Quote:
Originally Posted by Doady
Look at these numbers. Is the lack of rail or lack of funding from higher levels of government really what's holding back transit in Hamilton?
|
Lack of political will. Transit is the priority city council loves to talk about, but more often than not the talk hasn't turned into action.
Plus transit is still area-rated. When the region was amalgamated into one city (from 6 municipalities in a two-tier government) concessions were made about the funding model for certain services, re: what property tax rates the former suburban municipalities paid compared to the "old" city of Hamilton. Area-rating has been removed for most of them in the 20 years since amalgamation happened, but not for transit.
Environment Hamilton has a good summary of the issue.
This means the property taxes generated in the suburban wards do not contribute to the transit budget at the same rate as those of the "Hamilton" wards -- the "suburbs" only pay for the service they get. But it hinders transit growth in those wards,
where much of the residential growth has occurred in the last two decades, because their councillors do not want to increase the tax rate for transit to pay for more service. "Hamilton" councillors have no incentive to direct more funds to the suburban areas to increase service, even though that may benefit the entire city's transit network and demand, because based on the rating scheme their constituents would pay relatively more for the improvements than the residents who will get the new service.
And some of the councillors argue against transit investments in the "old city" on the basis that it doesn't benefit their constituents. This is especially true of the lower city, where density and transit ridership are higher. It's been a core argument used by LRT opponents.
It's a broken system.
By contrast, nobody uses the same argument when a road improvement is proposed, anywhere in the city. It is frustrating.