HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2021, 1:33 AM
enragedcamel enragedcamel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post


Miami isnt ever actually going to be underwater.
ok
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2021, 4:47 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 9,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post


Miami isnt ever actually going to be underwater.
That's because the water will just drain off the edges of the earth.
__________________
Hi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 2, 2022, 12:59 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by JACKinBeantown View Post
That's because the water will just drain off the edges of the earth.
No, seriously, and I say this as a Democrat:

Get out of the ‘woke’ echo chamber. Not even in the worst case scenarios is Miami really all that affected by sea level rise:

https://mdc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/web...f3e628a195a398

Set it to two feet, notice how few buildings are actually affected?

The real problems from global climate change for Miami are elsewhere, like water table rise and possible increased proclivity toward hurricanes and other extreme weather events. They aren’t going to be swallowed by a rising sea…
__________________
Houston: 2.4m (+3.9%) + MSA suburbs: 5.4m (+12%) + CSA exurbs: 200k (+5%)
Dallas: 1.3m (+2%) / FtW: 1.0m (+10%) + suburbs: 6.4m (9%) + exurbs: 566k (+9%)
San Antonio: 1.5m (+6%) + MSA suburbs: 1.2m (+10%) + CSA exurbs: 82k (+3%)
Austin: 994k (+3%) + MSA suburbs: 1.6m (+18%)
Texas (whole): 31.29m (+7%) / Texas (balance): 8.6m (+3%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 2, 2022, 1:43 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 9,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
No, seriously, and I say this as a Democrat:

Get out of the ‘woke’ echo chamber. Not even in the worst case scenarios is Miami really all that affected by sea level rise:

https://mdc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/web...f3e628a195a398

Set it to two feet, notice how few buildings are actually affected?

The real problems from global climate change for Miami are elsewhere, like water table rise and possible increased proclivity toward hurricanes and other extreme weather events. They aren’t going to be swallowed by a rising sea…
OK... now add giant waves and swells from those more intense hurricanes and extreme weather events, and watch the resultant inland flooding. The sea doesn't have to rise 10 feet for the city to be under water, even if only some of the time. It's already happened in sections of New York and it will only get worse. Anyway, this thread is about a nonexistent building in Austin.
__________________
Hi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2021, 8:47 PM
Altoic's Avatar
Altoic Altoic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,513
Good for both cities, Austin and Miami deserve it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2021, 8:30 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by Altoic View Post
Good for both cities, Austin and Miami deserve it.
1,022 feet for a city the size of Austin is amazing!!! Not many other cities on the planet could lay claim to a 1,000+ footer with roughly 2.5 million in its metro area.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 993,588 +3.30% - '20-'24 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,550,637 +11.70% - '20-'24
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,526,656 +6.41% - '20-'24 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,763,006 +8.01% - '20-'24
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,313,643 +9.75% - '20-'24 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2022, 7:08 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,205
Yeah, it's not the constant water levels I worry about which even if they are higher will be tame and manageable, it's when that water turns into a fast moving torrent during tropical systems. Just go look for "Miami flooding" on Youtube, especially the videos related to Hurricane Irma.

I'm also less concerned with sea level rise as it'll be more or less unnoticeable, but what I do worry about is more intense storms and ones that are more frequent so that life and business stay disrupted often and long enough to make it not worth it (read economically feasible) for some people to stay. Not everyone down there has another house somewhere. Some of those are the primary residence of people who grew up there.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2022, 7:22 AM
Altoic's Avatar
Altoic Altoic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,513
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2022, 3:24 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 9,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Altoic View Post
Sad that it's necessary, especially when we could collectively have done something about it. But this looks like a good plan.

(How did this become a Miami thread? I guess I'm partly to blame. Whatever... when someone has something to say about this building we'll go back to Austin.)
__________________
Hi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2022, 7:59 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by JACKinBeantown View Post
Sad that it's necessary, especially when we could collectively have done something about it. But this looks like a good plan.

(How did this become a Miami thread? I guess I'm partly to blame. Whatever... when someone has something to say about this building we'll go back to Austin.)
I went to visit the lockes in the Netherlands a few years ago and they said that basically every major US metro on a coast has come to visit them in the last 5 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2022, 10:35 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,729
I drove by the 98RR site this afternoon, and it sure looks like it's about to get underway with the right of way closure.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2022, 10:50 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,729
Here's the excavation permit for the utility work about to get underway on Red River. The permit confirms that it is for the "98 Red River Waller Creek" project, and it also states that it is for this project's site plan.

https://abc.austintexas.gov/public-s...rtyrsn=2019189
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2022, 4:13 PM
Geckos_Rule's Avatar
Geckos_Rule Geckos_Rule is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Austin
Posts: 846
In 92RR-related news, a lane of Red River has been blocked off now...

It only raises the question for me of: with a lane of Red River being blocked for presumably 3-4 years at minimum, there functionally isn't a sidewalk going from Cesar Chavez to Rainey St until you get to the Quincy.... The renderings for this one give me hope, but they really better follow through on some sidewalks and walkability for their section of this land. Particularly considering that the same developer owns the parking lot across the street (which has just recently been paved, for some reason), and that won't be gaining legitimate sidewalks any time soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2022, 6:32 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geckos_Rule View Post
...which has just recently been paved, for some reason)...
Maybe they paved it for construction worker parking - so that the cars going in-and-out don't create too much additional dust (and mud during rains)?!?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2022, 10:49 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 9,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geckos_Rule View Post
In 92RR-related news, a lane of Red River has been blocked off now...

It only raises the question for me of: with a lane of Red River being blocked for presumably 3-4 years at minimum, there functionally isn't a sidewalk going from Cesar Chavez to Rainey St until you get to the Quincy.... The renderings for this one give me hope, but they really better follow through on some sidewalks and walkability for their section of this land. Particularly considering that the same developer owns the parking lot across the street (which has just recently been paved, for some reason), and that won't be gaining legitimate sidewalks any time soon.
Sidewalk sheds. In New York it's just to be expected. But maybe it's a zoning regulation that Austin doesn't have. (Maybe someone here should look into that.)


https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/R91E...44937696.0.jpg
__________________
Hi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2022, 4:11 PM
Geckos_Rule's Avatar
Geckos_Rule Geckos_Rule is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Austin
Posts: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by JACKinBeantown View Post
Sidewalk sheds. In New York it's just to be expected. But maybe it's a zoning regulation that Austin doesn't have. (Maybe someone here should look into that.)
I think more likely, closing a lane of a street like we see here just isn't possible in NYC, so they work around it. A sidewalk shed is probably possible in Austin, but a developer isn't going to fool with it when they can just take the full lane.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2022, 5:17 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geckos_Rule View Post
I think more likely, closing a lane of a street like we see here just isn't possible in NYC, so they work around it. A sidewalk shed is probably possible in Austin, but a developer isn't going to fool with it when they can just take the full lane.
Haven't we seen sidewalk sheds in Austin? I don't make it downtown as much these days, but I could have sworn that my wife and I walked through one a few months back.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2022, 6:10 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,320
Not to self: avoid CC for the next 2 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2022, 7:11 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geckos_Rule View Post
I think more likely, closing a lane of a street like we see here just isn't possible in NYC, so they work around it. A sidewalk shed is probably possible in Austin, but a developer isn't going to fool with it when they can just take the full lane.
I don't think he understood the lane was taken along with the sidewalk by a barrier. Not quite sure why they did this, its hard enough to get out of Rainey St over to Mopac as it is.

And yes, there are side walk sheds around downtown from time to time. Some work apparently requires them. When they did maintenance at the 4SR they installed them. Seen them around elsewhere too. But in this situation, there is no sidewalk, to install one. But what all is really needed, is a sidewalk. (And that extra lane of road we had stolen) They pulled this over the holidays when its dead on Rainey St, wait until we get back into the full swing of Rainey St fun, its gonna be tough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2022, 4:40 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,729
A photo from the Twitterverse. RR is being dug up now inside of the barriers, and the former Ironworks parking overflow is fenced off.


Photo by Steve R.https://twitter.com/TheATX1/status/1480692239491809283
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:40 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.