurley) Is the LBR run independently of the city?

If the three city rinks named are getting past their useful life why is the proposal to replace 3 rinks with 2? Do we have an overcapacity in terms of ice surfaces as things are?
Is it possible new rink would have more available hours to book because run by YMCA? Td station factor in?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15169  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 5:53 PM
TitleRequired TitleRequired is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 420
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
We definitely don’t have an overcapacity… ice time is still quite scarce. Barry Ogden is the only councillor who seemed to have anything sensible to say about the situation when it was announced at the council meeting… he was pretty emphatic that we shouldn’t be shutting down any rinks as a result of this new two rink facility, and that the city should look at building a similar facility on the West Side to replace the Murray.

Six ice surfaces operated by the city really isn’t that much taking into account the population of the bedroom communities who probably use them more than city residents as is, since more of their kids are in recreational hockey leagues than families in the city.
Barry has an interesting point. To extrapolate; at what scale should the rinks be at?

global
national
city/region
neighbourhood

street/project
household/family
individual

Should rinks be allocated to the city scale, with a big box store approach, or should consideration be placed at having them at a ward or neighborhood level.

Previously they seem to have been allocated to the smaller scale; Milledgeville, West Side etc. The new model seems to mimic the mega facility model.

For smaller towns the one facility makes sense from both a population and demand perspective. For SJ I'm unsure, provided the non insignificant population on the west side.

Barry is right to champion this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15170  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 6:32 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 36,529
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
We definitely don’t have an overcapacity… ice time is still quite scarce. Barry Ogden is the only councillor who seemed to have anything sensible to say about the situation when it was announced at the council meeting… he was pretty emphatic that we shouldn’t be shutting down any rinks as a result of this new two rink facility, and that the city should look at building a similar facility on the West Side to replace the Murray.

Six ice surfaces operated by the city really isn’t that much taking into account the population of the bedroom communities who probably use them more than city residents as is, since more of their kids are in recreational hockey leagues than families in the city.
How many ice surfaces in total in Saint John?

In metro Moncton we have:

Moncton - Superior Propane Centre (4 surfaces)
Moncton - Coliseum (1 surface)
Moncton - Kay Arena (1 surface)
Moncton - Avenir Centre (1 surface)
Moncton - J. Louis Levesque (1 surface)
Dieppe - Uniplex (2 surfaces)
Dieppe - Arthur J. Leblanc (2 surfaces)
Riverview - Byron Dobson (2 surfaces)

Total 14 ice surfaces.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15171  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 6:51 PM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is offline
New Brunswick
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 749
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
How many ice surfaces in total in Saint John?

In metro Moncton we have:

Moncton - Superior Propane Centre (4 surfaces)
Moncton - Coliseum (1 surface)
Moncton - Kay Arena (1 surface)
Moncton - Avenir Centre (1 surface)
Moncton - J. Louis Levesque (1 surface)
Dieppe - Uniplex (2 surfaces)
Dieppe - Arthur J. Leblanc (2 surfaces)
Riverview - Byron Dobson (2 surfaces)

Total 14 ice surfaces.
Including TD station 5 within the city proper, then another 5 ice surfaces in Quispamsis, Rothesay, Grand Bay, and Hampton.

The city’s report that they used to justify shutting down my neighbourhood’s arena, the Hilton Belyea, stated that SJ had too many rinks, and that 3.5 would be enough, excluding TD Station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15172  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 7:20 PM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is offline
New Brunswick
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 749
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitleRequired View Post
Barry has an interesting point. To extrapolate; at what scale should the rinks be at?

global
national
city/region
neighbourhood

street/project
household/family
individual

Should rinks be allocated to the city scale, with a big box store approach, or should consideration be placed at having them at a ward or neighborhood level.

Previously they seem to have been allocated to the smaller scale; Milledgeville, West Side etc. The new model seems to mimic the mega facility model.

For smaller towns the one facility makes sense from both a population and demand perspective. For SJ I'm unsure, provided the non insignificant population on the west side.

Barry is right to champion this.
There’s still something to be said for maintaining smaller, neighbourhood scale arenas that are still standing, but need some refurbishment, as they are important third places in the community.

This new, two surface facility is definitely a step in the right direction, but another multi surface rink on the West Side would definitely make sense, too, as it will also draw on Grand Bay and the areas to the southwest of the city. Heck, it would still draw on people out as far as Quispamsis and beyond, as ice time really is that scarce.

Assuming another two surface on the West Side would replace the Murray Arena, it would eventually bring the total to 12 ice surfaces in the region, excluding TD station.

Barry’s definitely got the right idea, but the planners at the City don’t seem to care about the West Side nearly as much as he does. I won’t be holding my breath for the city to support a second multi ice surface facility to be constructed on the West Side anytime soon, but you never know.

____

Hopefully the mayoral race attracts some higher calibre candidates next time, but the city council is in even more need of a shakeup, as they seem to be even more consequential than the mayor. I like that Mayor Reardon doesn’t get bogged down in the comment section on FB, like Don Darling did, but he seemed to care more about big picture stuff more than she does. Barry Ogden cares more than both of them combined, and he’s basically not even on Facebook at all! (Bonus!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15173  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 7:31 PM
darkharbour darkharbour is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
Including TD station 5 within the city proper, then another 5 ice surfaces in Quispamsis, Rothesay, Grand Bay, and Hampton.

The city’s report that they used to justify shutting down my neighbourhood’s arena, the Hilton Belyea, stated that SJ had too many rinks, and that 3.5 would be enough, excluding TD Station.
That's not quite right, we have 12 ice surfaces in the Fundy Region since the Belyea closed, with a new one under construction in Hampton right now (although it will be replacing the older Hampton arena eventually).

The number quoted in PlaySJ was accurate for the time, it is understood in recreation studies and urban planning that a population service level of 1:12,000-1:15,000 is acceptable for ice surfaces in Canada. As a city and region are growing a lot now compared to the stagnant population then, so even just holding the current number of ice surfaces is probably the way to go, otherwise we are spending far too much on one type of recreation and will probably end up underserving another - often ones with larger user numbers but less influential ones - in order to balance budgets.

You also brought up one of the other issues, which is that a lot of users of SJ facilities come from other municipalities, which is why NB has a regional facilities model through the RSCs. TD Station and the Aquatic Centre are great examples of those shared regional facilities whose cost is distributed amongst all the member communities in the Fundy Region, but getting the political will to add to that count is very challenging, and not something many elected officials from bedroom communities are willing to take on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15174  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 8:36 PM
DyAm00394 DyAm00394 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Saint John, N.B
Posts: 1,482
Over 25 acres of vacant land went on the market today at 534 Rothesay Avenue. Asking for $3,700,000.

Quote:
“High visibility prime location in the center of retail shopping, restaurants, auto dealerships and big box stores. With approximately 855 on Rothesay Avenue and 328 on McAllister Drive, this 25+ acre property will scale to meet all your business needs. Zoning is a combination of Corridor Commercial and Regional Commercial - allowing for many options including Automotive, Restaurant, Retail, Warehouse, Accommodations and many more. Located only 1.8 kms from main Route 1 Highway exit on double wide roadways, easy access for shipping and receiving. 18km/15 minute drive to Saint John Airport. Saint John Transit Route, very close proximity to the Irving Oil Fieldhouse and the proposed location of the new multipurpose recreational facility!! (27424148)”.
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/2...OevWUm2VVtZwxQ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15175  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 8:39 PM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is offline
New Brunswick
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 749
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkharbour View Post
That's not quite right, we have 12 ice surfaces in the Fundy Region since the Belyea closed, with a new one under construction in Hampton right now (although it will be replacing the older Hampton arena eventually).

The number quoted in PlaySJ was accurate for the time, it is understood in recreation studies and urban planning that a population service level of 1:12,000-1:15,000 is acceptable for ice surfaces in Canada. As a city and region are growing a lot now compared to the stagnant population then, so even just holding the current number of ice surfaces is probably the way to go, otherwise we are spending far too much on one type of recreation and will probably end up underserving another - often ones with larger user numbers but less influential ones - in order to balance budgets.

You also brought up one of the other issues, which is that a lot of users of SJ facilities come from other municipalities, which is why NB has a regional facilities model through the RSCs. TD Station and the Aquatic Centre are great examples of those shared regional facilities whose cost is distributed amongst all the member communities in the Fundy Region, but getting the political will to add to that count is very challenging, and not something many elected officials from bedroom communities are willing to take on.
There’s five in the city proper including TD station right? Then two in Quispamsis, one in Rothesay, one in Grand Bay, and one or two in Hampton if you want to count one soon to closed and one under construction… are you counting the Rothesay Commons Outdoor rink or St. Martins? Counting either would be a bit of a stretch.

I think we can strive for better than acceptable, as ice hockey is Canada’s national winter sport, and figure skating is also one of our biggest winter sports. There’s a notable difference in commitment to ice rinks here in Saint John compared to Western Canada where I grew up. There’s a lot of people who seem to be hockey fans in Saint John, but the level of skating and hockey talent here is noticeably below the Canadian average, and I really think that has a lot to do with the lack of financial commitment to ice rinks. Saint John should have had a multiplex arena built decades ago. In Saskatchewan, people would have protested the situation with the Belyea. I don’t know if it’s just the lackadaisical maritime attitude or what, but I really think it’s something more specific to NB and SJ specifically, as evidenced by how few NBers, and even fewer Saint Johners have made it to the NHL in recent years.

As for the bedroom communities paying their fair share towards the recreational ice rinks in Saint John that their residents use in large number, that’s just pure selfishness and gas lighting (like when people like Nancy Grant or Libby O’hara fake out outrage at the suggestion that their towns aren’t already paying their fair share)

It’s pathetic the city didn’t go through with the plan for recreation cards for the residents of the bedroom communities, all because the president of the hotel association of Saint John, Paulette Hicks, a resident of Quispamsis, orchestrated a one time payment of $60,000 to the City to “buy time” for the constituent communities of the Saint John Region to work out an agreement for a regional ice strategy. Hicks then went on to become the first CEO of Envision Saint John, but seemingly did nothing in her new position to get the “towns by the bay” to cooperate with the City on a regional ice strategy. Recreation cards would have at least been a solution that might had led to the bedroom communities actually agreeing to cooperate financially on a regional ice strategy.

I think it’s abundantly clear that the bedroom communities are never going to willingly contribute a fair share to the city, no matter how much SJ improves its financial situation… I think it will take forced amalgamation from the province to bring about any type of real fairness here in the “Fundy Region”. I think this will inevitably happen, especially as more Canadians move here from other cities in Canada where the vast majority of the CMA resides in a single municipality, and as more and more older and conservative people die off.

I’ll never get why the KV elite are so committed to keeping up the separation farce, as it’s not just holding the urban centre back, it’s holding back the whole region. Imo, suburbs are only as good as the city at their centre. I think they fully understand this too, they’re just selfish and more concerned about keeping their taxes low. If comprehensive tax reform was ever realized, the entire region could adopt the same tax rate as Rothesay, or go even lower. I really do love Saint John and think the surrounding communities have a lot to offer too, but until we actually come up with solutions to fundamentally improve the dynamic between the communities of the region, there’s more to complain about than be proud of. I’ve yet to hear a better solution to improve this dynamic than region wide amalgamation, but I’m also willing to listen to alternatives to amalgamation… I’m just skeptical they won’t be designed in a way to maintain the fundamental inequity that currently exists here in the SJ region.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15176  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 8:54 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 1,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
There’s five in the city proper including TD station right? Then two in Quispamsis, one in Rothesay, one in Grand Bay, and one or two in Hampton if you want to count one soon to closed and one under construction… are you counting the Rothesay Commons Outdoor rink or St. Martins? Counting either would be a bit of a stretch.

I think we can strive for better than acceptable, as ice hockey is Canada’s national winter sport, and figure skating is also one of our biggest winter sports. There’s a notable difference in commitment to ice rinks here in Saint John compared to Western Canada where I grew up. There’s a lot of people who seem to be hockey fans in Saint John, but the level of skating and hockey talent here is noticeably below the Canadian average, and I really think that has a lot to do with the lack of financial commitment to ice rinks. Saint John should have had a multiplex arena built decades ago. In Saskatchewan, people would have protested the situation with the Belyea. I don’t know if it’s just the lackadaisical maritime attitude or what, but I really think it’s something more specific to NB and SJ specifically, as evidenced by how few NBers, and even fewer Saint Johners have made it to the NHL in recent years.

As for the bedroom communities paying their fair share towards the recreational ice rinks in Saint John that their residents use in large number, that’s just pure selfishness and gas lighting (like when people like Nancy Grant or Libby O’hara fake out outrage at the suggestion that their towns aren’t already paying their fair share)

It’s pathetic the city didn’t go through with the plan for recreation cards for the residents of the bedroom communities, all because the president of the hotel association of Saint John, Paulette Hicks, a resident of Quispamsis, orchestrated a one time payment of $60,000 to the City to “buy time” for the constituent communities of the Saint John Region to work out an agreement for a regional ice strategy. Hicks then went on to become the first CEO of Envision Saint John, but seemingly did nothing in her new position to get the “towns by the bay” to cooperate with the City on a regional ice strategy. Recreation cards would have at least been a solution that might had led to the bedroom communities actually agreeing to cooperate financially on a regional ice strategy.

I think it’s abundantly clear that the bedroom communities are never going to willingly contribute a fair share to the city, no matter how much SJ improves its financial situation… I think it will take forced amalgamation from the province to bring about any type of real fairness here in the “Fundy Region”. I think this will inevitably happen, especially as more Canadians move here from other cities in Canada where the vast majority of the CMA resides in a single municipality, and as more and more older and conservative people die off.

I’ll never get why the KV elite are so committed to keeping up the separation farce, as it’s not just holding the urban centre back, it’s holding back the whole region. Imo, suburbs are only as good as the city at their centre. I think they fully understand this too, they’re just selfish and more concerned about keeping their taxes low. If comprehensive tax reform was ever realized, the entire region could adopt the same tax rate as Rothesay, or go even lower. I really do love Saint John and think the surrounding communities have a lot to offer too, but until we actually come up with solutions to fundamentally improve the dynamic between the communities of the region, there’s more to complain about than be proud of. I’ve yet to hear a better solution to improve this dynamic than region wide amalgamation, but I’m also willing to listen to alternatives to amalgamation… I’m just skeptical they won’t be designed in a way to maintain the fundamental inequity that currently exists here in the SJ region.
So, if the bedroom communities have about the same number of rinks (or more) as SJ should kids from Saint John have to pay when their team has a game in Quispamsis?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15177  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2024, 9:14 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by DyAm00394 View Post
Over 25 acres of vacant land went on the market today at 534 Rothesay Avenue. Asking for $3,700,000.



https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/2...OevWUm2VVtZwxQ
That’s as wet as wetland can be. Sometimes looks like the Everglades
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15178  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2024, 11:37 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is offline
New Brunswick
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 749
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
So, if the bedroom communities have about the same number of rinks (or more) as SJ should kids from Saint John have to pay when their team has a game in Quispamsis?
If 80% of the highest income earners in the region worked in Quispamsis and lived in Saint John, and Quispamsis was starved of property tax revenue to maintain the Qplex… yeah absolutely.

But that’s not the case, the opposite of that is the reality, and thus why the recreation cards idea actually made sense. The city should have reimplemented the cards once that $60,000 ran out, which was not even enough to run a single rink for 6 months.

There’s been no movement from the bedroom communities to increase their share of funding towards ice rinks in Saint John since then, so the city should just go back to implementing recreation fees for out of town residents that use City of Saint John run rinks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15179  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2024, 9:48 PM
thefishingnut thefishingnut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Quispamsis, NB
Posts: 256
4 indoor rinks in the KV (you missed RNS, which is used for minor hockey) along with 2 outdoor surfaces. 5 indoor rinks in Saint John. Certainly there is some spillage back and forth of use, but I doubt it is significant enough into Saint John from the KV to be bothered with. Or are you so sure that Saint John residents don't also use rinks in the valley that this is a 1 way issue?

I don't pay attention to Moncton, but do they have the same discussions about putting non-resident tolls on bridges and streets from Riverview and Dieppe into Moncton? And non-resident recreation cards so that a 6 year old out skating with his friends can be properly charged?

If you want to fix the property tax situation in Saint John, then get the industrial property tax issue fixed. You're not in a bad financial situation because some kid from the KV goes skating at Harbour Station without being charged more than the kid from Millidgeville. You're in a bad financial situation because the Province screws over the city on the industrial tax base.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15180  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2024, 10:09 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 1,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefishingnut View Post
4 indoor rinks in the KV (you missed RNS, which is used for minor hockey) along with 2 outdoor surfaces. 5 indoor rinks in Saint John. Certainly there is some spillage back and forth of use, but I doubt it is significant enough into Saint John from the KV to be bothered with. Or are you so sure that Saint John residents don't also use rinks in the valley that this is a 1 way issue?

I don't pay attention to Moncton, but do they have the same discussions about putting non-resident tolls on bridges and streets from Riverview and Dieppe into Moncton? And non-resident recreation cards so that a 6 year old out skating with his friends can be properly charged?

If you want to fix the property tax situation in Saint John, then get the industrial property tax issue fixed. You're not in a bad financial situation because some kid from the KV goes skating at Harbour Station without being charged more than the kid from Millidgeville. You're in a bad financial situation because the Province screws over the city on the industrial tax base.

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:24 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.