HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


One Water Street in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Philadelphia Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Philadelphia Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2015, 7:15 PM
blart's Avatar
blart blart is offline
Fishtown & Country
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Philly
Posts: 559
Friday, 10-9





     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2015, 7:47 PM
McBane McBane is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,707
Driving down 95 or 676, this building makes a huge impact and demonstrates to passerby our city's vibrancy and growth. Looks good so far and I think the impact on the street level will be even better.

As I've said before on this thread, at this point Delaware Ave needs three things, all of which are present in this project:

1) Density and critical mass to attract more people, to attract more retail, to attract more foot traffic

2) Buildings that are built to the sidewalk, unlike Waterfront Square, Sugarhouse, or the shopping centers.

3) Active retail on the ground floor

If we're lucky to get another 10 projects like this on Delaware Ave, then we can start getting choosey and criticizing the exterior materials, height, etc.
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2015, 8:44 PM
Mikieman Mikieman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 136
20151009_154756 by , on Flickr
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 3:12 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,457
10/14/2015



     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2015, 2:04 PM
Jawnadelphia's Avatar
Jawnadelphia Jawnadelphia is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Wilmington, Delaware
Posts: 2,906
[IMG]Untitled

[IMG]Untitled
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2015, 4:17 PM
cafeguy cafeguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by McBane View Post
Driving down 95 or 676, this building makes a huge impact and demonstrates to passerby our city's vibrancy and growth. Looks good so far and I think the impact on the street level will be even better.

As I've said before on this thread, at this point Delaware Ave needs three things, all of which are present in this project:

1) Density and critical mass to attract more people, to attract more retail, to attract more foot traffic

2) Buildings that are built to the sidewalk, unlike Waterfront Square, Sugarhouse, or the shopping centers.

3) Active retail on the ground floor

If we're lucky to get another 10 projects like this on Delaware Ave, then we can start getting choosey and criticizing the exterior materials, height, etc.
Totally right. When I drive down 95 now, I feel like 95 goes "through" the city as opposed to the edge of the city. Its really neat!
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2015, 12:52 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by cafeguy View Post
Totally right. When I drive down 95 now, I feel like 95 goes "through" the city as opposed to the edge of the city. Its really neat!
Yeah this makes a huge impact in spite of its modest height because of location. You can really see it well from the El going to or from spring garden station. When you take 676 to 95 south you really get to see how much development is happening around the base of the BFB. It's crazy, there are construction sites everywhere. When the Bridge is visible from the highway it will be even better.
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2015, 1:35 PM
Williard Mouse's Avatar
Williard Mouse Williard Mouse is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by cafeguy View Post
Totally right. When I drive down 95 now, I feel like 95 goes "through" the city as opposed to the edge of the city. Its really neat!

Last edited by Williard Mouse; Oct 19, 2015 at 1:37 PM. Reason: wrong quote.
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2015, 1:52 PM
Williard Mouse's Avatar
Williard Mouse Williard Mouse is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by McBane View Post
Driving down 95 or 676, this building makes a huge impact and demonstrates to passerby our city's vibrancy and growth. Looks good so far and I think the impact on the street level will be even better.

As I've said before on this thread, at this point Delaware Ave needs three things, all of which are present in this project:

1) Density and critical mass to attract more people, to attract more retail, to attract more foot traffic

2) Buildings that are built to the sidewalk, unlike Waterfront Square, Sugarhouse, or the shopping centers.

3) Active retail on the ground floor

If we're lucky to get another 10 projects like this on Delaware Ave, then we can start getting choosey and criticizing the exterior materials, height, etc.
The 11 story Samschick proposal for 1100-1200 N. Delaware Ave. fits the bill perfectly. It's mix of residential and ground floor retail would add more density and foot traffic to the expressway feel of the street. The "historic designation" of the nondescript warehouse can effectively kill this project.

I have sneaking suspicion that the historic tag was more the work of powerful forces like the SugarHouse and Live Nation's Fillmore than proximic NIMBYs. After all, more residential neighbors equals more noise and traffic complaints.
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2015, 2:13 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Williard Mouse View Post
The 11 story Samschick proposal for 1100-1200 N. Delaware Ave. fits the bill perfectly. It's mix of residential and ground floor retail would add more density and foot traffic to the expressway feel of the street. The "historic designation" of the nondescript warehouse can effectively kill this project.

I have sneaking suspicion that the historic tag was more the work of powerful forces like the SugarHouse and Live Nation's Fillmore than proximic NIMBYs. After all, more residential neighbors equals more noise and traffic complaints.
The developer of the Fillmore is also Samschick, i.e., the developer of 1100 N. Delaware. Therefore I doubt it.
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2015, 2:19 PM
Williard Mouse's Avatar
Williard Mouse Williard Mouse is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
The developer of the Fillmore is also Samschick, i.e., the developer of 1100 N. Delaware. Therefore I doubt it.
In that case, they can switch the proposal to a Johnny Brendas type hipster music venue, a vegan commissary, or an artist's co-op lofts and the "historic designation" will no longer present an obstacle.

Last edited by Williard Mouse; Oct 19, 2015 at 2:24 PM. Reason: omitted item
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 5:45 PM
MikeNigh MikeNigh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 597
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 6:13 PM
Knight Hospitaller's Avatar
Knight Hospitaller Knight Hospitaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Greater Philadelphia
Posts: 2,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNigh View Post
Such a great impact for its site.
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 6:20 PM
Larry King Larry King is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Williard Mouse View Post
The 11 story Samschick proposal for 1100-1200 N. Delaware Ave. fits the bill perfectly. It's mix of residential and ground floor retail would add more density and foot traffic to the expressway feel of the street. The "historic designation" of the nondescript warehouse can effectively kill this project.

I have sneaking suspicion that the historic tag was more the work of powerful forces like the SugarHouse and Live Nation's Fillmore than proximic NIMBYs. After all, more residential neighbors equals more noise and traffic complaints.
It's a bummer. Maybe he can build a tower around the warehouse and preserve the facade or somethign
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2015, 3:58 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,457
Update from Building Philly





More photos here:
https://www.facebook.com/BuildingPhilly
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2015, 6:44 PM
dab dab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 35
It's really staggering how much of an impact this building has...particularly from the on/off ramps for 95... I pass it every day I go into the office, it's presence is definitely going to be felt.
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2015, 11:59 PM
shadowbat2 shadowbat2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 901
You know fall is here when the sheeting goes up....
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2015, 10:15 AM
BenKatzPhillytoParis BenKatzPhillytoParis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 313
Quote:
Originally Posted by dab View Post
It's really staggering how much of an impact this building has...particularly from the on/off ramps for 95... I pass it every day I go into the office, it's presence is definitely going to be felt.
And also its contribution to a street wall along Delaware Avenue. Instantly makes the area feel more urban. Imagine developments of this scale running up and down the river.
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2015, 12:29 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenKatzPhillytoParis View Post
And also its contribution to a street wall along Delaware Avenue. Instantly makes the area feel more urban. Imagine developments of this scale running up and down the river.
That would be nice. This is so much better than a weedy lot on Delaware Ave. I also like the exterior of this building. Much better than the initial renderings showing grayish glass and concrete.
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2015, 1:50 PM
Mappy Mappy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 259
Here is one from a different angle

     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:35 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.