Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734
Belyea proposal discussed in this TJ article
https://tj.news/saint-john-south/unique-...-ex-arena-raises-conflict-concerns-mayor.
Saint John Mayor Donna Reardon says the fact the proponent is a sitting councillor raises questions around conflict of interest, saying “to me, it’s not kosher.”
Coun Killan is quoted as saying she is recusing herself because she is in a relationship with Harris. However the article reports she has been active online in support of the project.
|
Thanks for posting, here's quite the cute little tid bit from the mayor and two councillors including Joanna Killen.
I get a kick out of these comments. The Mayor doesn't want to comment other than saying it's possibly a conflict of interest for Brent Harris and Killen. While, Sullivan says he hasn't even bothered to read it

(not to interfere with city staff evaluating it) I call BS... he and any other councillor could read about the other proposals without interfering with city staff.
But, I at least like what councillor Sullivan said, that he's "hopeful" to sell the land to to a good project, which based on the metric given, should be the project that pays the most for the land, provides the greatest number of housing units, and can generate property tax revenue.
While Joanna Killen aptly describes the whole process being a "lead balloon dropped on the neighbourhood"...which is what this whole thing basically feels like already, although, I'd never would have thought to use such a doomsday metaphor.

but good on her for evoking such horrendous imagery for what this project could be on the future of her old neighbourhood. Because, that's exactly what this project, if approved, could do the Bayshore neighbourhood: hold back a huge, six acre property from its development potential, AND have the potential to be a far bigger disturbance than the seasonal winter homeless centre that was very much like a lead balloon or nuclear bomb of problems that was dropped on the neighbourhood. If anyone actually believes it will only last seven or ten years, I think they are incredibly naive.
Brent Harris claims its the speed of his project that matters the most, yet, his project will generate very little tax revenue compared to a significant residential development, by the very metric the city is using to assess these proposals. The lack of revenue potential should basically disqualify Brent's proposal from the get go. It would be insane to risk the future development potential of 6 acres of beach adjacent real estate to provide 40 transitional units that are only supposed to last ten years, but that we all know could be there far longer than that!
The problem is, nothing concrete is known about the other proposals other than some vague information mentioned publicly by a few other councillors on Facebook, and some downright misinformation from Brent Harris himself about the NIMBY potential of the other units, along with a bunch of misguided rants about how new residential developments are a big part of the problem.

The guy has been absolutely disrespectful, combative, and publicly dismissive with his West Side constituents online, and even brags how he doesn't shy away from conflict—regarding the pushback he's getting from West Siders on Facebook. The tool library has even linked to a petition in favour of the proposal.
____
I'll ask again, do you or anyone else have any suggestions on how to effectively counteract what Brent Harris is trying to inflict on our neighbourhood with this proposal? As I saw you commented in the Moncton Gateway Tower thread... letters of support are generally more impactful than letters of opposition. We don't have a lot to go on here regarding the other proposals, but could some sort of generalized letter of support for residential development be helpful?
Brent Harris has already tried to put the scare into people about the alternative proposals, about traffic, parking, and even the privacy angle...
TitleRequired
linked to an oppositional letter writing campaign that was successful for Fredericton residents in their efforts to oppose a shelter from operating near an established residential neighbourhood... I think this type of campaign could be helpful regarding the Belyea.
Could a letter campaign supporting new, residential development also be helpful in convincing the city to approve the other proposals? People don't want to take this sitting down after the quagmire of the Belyea Area winter homeless shelter that was unleashed on us... More than that, I just think there's so much more potential for that large property than Brent's really short sighted proposal. It's a property with potential for hundreds of ocean view units with even a few generic six storey apartment buildings... Brent Harris proposal would absolutely squander that potential.
So again, if anyone has any suggestions on how West Siders or any other interested people from the Saint John Region could effectively oppose Brent's really bad plan for our neighbourhood... myself and many others would appreciate the advice and ideas! Thanks very much.