Quote:
Originally Posted by danishh
Not really, I think she wants affordable commitments, I argued we just need units fast. Normal centretown politics.
|
So nothing against the height or design. Just the need for affordable units. That sounds fair. I doubt they will put any affordable housing in that building, but if the City could negotiate a contribution for affordable housing in exchange for the extra height, then I'm all for it. Similar to 900 Albert.
I do think the City should have in place a policy where any new development needs to have 5%-10% affordable housing (25% McKenney's pushing might not be realistic) for any new build, that is ANY, including suburban sprawl. Though I'm unsure they have that authority, but we could demand it from the province; it would be a relatively cheap policy to implement, fast-track the construction of affordable housing and reduce the burden on governments.
I don't believe purpose-built affordable housing is good policy. It increases crime rates in areas with high number of social housing and causes further social inequality issues. It's time for a modern approach.
Diane Holmes would have opposed it purely on the fact that it is over 12 floors. 12 floors: the 2000s' 27!