HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1401  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2022, 1:22 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 8,891
It gets pounded by gravel and dump trucks every day. Hopefully they take the time to engineer a thicker base that will last longer then a thin top coat of asphalt.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1402  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2022, 5:58 PM
CanadianTalk's Avatar
CanadianTalk CanadianTalk is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,285
Fanshawe Park Road West rehab (between Hyde Park Rd and Dalmagarry Rd) is set to begin on July 7th.

Construction will last until the end of September.

Last edited by CanadianTalk; Aug 21, 2022 at 12:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1403  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2022, 6:01 PM
CanadianTalk's Avatar
CanadianTalk CanadianTalk is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,285
Here are the PIC slides from last night regarding the Western Road and Sarnia Road / Philip Aziz Avenue EA.

These slides are a bit more detailed than the ones shared on here last week as they show the design of the roads, and the rationale for choosing certain design concepts over others (ie: normal crosswalk vs scramble)

Edit: The link expires after a certain amount of time. For the slides, go to getinvolved.london.ca/westernsarnia, then under the Documents section, click on the June 23 PIC 2 slides.

Last edited by CanadianTalk; Jun 25, 2022 at 2:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1404  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2022, 3:35 PM
CanadianTalk's Avatar
CanadianTalk CanadianTalk is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,285
The old building (that housed London Audio and Hakim Optical) at the SE corner of Fanshawe Park and Richmond is currently being demolished to make way for the major construction project at that intersection next year.

https://london.ca/projects/fanshawe-park-road-richmond-street-intersection-improvements-project
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1405  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2022, 7:50 PM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is offline
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,442
So crazy they're doing this and building a transit village in the area but not doing BRT.

Transit oriented development without transit? Yep, that's London planning 101.
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1406  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2022, 10:25 PM
Spoofy Spoofy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 126
.

Last edited by Spoofy; Oct 10, 2023 at 10:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1407  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2022, 11:54 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 8,891
The fact remains the BRT plan for Richmond was insanely bad. I and many others rejected the proposal from the so called experts to build a bus only tunnel under the CP tracks on Richmond while leaving pedestrians, vehicles using one lane north and south at grade and waiting for the CP trains. That was the proposal. What genius came up with that concept? I believe they budgeted $90M for that. They also wanted to built an underground bus stop at Richmond and Oxford intersection for another $90M. Ignore the money amounts which we all know would be far higher in reality the idea to build a bus only tunnel and underground bus stop was absurd. Nobody supported that idea. Far better would have been a elevated LRT that would go over the CP tracks and return to grade just north of Oxford and find its way up by or thru part of Western to north of Fanshawe Rd. It would need to be elevated most likely in a few other spots on the way where it makes sense. With only a handful of stops and highspeed it would truly be an improvement over BRT and cut travel time from Masonville to downtown to a fraction of the BRT time.


That would be a real improvement that would get support



Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoofy View Post
I'm just as frustrated as anyone about the outcome of the BRT proposal. Still, I feel like the planning team/community doesn't deserve the majority of the blame for it (they absolutely deserve some blame, to be clear). The planning staff recommended the entire system be built, they did their job. They even got rapid transit into the London Plan. Now, I believe there's absolutely an argument to be made that the recommendation should have been for the LRT/BRT split, but at the end of the day, they did recommend the complete rapid transit system.

It was the councillors themselves, who when it came time to vote on the system, backed down and kowtowed to their NIMBY constituents. It was these same NIMBYs that are also making the entire project take much longer than it needs to as well. I looked back at the original timeline and construction was supposed to have started in 2018/2019, a full three years ago. By now we should've had done the White oaks - downtown portion, with the wonderland - downtown portion finishing up this year, and the downtown portion starting next year. That's almost half the system, and instead we don't have any of that and only have half of the downtown system built. The only reason for this delay is because the NIMBYs kept fighting back against the proposal until it was reduced to what we have under construction today.

To me, what has happened to the BRT proposal is a picture-perfect example of everything that's wrong with our local politics. NIMBYs have far too loud a voice, and their local councillors bend over far too easily to their demands. BRT is a great example of a community (certain wards) not actually understanding how a local initiative will impact them (it would have improved their day-to-day life significantly, even those who drive every day), and as a result of that misunderstanding, they canvass against it. There is an argument to be made that the planning team/community could have done more to show them they were misunderstanding the proposal, but at the same time, there is also an argument to be made that those same constituents are hopeless in situations like these.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1408  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2022, 12:18 AM
Djeffery's Avatar
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 6,202
The tunnel originally was an LRT tunnel, from somewhere near the north side of Vic Park to St Joe's Hospital. Still say the boat was missed in not using Wharncliffe rather than Richmond, but people wanted Richmond Row involved. Would have been a lot less pushback from Wharncliffe residents compared to the more monied Richmond folks, half of the route was rebuilt and the CP Rail bridge was being replaced. Plus it would have been a middle finger to Western and their demands for "allowing" the BRT to run through campus.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1409  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2022, 12:05 AM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 8,891
Queens Ave resurfacing between Quebec and Maitland is kicking off.


https://getinvolved.london.ca/queensave
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1410  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2022, 2:54 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 8,891
After 3 weeks of closure Sunningdale Rd is reopened just west of the golf course entrance. They were hooking up utilities to service the new sub diversion going in on the south side. They rebuilt the road with new pavement and shoulders at 2 lanes wide. Hopefully they planned for and made allowances for the rebuild to 4 lanes which is scheduled for next year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1411  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2022, 12:15 AM
CanadianTalk's Avatar
CanadianTalk CanadianTalk is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianTalk View Post
Fanshawe Park Road West rehab (between Hyde Park Rd and Dalmagarry Rd) is set to begin on July 7th.

Construction will last until the end of September.
Almost a month and a half later and construction has not started on this yet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1412  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2022, 2:55 PM
CanadianTalk's Avatar
CanadianTalk CanadianTalk is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianTalk View Post
Fanshawe Park Road West rehab (between Hyde Park Rd and Dalmagarry Rd) is set to begin on July 7th.

Construction will last until the end of September.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianTalk View Post
Almost a month and a half later and construction has not started on this yet.
The city posted on their facebook page that this construction project will finally start this coming Tuesday, September 6... two months behind schedule.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1413  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2022, 3:16 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 8,891
Months late and no doubt costing more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1414  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2022, 5:29 PM
Djeffery's Avatar
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 6,202
Well into the 14th month of Dingman being closed now. A reminder that only 5 years ago, the much more complex Veterans Memorial Parkway overpass was demolished and rebuilt, with new ramps, in under 8 months.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1415  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2022, 4:14 PM
CanadianTalk's Avatar
CanadianTalk CanadianTalk is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,285
The EA has been completed for Windermere Road (from Western Road to Doon Drive's west leg) and Richmond Street (from Windermere Road to Thames River).

https://pub-london.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=94515

Page 21 of the link above shows renderings of the roads.

The EA recommends in-boulevard bike paths along both sides of Windermere, and a two-way cycle track on the east side of Richmond.

The Windermere and Richmond intersection will also be completely refigured. Changes include a re-alignment to provide better sight-lines, a new EB right turn lane, and centre medians for all 4 corners.

Construction is expected to take place likely sometime between 2024-2027.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1416  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2022, 2:13 AM
tyeman200's Avatar
tyeman200 tyeman200 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
The tunnel originally was an LRT tunnel, from somewhere near the north side of Vic Park to St Joe's Hospital. Still say the boat was missed in not using Wharncliffe rather than Richmond, but people wanted Richmond Row involved. Would have been a lot less pushback from Wharncliffe residents compared to the more monied Richmond folks, half of the route was rebuilt and the CP Rail bridge was being replaced. Plus it would have been a middle finger to Western and their demands for "allowing" the BRT to run through campus.
When it comes to Western, London should have told them to eat dirt and we are doing it anyways. What is Western gunna do, move?? Yeah no way they would leave their old campus here for somewhere else, they are stuck here. London totally has the advantage over them. At the very least, I would tell Western we are building it in front of their campus, and of they want to be a part of it in the future, they are paying for it all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1417  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2022, 11:38 PM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 8,891
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1418  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2022, 11:41 PM
Spoofy Spoofy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 126
.

Last edited by Spoofy; Oct 10, 2023 at 10:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1419  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2022, 1:02 AM
Djeffery's Avatar
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 6,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoofy View Post
I'm very interested to see if MVH gets reelected.. this kind of thinking just makes no sense at all to me. I don't understand how any sane adult can seriously argue against infrastructure that protects the most vulnerable road users, especially in London a city dominated by car culture and unsafe driving.
I can't stand the guy, and you can tell if you watch the online council meetings that he doesn't have a lot of respect amongst the councillors. Or at least the ones using Zoom and you can see their facial expressions when he talks (and talks and talks). I would love to see him defeated, but he has 8 opponents, none of whom are well known, so even if people are interested in voting against him, is any one of those 8 going to rise up to be the main opponent?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1420  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2022, 2:15 AM
CanadianTalk's Avatar
CanadianTalk CanadianTalk is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
...but he has 8 opponents, none of whom are well known, so even if people are interested in voting against him, is any one of those 8 going to rise up to be the main opponent?
Yep, I agree with everything you said, but this is the part that concerns me the most. As there are a relatively large number of people running against the incumbent, and none of them have a high profile (that I am aware of), the votes against the incumbent will most likely be split among the 8 candidates. I really hope I am wrong.

I don't live in Ward 1 anymore (I moved to ward 5 not too long after the last municipal election), but if I did, I'd be having a really hard time trying to find just one candidate to pick. If this provides a glimmer of hope, I do know people that voted for the incumbent last election, but will not vote for him this election.

-

And yeah Spoofy, I also agree that it's strange to critique the addition of safer infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists on Windermere. Better infrastructure will enable more people to bike in the area (I know I would). But the whole road will need to be torn up in a few years for the replacement of sewers, watermains, etc, so why not add the protected infrastructure while the road is being digged up anyway?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:34 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.