HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2017, 2:52 PM
gjhall's Avatar
gjhall gjhall is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,297
When was the last planned multi-day planning committee? Last I can recall was the Westboro Convent in 2010.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2017, 4:50 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by gjhall View Post
When was the last planned multi-day planning committee? Last I can recall was the Westboro Convent in 2010.
I remember that. How many children have died from shadows and wind since then, I wonder?
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2017, 12:02 AM
gjhall's Avatar
gjhall gjhall is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
I remember that. How many children have died from shadows and wind since then, I wonder?
They're all gone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2017, 12:58 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by gjhall View Post
They're all gone.
Poor buggers.

Perhaps Ottawa needs a Victims of Gentrification memorial. #NevarForget
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2017, 1:28 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,834
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2017, 1:31 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
One hopes it will be a successful "learning experience" for an important program. One hopes as well that the City will make an ex gratia payment to compensate the landlord.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2017, 6:06 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,556
Vanier shelter report a sign Ottawa is 'going backwards,' critics say
Draft report may support building 350-bed shelter on Montreal Road

By Trevor Pritchard, CBC News
Posted: Oct 29, 2017 5:00 AM ET Last Updated: Oct 29, 2017 10:11 AM ET


Vanier residents say they're disappointed by the revelation from their councillor that a draft report may suggest giving a controversial 350-bed shelter on Montreal Road the go-ahead.

"It seems that not all the voices or the comments of the residents have been taken into consideration," said Suzanne Lepine, one of a few dozen people who attended Saturday's public forum on the Salvation Army shelter project.

The Salvation Army intends to close its existing shelter on George Street in the ByWard Market and sell it to help pay for a new $50-million facility in Vanier, which would be home to counselling, job training and medical services.

Of the 350 beds, 140 would be reserved for emergency stays, according to the proposal.

Coun. Mathieu Fleury, who represents the area, told CBC News on Friday that a draft city report expected to be made public in early November is recommending the project be greenlighted.

CBC News has not seen a copy of that report.

"I'm shocked. That's all I can say," said Tim Aubry, a University of Ottawa psychology professor who's been a strong proponent of the housing first model of tackling homelessness. The program pairs individuals with landlords in the city, while also offering counselling and other supports.

"I think [that draft report] is a reflection that Ottawa's going backwards … That's one of the big problems with the Salvation Army project. It's based on, quite frankly, the delivery of outdated programs," Aubry said.

The housing first approach hasn't always worked seamlessly, as one landlord recently discovered after a tenant trashed one unit of his duplex — which was also located in Vanier.

Aubry said those instances are rare and outweighed by extensive research showing the benefits of a housing first approach.

Lepine, a lifelong Vanier resident who lives only a few blocks away from the proposed shelter, said she agreed.

"I think housing first is a model that the community of Vanier could live with," Lepine said. "People could be integrated. It's a good approach, versus the Salvation Army proposal."

Three dates have then been set aside in November for the city's planning committee to consider the shelter's rezoning application.

The Salvation Army has said it wants to relocate to Vanier because that's where its clients are. Opposition, however, has been steady, and many at Saturday's forum vowed to bring their concerns to the planning committee debate.

"I'm frustrated with the way the city is behaving. It treats the people of Vanier as an afterthought at best, and a place it can dump social problems at worst," said Vanier resident Paul Heinbecker.

"All you have to do is take one look at George Street, and the Salvation Army centre down there, and ask yourself whether you'd like that situation to be in your neighbourhood."

The NDP riding association, which hosted Saturday's forum, will be making a submission to the planning committee, urging it to endorse "a more decentralized and small-scale approach."

"I know that the community right now is facing a decision. This decision has been polarized. Not everybody agrees," said Nickel Belt MPP France Gélinas, the party's health critic, who also spoke at Saturday's forum.

Gélinas said she understood the conflict at the heart of the Montreal Road shelter debate, having dealt with a similar issue over a "wet shelter" — a facility that would hand out doctor-prescribed alcohol to residents dealing with addiction issues — in Sudbury.

She refused to weigh in on the Salvation Army's proposal, calling shelters an "integral part" of the strategy to fight homelessness, but also lauding the housing first approach.

Critiquing the project was best left to Vanier residents themselves, Gélinas added.

"I would say the whole spectrum is often part of the solution," she said. "[But] it varies with every community."

The city's official shelter report is expected to be made public on Nov. 7.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/vanier-salvation-army-shelter-report-reaction-1.4376951
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2017, 7:59 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,176
What is the process after the City's report is made public?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2017, 12:34 AM
BlueJay's Avatar
BlueJay BlueJay is offline
Bulid Up, Not Out
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 391
Thumbs down

If this actually happens, this will be a set back for any potential for redeveloping Vanier as the city had planned too. I was a part of a similar project on a smaller scale on Merivale Rd that did nothing to help the neighbourhood. It only increased problems to the already present problems that the Kirkwood/Merivale/Caldwell area had.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2017, 6:30 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueJay View Post
If this actually happens, this will be a set back for any potential for redeveloping Vanier as the city had planned too. I was a part of a similar project on a smaller scale on Merivale Rd that did nothing to help the neighbourhood. It only increased problems to the already present problems that the Kirkwood/Merivale/Caldwell area had.
The city's plan for Vanier seems to be a combination of benign neglect at best, nefarious neglect in between, and open hostility at worst.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2017, 6:08 PM
downtown_eddie_brown downtown_eddie_brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 76
Trying to Make Sense out of Planning Sense: The Proposed Salvation Army Social Services Complex in Vanier

Dan Stankovic
Posted: Oct 31, 2017


The proposed Salvation Army project is, without doubt, the most controversial active planning file at the City today. The Planning and Growth Management Department recently published a draft planning report recommending that City Council approve the Official Plan and Zoning Amendments application to allow the project to be built on Montreal Road in Vanier. The draft report has generated considerable opposition from the community as well as other interested individuals and organizations. The concerns and issues raised against the project have been extensively covered in the local media and in online social networks and I will only summarize the key ones below:
  1. The proposal contravenes the City’s Official Plan policies including its policies on Traditional Main Streets as well as the 2013 Montreal Road District Secondary Plan which places a priority on the commercial revitalization of the area. The proposal also runs counter to Ontario’s 2014 Provincial Policy Statement Under the Planning Act which states that the viability and vitality of main streets need to be enhanced where possible, as well as creating opportunities for sustainable economic development.
  2. The proposal contradicts the City’s 2008 Interim Control Bylaw which limits the number of shelters in Ward 12 to 4. The Bylaw was based on a City study addressing community issues regarding the concentration of various social services and shelters over the “rise in drug trafficking, drug abuse and illegal acts that occur near shelters” resulting in negative impacts on nearby residents and businesses.
  3. The proposal itself is incompatible with the City’s Housing First plan to support the provision of stable, permanent housing for the homeless and not on short-term beds or emergency shelters. The Salvation Army proposal is based on an outdated, ineffective approach to homelessness. The Province of Ontario recently introduced its “Home for Good” program. The City recently received funding of $30 million over 3 years under the Program.
  4. The draft report does not accurately reflect the opinions and feedback received from the public which showed overwhelming opposition to the proposal. The community also expressed concerns over how the public consultation process was managed in terms of timing and announcements. If the final report does, in fact, under-represent public concerns, then it would also go against the City’s Public Engagement policies approved in 2014.

The proposed project will be a major setback to the community of Vanier in terms of its quality of life and future revitalization. Vanier, instead, will become the centre of concentration for the homeless after the mega-shelter is built which will also more related support services which the community already has more than its fair share.

I have also pointed out in my previous blogs that the two documents prepared in support of the Salvation Army’s planning applications by two high profile, high powered (somebody else’s words – not mine) consultants fall far short of providing sound rational and an accurate assessment of the benefits and impacts of the proposal in terms of economic development, community revitalization and land use planning.

Mayor Jim Watson has also expressed his support of the proposed project at least according to various media reports. It is difficult for sure to know his reasons for supporting the project since the Mayor has not released any official press release but he has been quoted as saying.

Quote:
“I’m open to those people who oppose it to come forward with alternative sites for the Salvation Army to look at, but at the end of the day it’s a private organization that’s putting a bid on a motel and I think what they’re proposing would be miles ahead of the motel operation that’s there right now”
……a bit unusual if not unique argument for supporting a change to the City’s Official Plan and previous efforts to improve the quality of life in Vanier.

The Mayor has also stated that the concentration of support services is the best approach for supporting the homeless. This argument again is contrary to the results of the 2008 Interim Control Bylaw as well as to generally accepted view that the concentration of social housing and low-income families in single projects or neighbourhoods is undesirable.

The fundamental question arises then – what is the rationale for the planners’ recommendation to approve the amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law if indeed there is strong community opposition and strong social and economic counter-arguments. I have not seen the draft report which is not supposed to be released publically until November 7 but I would venture to say that it is not what’s in the report that is behind the recommended approval. Once again, my reasoning as to why is not really new.

The Downtown core and especially in the Byward Market / Rideau area has experienced a significant amount of new real estate investment over the last decade and more by the private sector. This includes an expanded Rideau Centre, the new/renovated Shaw Centre (conventions and exhibitions) and numerous new luxury high rise condominium towers. The Byward Market and hotels such as The Westin are also important destinations for visitors (including business and government diplomats) and tourists. Throw in also, the major new investment in the City’s LRT system in the downtown and the expansion of the University of Ottawa.

The combination of the above factors, in turn, have put pressure on the City (i.e. the Mayor) and homeless organizations to close their operations and relocate elsewhere. The Salvation Army Booth Centre on George St. may well be at the front of the line to be followed by The Ottawa Mission on Waller St. and the Shepherds of Good Hope on Murray St. in the future.

Claridge Homes has been a pioneer developer of condominium buildings in the downtown core including 700 Sussex on the former Daly Building site and the 4 Claridge Plaza towers on Rideau/Besserer with a total of almost 1,000 units. The developer recently obtained zoning amendment and site plan approvals to build a new 22-storey, 282-unit condominium tower and to convert the existing Union of Canada building into a hotel with an additional 3 storeys, at 137-141 George Street immediately adjacent to the Salvation Army Booth Centre. The site is also a short 600 metres, 7-minute walk to the Shepherds of Good Hope. The consultant who prepared the supporting planning documentation was FOTENN, the same firm hired by the Salvation Army for their Montreal Road zoning and Official Plan amendment applications.

It would not require too much thought to come up with the scenario that the Salvation Army probably has a pretty good offer on the table to sell their property.

It will be interesting to see what kind of spin the final report will have to support the recommendation to approve the zoning and official plan amendments. My guess is that the report will probably get Council’s approval in the end – Mayor Watson would have most likely tested the political waters before expressing his support for the project in the media. Even if 81% of the total estimated voters in Vanier picked him for Mayor in the last 2014 election, compared to 76% for the whole City, they only accounted for less than 2% of his total votes.

Richard Florida, one of most quoted urbanist and well known for his thinking about the rise of the “creative class”, has recently written about the New Urban Crisis whereby the urban revival of the last two decades fueled by innovation and growth in high technology industries combined with skilled talent moving back to the central city from the suburbs has led to an increasing inequality or segregation across neighbourhoods. The struggle between Vanier and the City of Ottawa / Salvation Army mirrors to some degree, Florida’s thinking. The increasing attractiveness of living downtown by the more affluent is pushing out the less desirable occupants and land uses to more disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Vanier has historically been viewed as the poor cousin of urban Ottawa.

https://urbanomicsblog.wordpress.com/201...y-social-services-complex-in-vanier/amp/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2017, 4:47 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,556
'It's not a done deal': Fleury optimistic on shelter application
Despite a leaked report which suggested staff support for the Salvation Army, Coun. Mathieu Fleury is confident that the application can be stopped.

By: Kieran Delamont, Metro
Published on Tue Oct 31 2017


Coun. Mathieu Fleury said he can muster support to reject the controversial Salvation Army application after a draft of a city staff report was leaked last week.

"I'm confident that we can get support from colleagues," said Fleury. "I'm very confident that it's not a done deal."

Fleury called the report "very irritating," adding that "there's a lot in the report that's just wrong."

The draft, which is still unfinished and has not been publicly released by the city, suggests staff will recommend approval for the project, which has drawn substantial opposition from the Vanier Community Association.

“It is extremely disappointing that the city is not considering the concerns expressed by the residents and is not requiring a social impact assessment to be done” said Lauren Touchant, who sits on the board of the Vanier Community Association. “It is unfortunate that a decision is being made without considering how it will impact a neighbourhood.”

The VCA is accusing the city of breaking its own rules in supporting the site. They argue that a “shelter accommodation” is not allowed on a traditional mainstreet. The bylaw is unclear on this: it isn’t expressly forbidden under that zoning category, but in another part of the bylaw, traditional mainstreets aren’t included in the places that shelters are allowed.

Fleury is continuing to work with the VCA to try to gather the votes to reject the application at planning committee, and city council if necessary. He wouldn't "reveal all of [his] strategies," but said that both the VCA and himself are actively meeting with councillors about the application.

He's also not ruling out taking this to Ontario Municipal Board.

"We could still win at the OMB, I'm not worried about that," he said on Tuesday. He added that "from a procedural standpoint, there's enough here to get it sent back" at the municipal level, however.

The city’s planning committee is expecting a lengthy process on this file, and have blocked off three full days in the middle of November for the meeting. A final draft of the report is scheduled to be released on November 7.

http://www.metronews.ca/news/ottawa/2017...y-optimistic-on-shelter-application.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2017, 6:04 PM
cycleguy2000 cycleguy2000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 10
Should City Council vote against an approval recommendation by the Planning Dept., and the matter ends up at the OMB, planning staff would very likely be subpoenaed by the proponent to testify as expert witnesses against the position of Council. Council would then have to hire outside planners to argue for their position to reject the staff recommendation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2017, 1:00 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,556
Councillor can't derail Salvation Army's shelter proposal by asking who'll pay for it, city lawyers say

David Reevely, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: November 2, 2017 | Last Updated: November 2, 2017 5:12 PM EDT


Whether the Salvation Army should be allowed to open a new homeless shelter on Montreal Road is strictly a land-use issue and can’t be handled by the group of councillors responsible for social services, the city hall legal department said Thursday afternoon.

The city’s top lawyer Rick O’Connor shot down multiple efforts by Rideau-Vanier Coun. Mathieu Fleury to change the way the city will deal with the charity’s controversial application to move out of its obsolete Booth Centre in the ByWard Market.

Having city council’s planning committee (which deals with the rezoning the Salvation Army is seeking) and its community-services committee (which spends the city’s social-services budget) hold a joint meeting on the plan was just one of them. Instead, the planning committee is to discuss the proposal starting Nov. 14; a leaked draft of city’s staff planners’ report on it says the Salvation Army should get what it wants over Fleury’s objections.

Committees can only have joint meetings when their duties intersect, O’Connor wrote. That’s rare and it doesn’t apply here. Whether the city is willing to help pay for the expanded complex the Salvation Army intends to build is totally separate from whether the Salvation Army has a good case for using land occupied by a decrepit motel for it.

“If council were found to have based its decision on housing policy considerations, such as those regarding funding and operations, instead of or as well as planning considerations, that decision may be found to be outside of its Planning Act jurisdiction,” O’Connor wrote. No matter what the decision was, it’d risk being overturned by the Ontario Municipal Board, he warned.

“While the distinction between planning considerations and policy considerations may seem subtle, it is an important one as all planning decisions must be founded on a solid planning rationale and not incorporate extraneous considerations,” he wrote.

Fleury hoped to use work the city did in 2006 and 2008, when councillors were worried about a proliferation of shelters and related services in the ByWard Market and Lowertown, to fight the Vanier proposal. None of that applies, O’Connor wrote. The strongest rejections of new shelters then were in preambles to motions and executive summaries of reports, none of which ever had any legal force, the lawyer wrote, and anyway city councils are only bound by decisions they’ve made since the most recent election.

Fleury can still try to convince his fellow councillors to reject the proposal. The key change the Salvation Army needs is permission to provide a 140-bed emergency shelter as part of a much bigger social-services complex; everything else it wants to do is allowed by Montreal Road’s current zoning.

[email protected]
twitter.com/davidreevely

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news...asking-wholl-pay-for-it-city-lawyers-say
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2017, 1:15 AM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by cycleguy2000 View Post
Should City Council vote against an approval recommendation by the Planning Dept., and the matter ends up at the OMB, planning staff would very likely be subpoenaed by the proponent to testify as expert witnesses against the position of Council. Council would then have to hire outside planners to argue for their position to reject the staff recommendation.
That rarely ever goes well. City Council hired planning consultants in opposition to staff recommendations have almost always lost. Few consultants here in Ottawa want to take on the files and the City have often retained out of town consultants or consultants not well versed in land development planning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2017, 7:35 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,254
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2017, 10:03 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,985
https://www.ottawacommunitynews.com/news...ht-for-vanier-business-owners-residents/

Michael Polowin representing the opposition to this application.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 6:32 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,556
Salvation Army's shelter only exploits homeless model we've bet the house on

Kelly Egan, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: November 12, 2017 | Last Updated: November 12, 2017 9:17 PM EST


The City of Ottawa will need a compelling reason to turn down the Salvation Army’s proposed $50-million shelter and social service hub on Montreal Road.

It hasn’t heard one yet, I would venture, and likely won’t this week.

The most important thing to keep in mind as councillors gather in committee on Tuesday is this is not an existential debate — why a shelter, why this “mega” shelter? — much as opponents would like.

It is a planning and land-use exercise, which very much narrows the question to something else: Do the current rules allow a social service complex to be built in that location and does it broadly fit into existing plans for Montreal Road?

The answer from staff, fairly emphatically, is yes and yes.

“The department is not responsible for determining if the need for the facility is justified,” planners state in an 83-page document. “The proposed use is evaluated from a land use perspective and it is the property owner that decides if the use will occur.”

And this dovetails with the chief weakness in arguments advanced by SOS Vanier, the ward councillor and a roster of academics: They are trying to persuade us they know better how the Salvation Army should be running its affairs.

Look. The Salvation Army has been operating in Ottawa since 1885 and operating a shelter in a converted school on George Street since 1963. It has some expertise in housing the vulnerable — indeed, its survival depends on navigating government bureaucracies and drawing from the right funding pools.

This is the wrong model, we are over and again told? Maybe. But the Sally Ann is exploiting the only model realistically in play. It is all well and good to say “housing first” is the higher road, except this model has not matured to the point where, in 2017, it’s ready to accommodate the 7,000 individuals who use shelters every year in this city.

(Why? Well, perhaps it’s a collective failure, but despite a groundbreaking national study about the success of housing first, we haven’t drawn the three levels of government together to make it the standard, rather than niche, approach to the homeless.)

Not only is the Salvation Army exploiting the current system, but it’s putting major private money forward: $50 million to turn a derelict motel and forlorn parking lot into a Barry Hobin-designed building that will improve the street’s esthetic.

And what of the feared parade of addicts, yahoos, and petty criminals, becoming a bother to a community proudly emerging from its working-class roots?

Not the committee’s problem, staff say. “While planning can regulate land use and built form, it cannot regulate the behaviour of individuals and the behaviour of individuals is not a consideration in making a planning recommendation.”

Put yourself in the shoes of a suburban councillor, indeed in the shoes of anyone but Mathieu Fleury.

On the plus side, the Sally abandons its grubby location on George Street, thus achieving the goal of diluting shelters in the ByWard Market and opening up redevelopment on the old footprint; approval permits a $50 million infusion into Montreal Road; it represents improved service delivery fairly close to the client base; and, in terms of big picture, redrawing the entire homeless housing map (funding, philosophical approach) is beyond the scope of this committee anyway.

On the negative side, good people don’t want it there, we will hear over and over this week. This is not a winning argument. You can’t base the siting of an important social service in a city the size of Ottawa by primarily asking: “Hands up who wants a shelter?”

The staff report doesn’t offer critics much to cling to. It takes some of the most common fears — decreased property values, loss of business trade, magnet for the poor, a male-only policy for residents — and dismisses them outright.

These issues “are not reviewed as part of an Official Plan or Zoning By-law amendment.” Over and out.

There is something else to keep in mind, and it has to do with motivation. We are not talking about locating a nuclear waste dump or a Walmart warehouse or building a biker headquarters.

The Salvation Army is a faith-based organization that, long-term, is committing itself to care for the most marginalized people in the city. Indeed, faith groups (Shepherds of Good Hope, Ottawa Mission) are doing the heavy lifting in this sector. If the city, province or feds think this is a terrible idea, or have a better way, then let’s have the great reveal.

But no. This is the model we’ve chosen to live with. Is there really any other sensible approach than to approve the Salvation Army plan?

To contact Kelly Egan, please call 613-726-5896 or email [email protected].
Twitter.com/kellyegancolumn

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news...its-homeless-model-weve-bet-the-house-on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 6:34 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,556
Here's how the Salvation Army can truly help transform homelessness policy

Tim Richter Tim Richter
Published on: November 13, 2017 | Last Updated: November 13, 2017 12:58 PM EST


The heated debate on the Salvation Army’s proposed Vanier project reminds me of Henry Ford’s quote, “If you always do what you’ve always done, you’ll always get what you’ve always got.”

The Salvation Army has been a leader in social services since it first arrived in Canada in 1882. Today, it plays a leading role in nearly every homeless system in Canada, including Ottawa.

As an early adopter of “Housing First,” homelessness data systems, prioritization and coordinated access, the city of Ottawa has been breaking new ground in the drive to end homelessness in Canada. The Salvation Army has also been a key partner with the city in the delivery of Housing First.

Both the city and the Salvation Army have shown a willingness to collaborate and drive innovation, which is one reason the project the Salvation Army proposes in Vanier seems so out of place. By keeping a focus on shelter and transitional housing, the Vanier project is more of what we’ve always done.

The controversy over the Vanier project presents an opportunity for the city of Ottawa and the Salvation Army to do something truly transformational.

Let’s look at the numbers. Today, there are 943 emergency shelter beds in Ottawa. According to data released by the Ottawa Alliance to End Homelessness, 7,170 different people used an emergency shelter in Ottawa in 2016. Of them, 618 people were experiencing chronic or episodic homelessness.

This means that, for most people experiencing homelessness in Ottawa, the experience is short-term; they are likely in and out of homelessness within days and never come back. A minority are homeless long-term or repeatedly. This minority, about nine per cent of the annual total, uses a disproportionately large share of the shelter beds – potentially as many as 50 per cent.

While there will always be a need for some emergency shelter for short-term use, if we want to reduce homelessness we need to get people into permanent housing and keep them there. A significant part of Ottawa’s shelter demand comes from people who are effectively using shelter as housing, which begs the question: Should we replace a shelter with a shelter, or replace a shelter with housing?

What if we took the Salvation Army’s proposed $50-million investment in shelter and transitional housing and instead put that into permanent supportive housing for chronically homeless people? What if we combined that new housing with the city’s Housing First investments and affordable housing construction; shifted shelter operating dollars to shelter diversion and rapid rehousing programs; and used city homeless system data to target these interventions?

Ottawa would soon find it’s homeless system transformed and be achieving dramatic reductions in homelessness.

Admittedly, this is easier said than done, but Ottawa can look to Finland for inspiration. Faced with similar shelter statistics, the Finns shifted focus to a Housing First approach and began by converting a 236-bed Salvation Army shelter in Helsinki to an 86-unit permanent supportive housing complex. In the last three years, Finland has reduced homelessness 10 per cent nationwide, when every other European country has seen increases. In Finland, the Salvation Army is a leader in the housing system, but it has shifted toward permanent housing and away from shelter and transitional housing.

There are lessons closer to home too. Facing a rise in family homelessness like Ottawa, the Region of Waterloo developed a family shelter diversion program in 2014 that reduced family shelter use by 64 per cent. Using a Housing First approach, Hamilton has reduced chronic homelessness 35 per cent in just two years and Edmonton has reduced overall homelessness 43 per cent since 2008.

There’s no better time than now for the city of Ottawa and the Salvation Army to forge a new path. The federal government is about to release a National Housing Strategy, while Ontario has made a commitment to end chronic homelessness, and both governments are making long-term investments in housing and Housing First initiatives. Leadership and innovation will find strong support from senior governments.

I would look at the heated debate on the Vanier project as a blessing in disguise: It’s a chance to take a step back and dream up a bigger, bolder plan to transform Ottawa’s homeless system with the Salvation Army taking a leading role.

The Salvation Army’s mission includes a desire to be a “transforming influence in the communities of our world.” Revisiting the Vanier project would be a good start.

Tim Richter is President and CEO of the Canadian Alliance to End Homelessness. Twitter: @timrichter @caehomelessness

http://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/columni...can-truly-help-transform-homeless-policy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 6:39 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,556
Salvation Army's relocation plan tests the city on the future of Vanier

Jon Willing, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: November 13, 2017 | Last Updated: November 13, 2017 1:01 PM EST


The future of Vanier hinges on a city council vote on an application by the Salvation Army to relocate its emergency shelter and health services from the ByWard Market to Montreal Road.

That’s how opponents of the proposal are characterizing the upcoming decision at Ottawa City Hall.

On the other hand, the Salvation Army believes a purpose-built complex at 333 Montreal Rd. is the only answer to moving its Booth Centre out of the Market and providing a better service to low-income families.

This is a prediction by Marc Provost, the executive director of the Salvation Army Booth Centre, of how Vanier residents will eventually view the complex: “Once they see the reality of it, once they see the families are going there and coming out with bags of toys and things are OK and that people are getting help and that people are getting housed, once they see the reality of it, they’ll be, ‘This is good. This is good.’”

Here’s what S.O.S. Vanier founder Drew Dobson predicts: “I think that residents that are more affluent will leave Vanier. I think they’ll be replaced by less-affluent residents and you’ll get a poorer community and I believe if you take a picture of any shelter in Ottawa right now, of the outside of the shelter, that will be what Montreal Road looks like outside of their facility.”

The “mega shelter” will bring more pawnshops and payday loan joints, and certainly no Starbucks shops, Dobson said.

According to the Salvation Army, the “community hub” will bring more economic activity to the commercial strip.

The first test of the Salvation Army’s development application will be at council’s planning committee this week. The committee is meeting on Tuesday in council chambers and will continue the debate on Wednesday and Friday if necessary.

The Salvation Army’s blueprint for 333 Montreal Rd.

The Salvation Army identified 333 Montreal Rd. as its preferred site because it’s on a bus route, within walking distance to other social services, and centrally located for its clients. The complex would replace the Concorde Motel.

The 9,600-square-metre, H-shaped building would have 140 emergency shelter beds, 100 beds for men in various support programs, 50 beds for men in an addiction and rehabilitation program and 60 beds for men requiring specialized health care. The blueprint has a central dining facility and spaces for several day programs, including counselling, life skills training, housing supports and family services. There would also be an outdoor amenity space.

The building would be six storeys at its tallest point.

The existing Thrift Store on Montreal Road at Ste. Anne Street is the busiest Salvation Army Thrift Store in Ottawa. The organization plans to upgrade it during the redevelopment. A coffee shop where Salvation Army clients could work would also act as a discrete entrance to family services.

The development must be approved by city council because a shelter and residential care facility isn’t a permitted use on that part of Montreal Road. Allowing it would require amendments to the official plan, secondary plan and zoning bylaw.

The current Salvation Army Booth Centre

The Salvation Army has been at 171 George St. since 1963. The emergency shelter, although it’s just one of the programs, has always been part of the organization’s core services.

The Salvation Army says the building has undergone countless renovations over the past 54 years. The organization considered staying there but concluded the footprint of the building is too small for any expanded services. On top of that, there’s nowhere for clients to be outside, other than the sidewalk.

“It’s not good for them. I’m sure they often feel like animals in a zoo where people drive by and stare at them. It’s not good for the neighbours, either. It’s not good for anybody,” Provost said.

Provost said the Salvation Army’s clients are from all walks of life.

A “fair number” of people have addictions issues and many have been through some kind of abuse in their lives, Provost said.

The residential programs focus on men, but there are elderly women, single parents, families and young parents who use day programs. There are people who are on tight budgets, people who have seen splits in their families and people who are going through divorces. Many have mental health problems.

“We deal with real life,” Provost said. “That’s the people who live in Ottawa.”

The George Street building would be sold once the Montreal Road facility opens.

The Salvation Army’s case for Vanier

The Concorde Motel on Montreal Road is the only property that the Salvation Army believes is suitable for its growing operations.

The design is flexible enough to repurpose entire wings, if needed, according to the organization.

That’s to say, the building can move away from principally being a shelter.

The emergency shelter component is the big sticking point for opponents who argue that the shelter model is out of date and doesn’t conform to a widely accepted “housing first” approach.

(The Concorde Motel supplies rooms as overflow emergency shelters, one of 14 motels and hotels under contract with the city to provide shelter services. The city has paid the Concorde Motel more than $2 million for shelter services since 2012).

Provost said the Salvation Army has had a “housing first team” since 2008, even before the 2014 endorsement by the city of the housing first strategy.

“Everything we do is focused on people being housed, being stably housed and remaining housed. Every program is geared toward that,” Provost said.

Over the past year the housing first team has housed about 100 people, Provost said.

“We’re looking forward to a future where we’ll have less and less residential emergency shelter beds and more and more of the support aspect,” he said.

Provost said the Salvation Army expected opposition to its proposal, but he believes there are more people who support it.

“They’re just being a lot quieter about it for a number of reasons,” Provost said. “We as a society tend to pay a lot of attention to the loud ones, but they’re not necessarily that large of a group and they’re not necessarily reflective of the majority.”

Provost remembered there was a similar reaction to the Salvation Army opening a transitional home on Gladstone Avenue next to a school. Now neighbours are participating in community events with the clients, Provost said.

“I think this is what will happen here, too,” Provost said of Montreal Road.

“People agree it’s necessary. It’s probably a misunderstanding as to what it really is. It’s a bit judgmental, to some degree. They don’t want to be mean. They don’t intend to be mean. It’s human nature I think, to some extent. People are generous, too.”

The Salvation Army has been pressed to defend why it needs to have a shelter and health services complex together on the same site.

If agencies refer people to different services across the city, they simply won’t go, Provost said, emphasizing the importance of “warm transfers” between programs, rather than sending clients somewhere else. The proposed site at 333 Montreal Rd. is within a 30-minute walk from other services that the Salvation Army might not offer, Provost said.

The shelter will have better conditions for men who immediately need a place to stay.

At the George Street facility, there are 12 men in a room with bunk beds. In the new site, the maximum in a room will be six men with no bunk beds. There will be more privacy, and that, Provost said, gives the men more dignity and confidence. Environment matters, he said.

The Salvation Army admits it did a bad job of sharing its intentions with the community earlier in the planning process.

“We could have done things better, we could have done things differently,” said Glenn van Gulik, the Salvation Army’s area public relations director.

“This is landscape we’re not familiar with. We’re not developers. We don’t put up buildings every day or every week or every month or every year.”

Since filing the development plan, the Salvation Army has been trying to meet with residents and businesses. It held a daylong public consultation.

Ottawa police have been clear that the Salvation Army needs to be responsible for the area around the facility and not just its property, van Gulik said.

That has convinced the Salvation Army to consider launching an ambassador program to, if necessary, watch for neighbourhood issues and clean local parks.

The Salvation Army argues that its Vanier health complex would mean more spending in the community, with staff buying items at stores and going out for meals.

“I’m sure they’ll want to eat at Finnegan’s Pub on occasion,” van Gulik said.

S.O.S. Vanier emerges as chief opponent

There are several groups in the central-east area that oppose the Salvation Army’s plan for Vanier, including the Vanier Community Association, Overbrook Community Association and the Quartier Vanier BIA, but an upstart collective of residents has been the most vocal.

S.O.S. Vanier — a nod to the S.O.S. Montfort movement that saved the Montfort Hospital in the 1990s — has established itself as the most vocal naysayer. S.O.S. Vanier’s founder is Drew Dobson, owner of Finnegan’s Pub, which is a stone’s throw from the proposed site for the Salvation Army complex. He said he would be happier to keep the Concorde Motel on the commercial strip than have the Salvation Army build its shelter there.

Ideally, Dobson would like to see a mixed-use development with some offices or stores, perhaps some condos, and possibly some of the non-shelter services the Salvation Army offers.

“We’re not proposing this be built in anyone’s backyard,” Dobson said. “We think the model is inconsistent with modern practices and we don’t think it should be built anywhere. It’s an institution.”

For several years there have been efforts by the city and community to transform Vanier, focusing on ridding the area of prostitution and drugs.

There are plans to improve the streetscape, too. Montreal Road is slated for a complete overhaul.

As part of the city’s draft 2018 budget, and perhaps not coincidentally considering the shelter controversy, Montreal Road is eyed as the next candidate for a community improvement program, which offers grants to developers as a way to generate economic activity.

“It’s a disadvantaged community,” Dobson said. “We believe bringing a shelter this size into a disadvantaged community will set it back further.”

Where the Salvation Army’s economic impact study suggests the health complex will be a boon to commerce in Vanier, opponents laughed it off as presenting only part of the picture. Dobson called the study “garbage,” criticizing the analysis for considering other developments that aren’t even in Vanier and making bad guesses at how many more jobs would be created.

Opponents of the Salvation Army’s proposal also criticize the need for an emergency shelter.

Randal Bartlett, a Vanier resident and economist, looked at the Salvation Army’s proposal from a housing and fiscal point of view. He helped organize a housing symposium promoting the importance of the housing first model. Bartlett said symposium organizers couldn’t find anyone to speak in support of the Salvation Army’s model.

Using property tax money to fund shelter beds is a pointless way of trying to solve the homelessness issue, Bartlett said.

Bartlett said the Salvation Army is only picking up its George Street operation and plopping it in Vanier.

“It’s equivalent to putting lipstick on a pig. That’s really all that’s changing here,” Bartlett said.

The politics

Politically, Rideau-Vanier Coun. Mathieu Fleury is in the least enviable position.

He represents both the ByWard Market and the area of Vanier where the Salvation Army wants to relocate. Fleury doesn’t like what the Salvation Army is proposing, and although he lauds the organization for wanting to spend $50 million in Ottawa, he’s against the idea of allowing a change in land-use rules to locate a large shelter on Vanier’s main street.

Underpinning his position are the years of work by the city to revitalize Vanier.

The greatest obstacle for opponents has been Mayor Jim Watson’s early support for the Salvation Army’s plan, just after city hall received the development application last June.

A mayoral stamp of approval almost certainly influences the positions of councillors who don’t necessarily have anything at stake in the decision.

Watson and Fleury have been interested in improving the Salvation Army’s operations in the ByWard Market, but now the politicians are at odds over the organization’s plan to move out of the tourist area.

Ottawa-Vanier MP Mona Fortier wrote to councillors on Friday asking them to reject the Salvation Army’s development application.

A land-use planning problem vs. the future of social services

The debate is framed as a land-use planning exercise.

Potentially lost at planning committee this week is the big-picture discussion about how governments fund external agencies and programs to reduce homelessness.

The city has ruled out a joint meeting of the planning committee and the community and protective services committee to assess the Salvation Army’s application.

Even if council approves the planning amendments, there’s a good chance the Salvation Army will end up at the Ontario Municipal Board in an appeal. S.O.S. Vanier is raising money for an OMB fight.

A larger debate will probably happen over the funding of shelters, but likely not until after the next municipal election in October 2018.

According to van Gulik, there’s suspected soil contamination at 333 Montreal Rd. that will require cleanup, costing about $750,000. The city has a rebate program to help developers with “brownfield” remediation costs, but van Gulik said it’s too early to say if the Salvation Army would apply.

However, the organization could one day ask the city for more grant money to operate a new, larger facility.

“It’s not impossible,” Provost said.

[email protected]
twitter.com/JonathanWilling

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news...n-tests-the-city-on-the-future-of-vanier
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:38 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.