HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1481  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 1:38 PM
Los_Lobo's Avatar
Los_Lobo Los_Lobo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dixon, CA (Sacramento ??)
Posts: 273
More info

This is the expanded story in the Bee this morning. It gives more information than the previous Bee article.

Towers project on hold

Construction stops as developer Saca seeks more cash to pay bills.
By Mary Lynne Vellinga and Jon Ortiz -

Last Updated 12:34 am PST Friday, January 12, 2007
Story appeared in MAIN NEWS section, Page A1

Construction on the 53-story Towers project at Third Street and Capitol Mall in downtown Sacramento has come to a halt after a pile driving company, a former contractor and the buildings' architect filed liens against developer John Saca. City officials, concerned about having a hole at the gateway to Capitol Mall, say they support Saca and his quest to get more money from CalPERS to continue construction. Sacramento Bee/Michael A. Jones


Construction has stopped on downtown Sacramento's most ambitious development project ever -- two 53-story condominium and hotel towers planned for the foot of Capitol Mall.

In a sign of developer John Saca's ongoing financial struggle to build his skyscrapers, several contractors filed liens against him in the past week for unpaid bills totaling $7.3 million for such items as architectural work and pile driving.

Hit with millions of dollars in cost overruns, Saca is seeking additional financing. Without it, he likely won't be able to close on his $375 million construction loan from Deutsche Bank.

Eric Rasmusson, a spokesman for Saca, called the work stoppage "a short temporary regroup" while the developer tries to reconstruct a workable budget and secure his construction financing.

"John has been working every single day on this project for over three years and would not continue to do so if he didn't think there was sufficient reason to do so," Rasmusson said. "We're all confident that this project remains on everybody's hot list."

Saca is seeking a greater infusion of cash from the California Public Employees' Retirement System, which had already agreed to invest $100 million in the project. The pension fund hasn't said yes yet.

"Mr. Saca has advised us that he's closing down the project to reorganize its financial structure and obtain additional financing," said Ted Eliopoulos, who joined the giant state pension fund this week as its new head of real estate investment.

"He is looking to CalPERS and to other sources as well," Eliopoulos said. "We'd like to be as helpful as possible to understand the financial issues that he has raised and to ensure that our investment is protected."

As to whether the pension fund would put in more money, Eliopoulos said, "We'll evaluate it and complete our due diligence."

Eliopoulos said the Towers project has been a significant focus for him in his first few days on the job.

He said he's been "working with Mr. Saca very closely on a daily basis" and also has spoken with Sacramento City Manager Ray Kerridge.

After Saca complained that construction costs on the $500 million project had skyrocketed by more than $100 million, the Sacramento City Council in October approved an $11 million subsidy for the hotel portion of towers.

City officials, concerned that a marquee project may falter, are "doing everything we can to support John in his discussions with CalPERS," said John Dangberg, the city's assistant city manager for economic development.

"We believe they've made a commitment to the project, and we want them to follow through with their commitment and their investment on that site," Dangberg said. "This is a very important project to the city of Sacramento, particularly since a building has been torn down and there are piles in the ground. We want it to proceed, and we think it will proceed. We're not interested in having a hole at the gateway to the Capitol Mall."

For months, crews at the Towers construction site have been driving piles deep into the relatively unstable ground of the site at Capitol Mall and Third Street to support the 600-foot towers, which would be the tallest residential structures on the West Coast.

Many of the piles hit solid ground at different depths, leaving a hodgepodge of different length piles sticking out the ground. Saca previously told The Bee these piles will have to be sawed off -- an unexpected expense.

On Jan. 5, the pile driving company, Oakley-based Foundation Constructors Inc., filed a $5.5 million construction lien on the Saca project with the Sacramento County Recorder's Office.

A manager with the company, who asked not to be named because of ongoing negotiations, said the company filed the lien to "protect its position" in case Saca does not restart construction. He said the $5.5 million was owed for work already performed.

Also filing liens last week was the former contractor on the project, Turner Construction -- whom Saca recently said he was replacing with another firm -- and the buildings' architect, Mul-vaney G2 of Bellevue, Wash. Officials at neither of those companies could be reached for comment.

Saca's announcement in October 2004 that he would build the ambitious high-rise residential project was greeted with skepticism and disbelief in the Sacramento real estate community. But the developer -- with no previous high-rise experience -- surprised skeptics by landing Cal-PERS as an investor and obtaining a commitment from Deutsche Bank for construction financing.

While his sales have slowed in recent months with the slump in the residential market, Saca is very close to meeting the Deutsche Bank requirement that he presell 400 units. According to Hanley Wood Market Intelligence, a Costa Mesa-based housing analyst, he had collected non-refundable deposits on 383 units as of November.

Many of these buyers are enthusiastic champions of the Towers as a way to help boost the fortunes of downtown Sacramento.

Steve Ayers has already bought one unit in the Towers, and said he intends to buy another. "As a buyer, I have no worry at all about the project getting built," said the steel company owner. "John Saca is a very resourceful individual."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1482  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 3:19 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Los_Lobo View Post

"He is looking to CalPERS and to other sources as well," Eliopoulos said. "We'd like to be as helpful as possible to understand the financial issues that he has raised and to ensure that our investment is protected."

As to whether the pension fund would put in more money, Eliopoulos said, "We'll evaluate it and complete our due diligence."

Eliopoulos said the Towers project has been a significant focus for him in his first few days on the job. He said he's been "working with Mr. Saca very closely on a daily basis" and also has spoken with Sacramento City Manager Ray Kerridge.

City officials, concerned that a marquee project may falter, are "doing everything we can to support John in his discussions with CalPERS," said John Dangberg, the city's assistant city manager for economic development.


"We believe they've made a commitment to the project, and we want them to follow through with their commitment and their investment on that site," Dangberg said. "This is a very important project to the city of Sacramento, particularly since a building has been torn down and there are piles in the ground. We want it to proceed, and we think it will proceed. We're not interested in having a hole at the gateway to the Capitol Mall."

I like the fact that the city, Saca and Cal Pers are talking. That's a good sign and relieves some of the anxiety... I'm sure Cal Pers doesn't want this incomplete project hanging over their heads. Especially in the Capital City just blocks from their HQ...

We'll see.
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1483  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 4:44 PM
POGO POGO is offline
Mental Midget
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Highlands
Posts: 96
About eight months have passed since Saca started signing contracts. Those contracts reportedly required the towers to be topped out in two years. It will be AT LEAST two months before work starts up again. That only gives him 14 months to finish the pile driving, pour the foundation mat slab, and go up 53 stories. I don't see how it can happen.

Now that the word is out that Saca has not been paying his bills, there will probably be a lot of subcontractors that will not want to work on this project for fear of not getting paid. There is still way too much work out there where people do pay their bills for the subcontractors to mess around with this project, even if it is a signature, huge project for Sacramento.

Once that topping out deadline comes and goes, buyers are free to demand their money back. (Hopefully the DRE requires that the money be deposited in escrow pending completion of the project so that there is money there to be refunded). That will really cause some problems if the project is under construction. Obviously CalPers and Deutche Bank can see this too. Therefore I don't see this project starting up again any time soon. Hey, but what the heck. The City could use a swimming pool on Capitol Mall.

Let the flaming begin!
__________________
To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also dream: not only plan, but also believe. I believe I will have another beer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1484  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 5:01 PM
william william is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 100
While we would all prefer a flawless construction process, it doesn't always work that way. in fact, it never works out that way.

Work on San Diego's Petco Park also stopped after construction started when money ran out. For months, the site was a brutal scar downtown while additional funds were secured. Obviously, the funds were found (they were private funds) and construction resumed.

Saca and Calpers have too much riding on this project. Saca financially: and Calpers has an image of aggressive investing in California's urban areas. Saca won't make the money he'd hoped to from this. Calpers will get its return at the expense of Saca. But both Saca and Calpers will forever have this stellar project as a prime example of what they can do. They will use this to get and justify future opportunities. This is something they both want.

These things can and do happen, even on a $500 million dollar projects like Petco Park or Sacramento Towers. They get built anyway.

What's pathetic is the glee with which some Sacramentans have recieved this news.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1485  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 5:24 PM
reggiesquared reggiesquared is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 78
I wouldn't worry about this project. This is a memo going around here at CalPERS and it sounds optimistic in my opinion. CalPERS has billions. Giving saca more money for more control is a drop in the bucket for this financial behemoth:


Subject:
CalPERS and The Sacramento Towers



Background: As you may recall, in April 2006 CalPERS made an investment in The Towers -- twin hotel and condominium skyscrapers planned at Third Street and Capitol Mall by local developer John Saca.



We have learned that the Sacramento Bee is expected to report on Friday, January 12, 2007 that John Saca is stopping work to reorganize its financial structure, obtain additional financing, and complete construction loan requirements. Unanticipated construction costs and the need for additional capital will be reported as the reasons for the delay.



We expect this study to generate media attention and possible questions from our members and the public.



CalPERS Response: CalPERS real estate staff will be working with John Saca to help identify additional sources of required capital to move the construction to the next phase.



Please feel free to contact me at 795-3850 for any additional information on media and public coverage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1486  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 5:38 PM
william william is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by reggiesquared View Post
I wouldn't worry about this project. This is a memo going around here at CalPERS and it sounds optimistic in my opinion. CalPERS has billions. Giving saca more money for more control is a drop in the bucket for this financial behemoth:


Subject:
CalPERS and The Sacramento Towers



Background: As you may recall, in April 2006 CalPERS made an investment in The Towers -- twin hotel and condominium skyscrapers planned at Third Street and Capitol Mall by local developer John Saca.



We have learned that the Sacramento Bee is expected to report on Friday, January 12, 2007 that John Saca is stopping work to reorganize its financial structure, obtain additional financing, and complete construction loan requirements. Unanticipated construction costs and the need for additional capital will be reported as the reasons for the delay.



We expect this study to generate media attention and possible questions from our members and the public.



CalPERS Response: CalPERS real estate staff will be working with John Saca to help identify additional sources of required capital to move the construction to the next phase.



Please feel free to contact me at 795-3850 for any additional information on media and public coverage.

Now THAT is a great memo.
Thank you reggiesquared!

It's amazing how many things we learn on this board before the general public.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1487  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 5:39 PM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
Thanks for posting that Reggie. Like you said, sounds optimistic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1488  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 6:08 PM
arod74's Avatar
arod74 arod74 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: east Sac
Posts: 358
Quote:
Originally Posted by POGO View Post
Now that the word is out that Saca has not been paying his bills, there will probably be a lot of subcontractors that will not want to work on this project for fear of not getting paid. There is still way too much work out there where people do pay their bills for the subcontractors to mess around with this project, even if it is a signature, huge project for Sacramento.
I don't think it is fair to say Saca has not paid his bills. No one has stated that he has not payed on his obligations. I may be wrong but I think it is not uncommon for out going contractors and sub-contractors on a project to place a lien to protect their investments. There is too much momentum in this project and too many good partners(Bovis, Cal Pers, Deutsche Bank) for it not to continue

Quote:
Originally Posted by POGO View Post
Therefore I don't see this project starting up again any time soon. Hey, but what the heck. The City could use a swimming pool on Capitol Mall.
If your looking to swim on capitol mall Pogo then be patient, you will have your wish when this project done. Maybe someone will be nice and invite you up to the large pool and lounge area of the finished towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1489  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 6:31 PM
TowerDistrict's Avatar
TowerDistrict TowerDistrict is offline
my posse's on broadway
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in an LPCA occupied zone
Posts: 1,600
I'm still very optistic about this project, and I as william said - it really is pathetic how people use news like this to project their own personal negativity.

On the other hand though, the memo posted by reggie does NOT elude to the easiest route of this project moving forward. The way i read it, is that CalPERS will not be supplying additional funding to Saca, and that they are simply holding his hand while he figures it out for himself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by reggiesquared
CalPERS Response: CalPERS real estate staff will be working with John Saca to help identify additional sources of required capital to move the construction to the next phase.
"additional sources" means "somebody else" to me. Please correct me if I'm mistaken....
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------
Map of recent Sacramento developments
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1490  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 6:33 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by william View Post
While we would all prefer a flawless construction process, it doesn't always work that way. in fact, it never works out that way.

Work on San Diego's Petco Park also stopped after construction started when money ran out. For months, the site was a brutal scar downtown while additional funds were secured. Obviously, the funds were found (they were private funds) and construction resumed.
Good point william. I was just saying last night to a friend that situations like
this aren’t unique to Sacramento and typically a solution is found to finish
a project. Who would have thought Petco Park had hit the wall for a few
months unless you were a local in San Diego? I'm sure there are many other
examples of this around the county of the same situation.

I just hope Saca doe's not get pushed out of the project. If that doe's happen,
then the idea of him being able to get his other proposals started for downtown
will be a dream at best.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1491  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 7:00 PM
william william is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by TowerDistrict View Post
I'm still very optistic about this project, and I as william said - it really is pathetic how people use news like this to project their own personal negativity.

On the other hand though, the memo posted by reggie does NOT elude to the easiest route of this project moving forward. The way i read it, is that CalPERS will not be supplying additional funding to Saca, and that they are simply holding his hand while he figures it out for himself.



"additional sources" means "somebody else" to me. Please correct me if I'm mistaken....
Hmmmm.... I see your point. Quick - call him. He left a number. Call him right now TD. Let's get an answer.

Seriously, perhaps I was reading it with hopeful and optimistic eyes. We'll know soon enough.

Also, in reference to another post. Liens are far more common than most people realize and for precisely the reason stated - protection. When I first began my career, I'd receive a notice and begin to panic thinking I had forgotten to authorise payment for someone. I'm a firm believer in keeping everyone paid on time - you're going to need a favor down the road. But hell, some companies send Lien notices on a regular basis just to keep you interested. Not the case here, but not the catastrophe some would like us to believe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1492  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 7:14 PM
william william is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 100
Quote:
I just hope Saca doe's not get pushed out of the project. If that doe's happen,
then the idea of him being able to get his other proposals started for downtown
will be a dream at best.
That is an absolutely legitimate concern innov. I know of several projects where the original developer was ousted in order to complete (we just had the leading condo converter in SD get replaced on a project due to financing issues.). In some cases, a project has gone through three developers before completion. The present environment is ideal for that - especially on a project this size.

In my view, that would be an unmitigated tragedy. John Saca can never be thanked enough for what he has done for Sacramento. He has risked it all to create the kind of Sacramento we have all dreamt of. He may lose everything in pursuit of that dream. I implore Calpers to do everything to keep him leading this project forward. His impact on this town can never be understated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1493  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 7:25 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
Well I'm sure Cal Pers will be calling Deutsch Bank in on the discussions in order to nail down the financing. In other words Cal Pers tells Deutsch Bank, 'We'll commit to seeing this through with more of our money if you will guarantee the financing.'

Remember this is as much Cal Pers project as it is John Saca's; meaning Cal Pers will more than likely have no probelm getting the backing of Deutsch Bank as planned...


As far as Saca being pushed aside. (I honestly don't know)..

Cal Pers has over $230 billion investmernt portfolio and they may very well want to bring in their own people. It would probably hurt future large scale projects being proposed downtown by Saca, (not because he hasn't paid his bills) those companies are going to get paid. But because he may have a hard time convincing anyone in the future that he can in fact put up a residential highrise. Of course on the other hand, all of this experience will serve him well and one project doesn't necessarily mean the end of other projects... (See BCN)....
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1494  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 7:30 PM
TowerDistrict's Avatar
TowerDistrict TowerDistrict is offline
my posse's on broadway
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in an LPCA occupied zone
Posts: 1,600
i think Saca's bold marketing and openness towards the media (good or bad) is the major reason they've sold so many units. I also think that projects of this magnitude need a face attached to them to personify such a lofty and unprecedented development - just look at the giant protraits of Daniel Libeskind - Saca is the face for the Towers project. In my opinion, without him the project could be portayed as just a set of bank-owned monoliths.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------
Map of recent Sacramento developments
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1495  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 7:44 PM
snfenoc's Avatar
snfenoc snfenoc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Steve in East Sac
Posts: 1,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by innov8 View Post
Good point william. I was just saying last night to a friend that situations like
this aren’t unique to Sacramento and typically a solution is found to finish
a project.
I just hope the solution is not like CIM's 8-story solution to Dean Ingemanson's Metro Place issues.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1496  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 7:48 PM
TowerDistrict's Avatar
TowerDistrict TowerDistrict is offline
my posse's on broadway
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in an LPCA occupied zone
Posts: 1,600
at least they could market low-rise building as having the most stable foundation in all of sacramento.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------
Map of recent Sacramento developments
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1497  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 8:00 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento / San Antonio 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 5,994
I wouldn't worry too much about design changes or height adjustments.

I suspect that this project will either go forward as planned or not at all...

Just a hunch, but it's doubtful that Cal Pers is interested in going back for design changes and then through the political approval process once again...
__________________
Sacramento / San Antonio
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1498  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 8:25 PM
Phillip Phillip is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 562
A recurrent theme here is that 301 will go up, one way or another, because CalPERS needs to "protect their investment"....CalPERS will increase their funding "to protect their investment"....CalPERS will put pressure on Deutsche Bank "to protect their investment"...

What investment are we talking about? I didn't think any CalPERS money had been spent yet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1499  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 8:39 PM
william william is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phillip View Post
A recurrent theme here is that 301 will go up, one way or another, because CalPERS needs to "protect their investment"....CalPERS will increase their funding "to protect their investment"....CalPERS will put pressure on Deutsche Bank "to protect their investment"...

What investment are we talking about? I didn't think any CalPERS money had been spent yet.
Sorry Phillip, I've never said anything about Calpers doing this to "to protect its investment." I'm inclined to believe it'll do it because its leadership has an outstanding and exuberant vision for California's urban centers. One that has well-served its shareholders. Luckily, the leadership includes few pessimists.

Doubting is easy. Any fool can grumble "it'll never work." It takes brilliance, passion, optimism, dedication and vision to dream the impossible. It takes perseverance and cash to make the impossible come true.

Together, I think Saca and Calpers have it about covered.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1500  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 8:55 PM
Los_Lobo's Avatar
Los_Lobo Los_Lobo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dixon, CA (Sacramento ??)
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phillip View Post
A recurrent theme here is that 301 will go up, one way or another, because CalPERS needs to "protect their investment"....CalPERS will increase their funding "to protect their investment"....CalPERS will put pressure on Deutsche Bank "to protect their investment"...

What investment are we talking about? I didn't think any CalPERS money had been spent yet.
I was under the impression that Saca's been using the CalPERS money to date. I don't know where else he'd be getting the money for all the demo, drawings, sales staff/office, pilings and equipment so far, especially after spending $20 million for the lot. A previous SBJ article also mentioned Saca saying he had enough equity to carry him into 2007. Is there other equity in the project besides CalPERS that could possibly front the project so far?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:52 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.