HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1421  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2023, 11:54 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Meanwhile, MTO officers have been conducting speed traps on the 407 between Hamilton and Peel Region.
It’s been a year since the trend began, but I wonder what got them targeting passenger vehicles too. They’re usually only after commercial vehicles.
Like here: https://twitter.com/handell_cve/stat...YrgET1MNQTjqUQ

Ps: They stopped people for doing 130+ kph too whereas O.P.P. wouldn’t even have batted an eye for anything < 140 kph on the 407.
The thing with the 407 is that most times it is freeflowing. That is a good reason that people will go faster. The fact most of it has been built like an autobahn is also part of the problem.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1422  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 12:21 AM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,761
Why can't the owners of the ETR arbitrarily set a higher speed limit? Setting it to 120 would be a hell of a sales pitch. They could also run their own enforcement to line their own pockets. Maybe even based on the times they enter and exit. If you get on in Milton and exit in Markham in a time that you should still be at Yonge St, tack on a speed fine to the toll. It is private after all
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1423  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 12:39 AM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,669
The speed limit of the 407 ETR is set by Ontario law, the operators of the ETR can't arbitrarily change it.

Specifically Regulation 619 made under the Highway traffic act deals with speed limits for provincial highways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1424  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 2:02 AM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonysnob View Post
The speed limit of the 407 ETR is set by Ontario law, the operators of the ETR can't arbitrarily change it.

Specifically Regulation 619 made under the Highway traffic act deals with speed limits for provincial highways.
It's not a provincial highway though, it's a private highway. If I own a big chunk of land, can the province tell me I can't drive as fast as I want on it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1425  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 2:24 AM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,669
yeah, so I'm not sure how to say this, but the laws of Ontario still apply to private lands.

The Highway 407 Act does indicate that the 407 is a private toll highway and is not a part of the King's Highway, but then the same Act subsequently indicates that for the purpose of the application of the Highway Traffic Act, that Highway 407 shall be considered part of the King's Highway.

Schedule 264 of Regulation 619 made under the Highway Traffic Act then includes the following text:

SCHEDULE 264
HIGHWAY 407

Part 1
Regional Municipality of Halton — City of Burlington
Regional Municipality of Durham — City of Pickering
1. That part of the private toll highway known as Highway 407 lying between a point situate at its intersection with the King’s Highway known as No. 403 and the Queen Elizabeth Way in the City of Burlington in The Regional Municipality of Halton and a point situate at the centre line of the underpass structure of the roadway known as Brock Road in the City of Pickering in The Regional Municipality of Durham.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1426  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 2:40 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
It's not a provincial highway though, it's a private highway. If I own a big chunk of land, can the province tell me I can't drive as fast as I want on it?
Short answer - provincial law applies to private lands.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1427  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 2:44 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
Anyway, now we know why 407ETR owners can’t increase the speed limit to 110 kph on a whim.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1428  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 2:56 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Meanwhile, MTO officers have been conducting speed traps on the 407 between Hamilton and Peel Region.
It’s been a year since the trend began, but I wonder what got them targeting passenger vehicles too. They’re usually only after commercial vehicles.
Like here: https://twitter.com/handell_cve/stat...YrgET1MNQTjqUQ

Ps: They stopped people for doing 130+ kph too whereas O.P.P. wouldn’t even have batted an eye for anything < 140 kph on the 407.
I’ve noticed people driving significantly slower on that stretch of the 407 lately and wondered why. Everyone’s doing 120 like a normal 400 series highway but once you get out to York Region and 140 seems like the minimum speed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1429  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 5:05 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,730
It's a good stretch to monitor. Some of those curves, while relatively gentle, offer hiding places for enforcement that drivers don't see until it's too late. Similar for that dip under the rail bridge near the inspection stations between Appleby and Bronte. Plus the traffic is usually fairly light on this portion of the highway. It's very tempting to go over 120... and easy to find oneself cruising around 140.

I rarely use it, but the last few times there has been an OPP cruiser on the road doing close to the limit and many dare not pass it. I imagine the odd fool blows by them without realizing, and gets lighter in the bank account for it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1430  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 12:47 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,669
Nothing like having to pay a toll, when you are already paying a toll.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1431  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 1:53 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
In other words, watch out for big American cars (i.e. Ford, Chevy) with a bull bar.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1432  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 2:22 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonysnob View Post
Nothing like having to pay a toll, when you are already paying a toll.
It's for this reason that my understanding was why cops tended not to do too much speed enforcement on the 407 beyond the craziest outliers.

I know someone who has driven on the 407 daily for work since the day it opened, and being no speed slouch, has never once been pulled over for speeding. They've been pulled over 3-4 times for issues with his license plate though (snow covering it, trailer plate which fell off due to rust, etc.). Which shows you what cops are usually looking for (people dodging tolls). That said, they use the eastern part of the highway and basically never drives on the Halton Region part.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1433  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2023, 2:46 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
There are only 2 portions of 407 that have only 6 lanes: Halton, and Durham. My impression is that the former tends to be busier than the latter (though I may be out to lunch on this one.)
If that’s the case, i wonder whether that’s why MTO officers patrol it more and have lower tolerance for 130+ km/h.
It also helps that the Halton stretch has a truck inspection station as that gives them a reason to roam around.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1434  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2023, 10:21 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,669
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1435  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2023, 2:22 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
With the announcement of the Ontario budget being bigger with more spending on infrastructure, could we expect announcements for twinning of any highways not already in progress?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1436  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2023, 2:49 AM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,761
Probably not, the biggest chunk of the increase is probably previously announced stuff like Bradford Bypass and the 413.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1437  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2023, 3:13 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
Probably not, the biggest chunk of the increase is probably previously announced stuff like Bradford Bypass and the 413.
So, he is pushing the Bradford Bypass through?

No love for 17/69....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1438  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2023, 9:49 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
With the announcement of the Ontario budget being bigger with more spending on infrastructure, could we expect announcements for twinning of any highways not already in progress?
In some sense, you can count 17 between Arnprior and Renfrew?
So far, other than the interchange at Calabogie Road, absolutely nothing else is happening (other than redoing culvert and repaving).

I want to see 17/69 redone as well, but right now, it’s just too much commitment. It pretty much requires redoing 69 between 17 and Estaire Road as well, and this is the textbook definition of scope creep. (Remember, there’s a realignment that requires cutting 25 m ~ 30 m of igneous rocks in depth.)
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1439  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2023, 12:02 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,731
there will probably be a few new projects which trickle out in the next month or so, and we'll know more when they update the highways program website.

I would be seriously surprised if it was more twinning in Northern Ontario beyond more detailed timelines for already announced widenings though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1440  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2023, 1:12 PM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post

No love for 17/69....
I mean, Ontario ends at the next side road north of his cottage, doesn't it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.