Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5
Would it be wise to initiate a more proactive response when you are severely undermanned, even in the first stages of the riot, as you would have liked to have seen?
|
It would not only be wise, it would be
imperative.
Since the police did not have enough personnel to handle a riotous crowd, it became essential to act
before the crowd became riotous. I have spoken to witnesses who say it would have required no more than about ten or twenty officers to safely detain the handful of people who initially began to vandalize the car and thereby stop the riot from beginning in the first place. But the police hesitated. Emboldened by police inaction, more people then joined in on the destruction. When the police hesitated even further, the crowd set fire to the car. Once that happened, we had the beginning of the riot.
It is precisely in situations where you do not have enough assets to deal with things if they get out of control that a truly proactive approach becomes more important than ever.
A thousand firefighters could not stop a wildfire once it gets going, but the match that ignites it can be doused by one person with ease. On Wednesday, the crowd was the forest and the car vandals were the match.